V -> v
This commit is contained in:
parent
99d7f5c1b8
commit
2dad2d4c42
|
@ -840,9 +840,9 @@ Verify that `BLSVerify(pubkey=get_beacon_proposer(state, block.slot).pubkey, dat
|
|||
### Verify and process RANDAO reveal
|
||||
|
||||
* Let `repeat_hash(x, n) = x if n == 0 else repeat_hash(hash(x), n-1)`.
|
||||
* Let `V = get_beacon_proposer(state, block.slot).
|
||||
* Verify that `repeat_hash(block.randao_reveal, (block.slot - V.randao_last_change) // RANDAO_SLOTS_PER_LAYER + 1) == V.randao_commitment`
|
||||
* Set `state.randao_mix = xor(state.randao_mix, block.randao_reveal)`, `V.randao_commitment = block.randao_reveal`, `V.randao_last_change = block.slot`
|
||||
* Let `proposer = get_beacon_proposer(state, block.slot).
|
||||
* Verify that `repeat_hash(block.randao_reveal, (block.slot - proposer.randao_last_change) // RANDAO_SLOTS_PER_LAYER + 1) == proposer.randao_commitment`
|
||||
* Set `state.randao_mix = xor(state.randao_mix, block.randao_reveal)`, `proposer.randao_commitment = block.randao_reveal`, `proposer.randao_last_change = block.slot`
|
||||
|
||||
Finally, if `block.candidate_pow_hash_chain_tip = state.candidate_pow_hash_chain_tip`, set `state.candidate_hash_chain_tip_votes += 1`.
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -992,22 +992,22 @@ Note: When applying penalties in the following balance recalculations implemente
|
|||
|
||||
Case 1: `time_since_finality <= 4 * CYCLE_LENGTH`:
|
||||
|
||||
* Any validator `V` in `prev_s_attesters` gains `adjust_for_inclusion_distance(balance_at_stake(V) // reward_quotient * (prev_s_attesters - total_balance) // total_balance, inclusion_distance(V))``.
|
||||
* Any active validator `V` not in `prev_s_attesters` loses `balance_at_stake(V) // reward_quotient`.
|
||||
* Any validator `v` in `prev_s_attesters` gains `adjust_for_inclusion_distance(balance_at_stake(v) // reward_quotient * (prev_s_attesters - total_balance) // total_balance, inclusion_distance(v))``.
|
||||
* Any active validator `v` not in `prev_s_attesters` loses `balance_at_stake(v) // reward_quotient`.
|
||||
|
||||
Case 2: `time_since_finality > 4 * CYCLE_LENGTH`:
|
||||
|
||||
* Any validator in `prev_s_attesters` sees their balance unchanged.
|
||||
* Any active validator `V` not in `prev_s_attesters`, and any validator with `status == PENALIZED`, loses `balance_at_stake(V) // reward_quotient + balance_at_stake(V) * time_since_finality // quadratic_penalty_quotient`.
|
||||
* Any active validator `v` not in `prev_s_attesters`, and any validator with `status == PENALIZED`, loses `balance_at_stake(v) // reward_quotient + balance_at_stake(v) * time_since_finality // quadratic_penalty_quotient`.
|
||||
|
||||
For each `V` in `prev_s_attesters`, the validator `proposer = get_beacon_proposer(state, inclusion_slot(V))` gains `balance_at_stake(proposer) // INCLUDER_REWARD_QUOTIENT`.
|
||||
For each `v` in `prev_s_attesters`, the validator `proposer = get_beacon_proposer(state, inclusion_slot(v))` gains `balance_at_stake(proposer) // INCLUDER_REWARD_QUOTIENT`.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Balance recalculations related to crosslink rewards
|
||||
|
||||
For every `ShardAndCommittee` object `obj` in `shard_and_committee_for_slots[:CYCLE_LENGTH]` (ie. the objects corresponding to the slot before the current one), for each `v in obj.committee`, where `V = state.validators[b]` adjust balances as follows:
|
||||
For every `ShardAndCommittee` object `obj` in `shard_and_committee_for_slots[:CYCLE_LENGTH]` (ie. the objects corresponding to the slot before the current one), for each `v in obj.committee`, where `v = state.validators[b]` adjust balances as follows:
|
||||
|
||||
* If `v in attesting_validators(obj)`, `V.balance += adjust_for_inclusion_distance(balance_at_stake(V) // reward_quotient * total_attesting_balance(obj) // total_balance(obj)), inclusion_distance(V))`.
|
||||
* If `v not in attesting_validators(obj)`, `V.balance -= balance_at_stake(V) // reward_quotient`.
|
||||
* If `v in attesting_validators(obj)`, `v.balance += adjust_for_inclusion_distance(balance_at_stake(v) // reward_quotient * total_attesting_balance(obj) // total_balance(obj)), inclusion_distance(v))`.
|
||||
* If `v not in attesting_validators(obj)`, `v.balance -= balance_at_stake(v) // reward_quotient`.
|
||||
|
||||
#### PoW chain related rules
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue