Fixes as per Danny's comments
This commit is contained in:
parent
cc5cef52cb
commit
2611180119
|
@ -166,7 +166,7 @@ Unless otherwise indicated, code appearing in `this style` is to be interpreted
|
|||
| `BLS_WITHDRAWAL_PREFIX_BYTE` | `0x00` | - |
|
||||
| `MAX_CASPER_VOTES` | `2**10` (= 1,024) | votes |
|
||||
| `LATEST_BLOCK_ROOTS_LENGTH` | `2**13` (= 8,192) | block roots |
|
||||
| `LATEST_RANDAO_MIXES_LENGTH` | `2**13` (= 8,192) | block roots |
|
||||
| `LATEST_RANDAO_MIXES_LENGTH` | `2**13` (= 8,192) | randao mixes |
|
||||
| `EMPTY_SIGNATURE` | `[bytes48(0), bytes48(0)]` | - |
|
||||
|
||||
* For the safety of crosslinks a minimum committee size of 111 is [recommended](https://vitalik.ca/files/Ithaca201807_Sharding.pdf). (Unbiasable randomness with a Verifiable Delay Function (VDF) will improve committee robustness and lower the safe minimum committee size.) The shuffling algorithm generally ensures (assuming sufficient validators) committee sizes at least `TARGET_COMMITTEE_SIZE // 2`.
|
||||
|
@ -916,9 +916,8 @@ def get_block_root(state: BeaconState,
|
|||
"""
|
||||
Returns the block root at a recent ``slot``.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
earliest_slot_in_array = state.slot - len(state.latest_block_roots)
|
||||
assert earliest_slot_in_array <= slot < state.slot
|
||||
return state.latest_block_roots[slot - earliest_slot_in_array]
|
||||
assert slot > state.slot - LATEST_BLOCK_ROOTS_LENGTH
|
||||
return state.latest_block_roots[slot % LATEST_BLOCK_ROOTS_LENGTH]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
`get_block_root(_, s)` should always return `hash_tree_root` of the block in the beacon chain at slot `s`, and `get_shard_committees_at_slot(_, s)` should not change unless the [validator](#dfn-validator) registry changes.
|
||||
|
@ -1388,12 +1387,12 @@ Below are the processing steps that happen at every slot.
|
|||
|
||||
* Set `state.slot += 1`.
|
||||
* Set `state.validator_registry[get_beacon_proposer_index(state, state.slot)].randao_layers += 1`.
|
||||
* Set `state.latest_randao_mixes = state.latest_randao_mixes[(block.slot - 1) % LATEST_RANDAO_MIXES_LENGTH]`
|
||||
* Set `state.latest_randao_mixes[state.slot % LATEST_RANDAO_MIXES_LENGTH] = state.latest_randao_mixes[(state.slot - 1) % LATEST_RANDAO_MIXES_LENGTH]`
|
||||
|
||||
### Block roots
|
||||
|
||||
* Let `previous_block_root` be the `hash_tree_root` of the previous beacon block processed in the chain.
|
||||
* Set `state.latest_block_roots[(block.slot - 1) % LATEST_BLOCK_ROOTS_LENGTH] = previous_block_root`.
|
||||
* Set `state.latest_block_roots[(state.slot - 1) % LATEST_BLOCK_ROOTS_LENGTH] = previous_block_root`.
|
||||
* If `state.slot % LATEST_BLOCK_ROOTS_LENGTH == 0` append `merkle_root(state.latest_block_roots)` to `state.batched_block_roots`.
|
||||
|
||||
## Per-block processing
|
||||
|
@ -1415,7 +1414,7 @@ Below are the processing steps that happen at every `block`.
|
|||
* Let `repeat_hash(x, n) = x if n == 0 else repeat_hash(hash(x), n-1)`.
|
||||
* Let `proposer = state.validator_registry[get_beacon_proposer_index(state, state.slot)]`.
|
||||
* Verify that `repeat_hash(block.randao_reveal, proposer.randao_layers) == proposer.randao_commitment`.
|
||||
* Set `state.latest_randao_mixes[block.slot % LATEST_RANDAO_MIXES_LENGTH] = xor(state.latest_randao_mixes[block.slot % LATEST_RANDAO_MIXES_LENGTH], block.randao_reveal)`
|
||||
* Set `state.latest_randao_mixes[state.slot % LATEST_RANDAO_MIXES_LENGTH] = xor(state.latest_randao_mixes[state.slot % LATEST_RANDAO_MIXES_LENGTH], block.randao_reveal)`
|
||||
* Set `proposer.randao_commitment = block.randao_reveal`.
|
||||
* Set `proposer.randao_layers = 0`.
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue