Merge pull request #381 from ethereum/rename_custody
Rename `poc_` to `custody_`
This commit is contained in:
commit
17b5305c97
|
@ -101,7 +101,7 @@
|
|||
- [Attestations](#attestations-1)
|
||||
- [Deposits](#deposits-1)
|
||||
- [Exits](#exits-1)
|
||||
- [Miscellaneous](#miscellaneous)
|
||||
- [Custody](#custody)
|
||||
- [Per-epoch processing](#per-epoch-processing)
|
||||
- [Helpers](#helpers)
|
||||
- [Receipt roots](#receipt-roots)
|
||||
|
@ -113,7 +113,6 @@
|
|||
- [Crosslinks](#crosslinks-1)
|
||||
- [Ejections](#ejections)
|
||||
- [Validator registry](#validator-registry)
|
||||
- [Proposer reshuffling](#proposer-reshuffling)
|
||||
- [Final updates](#final-updates)
|
||||
- [State root processing](#state-root-processing)
|
||||
- [References](#references)
|
||||
|
@ -288,14 +287,14 @@ Unless otherwise indicated, code appearing in `this style` is to be interpreted
|
|||
|
||||
```python
|
||||
{
|
||||
# Proof-of-custody indices (0 bits)
|
||||
'aggregate_signature_poc_0_indices': '[uint24]',
|
||||
# Proof-of-custody indices (1 bits)
|
||||
'aggregate_signature_poc_1_indices': '[uint24]',
|
||||
# Validator indices with custody bit equal to 0
|
||||
'custody_bit_0_indices': ['uint24'],
|
||||
# Validator indices with custody bit equal to 1
|
||||
'custody_bit_1_indices': ['uint24'],
|
||||
# Attestation data
|
||||
'data': AttestationData,
|
||||
# Aggregate signature
|
||||
'aggregate_signature': '[uint384]',
|
||||
'aggregate_signature': ['uint384'],
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -309,7 +308,7 @@ Unless otherwise indicated, code appearing in `this style` is to be interpreted
|
|||
'data': AttestationData,
|
||||
# Attester participation bitfield
|
||||
'participation_bitfield': 'bytes',
|
||||
# Proof of custody bitfield
|
||||
# Custody bitfield
|
||||
'custody_bitfield': 'bytes',
|
||||
# BLS aggregate signature
|
||||
'aggregate_signature': ['uint384'],
|
||||
|
@ -345,8 +344,8 @@ Unless otherwise indicated, code appearing in `this style` is to be interpreted
|
|||
{
|
||||
# Attestation data
|
||||
data: AttestationData,
|
||||
# Proof of custody bit
|
||||
poc_bit: bool,
|
||||
# Custody bit
|
||||
custody_bit: bool,
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -388,8 +387,8 @@ Unless otherwise indicated, code appearing in `this style` is to be interpreted
|
|||
'withdrawal_credentials': 'hash32',
|
||||
# Initial RANDAO commitment
|
||||
'randao_commitment': 'hash32',
|
||||
# Initial proof of custody commitment
|
||||
'poc_commitment': 'hash32',
|
||||
# Initial custody commitment
|
||||
'custody_commitment': 'hash32',
|
||||
# a BLS signature of this ``DepositInput``
|
||||
'proof_of_possession': ['uint384'],
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -436,15 +435,15 @@ Unless otherwise indicated, code appearing in `this style` is to be interpreted
|
|||
'proposer_slashings': [ProposerSlashing],
|
||||
'casper_slashings': [CasperSlashing],
|
||||
'attestations': [Attestation],
|
||||
'poc_seed_changes': [ProofOfCustodySeedChange],
|
||||
'poc_challenges': [ProofOfCustodyChallenge],
|
||||
'poc_responses': [ProofOfCustodyResponse],
|
||||
'custody_reseeds': [CustodyReseed],
|
||||
'custody_challenges': [CustodyChallenge],
|
||||
'custody_responses': [CustodyResponse],
|
||||
'deposits': [Deposit],
|
||||
'exits': [Exit],
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
`ProofOfCustodySeedChange`, `ProofOfCustodyChallenge`, and `ProofOfCustodyResponse` will be defined in phase 1; for now, put dummy classes as these lists will remain empty throughout phase 0.
|
||||
`CustodyReseed`, `CustodyChallenge`, and `CustodyResponse` will be defined in phase 1; for now, put dummy classes as these lists will remain empty throughout phase 0.
|
||||
|
||||
#### `ProposalSignedData`
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -482,10 +481,8 @@ Unless otherwise indicated, code appearing in `this style` is to be interpreted
|
|||
'latest_vdf_outputs': ['hash32'],
|
||||
'shard_committees_at_slots': [[ShardCommittee]],
|
||||
|
||||
# Proof of custody
|
||||
# Placeholders for now; ProofOfCustodyChallenge is defined in phase 1, implementers can
|
||||
# put a dummy class in for now, as the list will remain empty throughout phase 0
|
||||
'poc_challenges': [ProofOfCustodyChallenge],
|
||||
# Custody challenges
|
||||
'custody_challenges': [CustodyChallenge],
|
||||
|
||||
# Finality
|
||||
'previous_justified_slot': 'uint64',
|
||||
|
@ -524,11 +521,12 @@ Unless otherwise indicated, code appearing in `this style` is to be interpreted
|
|||
'latest_status_change_slot': 'uint64',
|
||||
# Exit counter when validator exited (or 0)
|
||||
'exit_count': 'uint64',
|
||||
# Proof of custody commitment
|
||||
'poc_commitment': 'hash32',
|
||||
# Slot the proof of custody seed was last changed
|
||||
'last_poc_change_slot': 'uint64',
|
||||
'second_last_poc_change_slot': 'uint64',
|
||||
# Custody commitment
|
||||
'custody_commitment': 'hash32',
|
||||
# Slot of latest custody reseed
|
||||
'latest_custody_reseed_slot': 'uint64',
|
||||
# Slot of second-latest custody reseed
|
||||
'penultimate_custody_reseed_slot': 'uint64',
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -551,7 +549,7 @@ Unless otherwise indicated, code appearing in `this style` is to be interpreted
|
|||
'shard': 'uint64',
|
||||
# Validator indices
|
||||
'committee': ['uint24'],
|
||||
# Total validator count (for proofs of custody)
|
||||
# Total validator count (for custody challenges)
|
||||
'total_validator_count': 'uint64',
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
@ -588,9 +586,9 @@ Unless otherwise indicated, code appearing in `this style` is to be interpreted
|
|||
'data': AttestationData,
|
||||
# Attester participation bitfield
|
||||
'participation_bitfield': 'bytes',
|
||||
# Proof of custody bitfield
|
||||
# Custody bitfield
|
||||
'custody_bitfield': 'bytes',
|
||||
# Slot in which it was included
|
||||
# Slot the attestation was included
|
||||
'slot_included': 'uint64',
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
@ -1046,13 +1044,13 @@ def get_domain(fork_data: ForkData,
|
|||
|
||||
```python
|
||||
def verify_slashable_vote_data(state: BeaconState, vote_data: SlashableVoteData) -> bool:
|
||||
if len(vote_data.aggregate_signature_poc_0_indices) + len(vote_data.aggregate_signature_poc_1_indices) > MAX_CASPER_VOTES:
|
||||
if len(vote_data.custody_bit_0_indices) + len(vote_data.custody_bit_1_indices) > MAX_CASPER_VOTES:
|
||||
return False
|
||||
|
||||
return bls_verify_multiple(
|
||||
pubkeys=[
|
||||
aggregate_pubkey([state.validators[i].pubkey for i in vote_data.aggregate_signature_poc_0_indices]),
|
||||
aggregate_pubkey([state.validators[i].pubkey for i in vote_data.aggregate_signature_poc_1_indices]),
|
||||
aggregate_pubkey([state.validators[i].pubkey for i in vote_data.custody_bit_0_indices]),
|
||||
aggregate_pubkey([state.validators[i].pubkey for i in vote_data.custody_bit_1_indices]),
|
||||
],
|
||||
messages=[
|
||||
hash_tree_root(AttestationDataAndCustodyBit(vote_data, False)),
|
||||
|
@ -1148,9 +1146,9 @@ A valid block with slot `INITIAL_SLOT_NUMBER` (a "genesis block") has the follow
|
|||
proposer_slashings=[],
|
||||
casper_slashings=[],
|
||||
attestations=[],
|
||||
poc_seed_changes=[],
|
||||
poc_challenges=[],
|
||||
poc_responses=[],
|
||||
custody_reseeds=[],
|
||||
custody_challenges=[],
|
||||
custody_responses=[],
|
||||
deposits=[],
|
||||
exits=[],
|
||||
),
|
||||
|
@ -1185,8 +1183,8 @@ def get_initial_beacon_state(initial_validator_deposits: List[Deposit],
|
|||
latest_vdf_outputs=[ZERO_HASH for _ in range(LATEST_RANDAO_MIXES_LENGTH // EPOCH_LENGTH)],
|
||||
shard_committees_at_slots=[],
|
||||
|
||||
# Proof of custody
|
||||
poc_challenges=[],
|
||||
# Custody challenges
|
||||
custody_challenges=[],
|
||||
|
||||
# Finality
|
||||
previous_justified_slot=INITIAL_SLOT_NUMBER,
|
||||
|
@ -1215,7 +1213,7 @@ def get_initial_beacon_state(initial_validator_deposits: List[Deposit],
|
|||
proof_of_possession=deposit.deposit_data.deposit_input.proof_of_possession,
|
||||
withdrawal_credentials=deposit.deposit_data.deposit_input.withdrawal_credentials,
|
||||
randao_commitment=deposit.deposit_data.deposit_input.randao_commitment,
|
||||
poc_commitment=deposit.deposit_data.deposit_input.poc_commitment,
|
||||
custody_commitment=deposit.deposit_data.deposit_input.custody_commitment,
|
||||
)
|
||||
if get_effective_balance(state, validator_index) == MAX_DEPOSIT * GWEI_PER_ETH:
|
||||
update_validator_status(state, validator_index, ACTIVE)
|
||||
|
@ -1247,12 +1245,12 @@ def validate_proof_of_possession(state: BeaconState,
|
|||
proof_of_possession: bytes,
|
||||
withdrawal_credentials: Hash32,
|
||||
randao_commitment: Hash32,
|
||||
poc_commitment: Hash32) -> bool:
|
||||
custody_commitment: Hash32) -> bool:
|
||||
proof_of_possession_data = DepositInput(
|
||||
pubkey=pubkey,
|
||||
withdrawal_credentials=withdrawal_credentials,
|
||||
randao_commitment=randao_commitment,
|
||||
poc_commitment=poc_commitment,
|
||||
custody_commitment=custody_commitment,
|
||||
proof_of_possession=EMPTY_SIGNATURE,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -1277,7 +1275,7 @@ def process_deposit(state: BeaconState,
|
|||
proof_of_possession: bytes,
|
||||
withdrawal_credentials: Hash32,
|
||||
randao_commitment: Hash32,
|
||||
poc_commitment: Hash32) -> int:
|
||||
custody_commitment: Hash32) -> int:
|
||||
"""
|
||||
Process a deposit from Ethereum 1.0.
|
||||
Note that this function mutates ``state``.
|
||||
|
@ -1289,7 +1287,7 @@ def process_deposit(state: BeaconState,
|
|||
proof_of_possession,
|
||||
withdrawal_credentials,
|
||||
randao_commitment,
|
||||
poc_commitment,
|
||||
custody_commitment,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
validator_pubkeys = [v.pubkey for v in state.validator_registry]
|
||||
|
@ -1304,9 +1302,9 @@ def process_deposit(state: BeaconState,
|
|||
status=PENDING_ACTIVATION,
|
||||
latest_status_change_slot=state.slot,
|
||||
exit_count=0,
|
||||
poc_commitment=poc_commitment,
|
||||
last_poc_change_slot=0,
|
||||
second_last_poc_change_slot=0,
|
||||
custody_commitment=custody_commitment,
|
||||
latest_custody_reseed_slot=INITIAL_SLOT_NUMBER,
|
||||
penultimate_custody_reseed_slot=INITIAL_SLOT_NUMBER,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
index = min_empty_validator_index(state.validator_registry, state.validator_balances, state.slot)
|
||||
|
@ -1492,7 +1490,7 @@ For each `casper_slashing` in `block.body.casper_slashings`:
|
|||
|
||||
* Let `slashable_vote_data_1 = casper_slashing.slashable_vote_data_1`.
|
||||
* Let `slashable_vote_data_2 = casper_slashing.slashable_vote_data_2`.
|
||||
* Let `indices(slashable_vote_data) = slashable_vote_data.aggregate_signature_poc_0_indices + slashable_vote_data.aggregate_signature_poc_1_indices`.
|
||||
* Let `indices(slashable_vote_data) = slashable_vote_data.custody_bit_0_indices + slashable_vote_data.custody_bit_1_indices`.
|
||||
* Let `intersection = [x for x in indices(slashable_vote_data_1) if x in indices(slashable_vote_data_2)]`.
|
||||
* Verify that `len(intersection) >= 1`.
|
||||
* Verify that `slashable_vote_data_1.data != slashable_vote_data_2.data`.
|
||||
|
@ -1552,7 +1550,7 @@ process_deposit(
|
|||
proof_of_possession=deposit.deposit_data.deposit_input.proof_of_possession,
|
||||
withdrawal_credentials=deposit.deposit_data.deposit_input.withdrawal_credentials,
|
||||
randao_commitment=deposit.deposit_data.deposit_input.randao_commitment,
|
||||
poc_commitment=deposit.deposit_data.deposit_input.poc_commitment,
|
||||
custody_commitment=deposit.deposit_data.deposit_input.custody_commitment,
|
||||
)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -1568,9 +1566,9 @@ For each `exit` in `block.body.exits`:
|
|||
* Verify that `bls_verify(pubkey=validator.pubkey, message=ZERO_HASH, signature=exit.signature, domain=get_domain(state.fork_data, exit.slot, DOMAIN_EXIT))`.
|
||||
* Run `update_validator_status(state, validator_index, new_status=ACTIVE_PENDING_EXIT)`.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Miscellaneous
|
||||
#### Custody
|
||||
|
||||
[TO BE REMOVED IN PHASE 1] Verify that `len(block.body.poc_seed_changes) == len(block.body.poc_challenges) == len(block.body.poc_responses) == 0`.
|
||||
[TO BE REMOVED IN PHASE 1] Verify that `len(block.body.custody_reseeds) == len(block.body.custody_challenges) == len(block.body.custody_responses) == 0`.
|
||||
|
||||
## Per-epoch processing
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue