Turned slashed and initiated_exit into booleans
Cuts validator record size from 120 to 106 bytes, and arguably is a simplification
This commit is contained in:
parent
7f528a5082
commit
09e8448763
|
@ -256,11 +256,6 @@ Code snippets appearing in `this style` are to be interpreted as Python code.
|
|||
* The `BASE_REWARD_QUOTIENT` parameter dictates the per-epoch reward. It corresponds to ~2.54% annual interest assuming 10 million participating ETH in every epoch.
|
||||
* The `INACTIVITY_PENALTY_QUOTIENT` equals `INVERSE_SQRT_E_DROP_TIME**2` where `INVERSE_SQRT_E_DROP_TIME := 2**12 epochs` (~18 days) is the time it takes the inactivity penalty to reduce the balance of non-participating [validators](#dfn-validator) to about `1/sqrt(e) ~= 60.6%`. Indeed, the balance retained by offline [validators](#dfn-validator) after `n` epochs is about `(1-1/INACTIVITY_PENALTY_QUOTIENT)**(n**2/2)` so after `INVERSE_SQRT_E_DROP_TIME` epochs it is roughly `(1-1/INACTIVITY_PENALTY_QUOTIENT)**(INACTIVITY_PENALTY_QUOTIENT/2) ~= 1/sqrt(e)`.
|
||||
|
||||
### Status flags
|
||||
|
||||
| Name | Value |
|
||||
| - | - |
|
||||
| `INITIATED_EXIT` | `2**0` (= 1) |
|
||||
|
||||
### Max transactions per block
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -571,10 +566,10 @@ The following data structures are defined as [SimpleSerialize (SSZ)](https://git
|
|||
'exit_epoch': 'uint64',
|
||||
# Epoch when validator is eligible to withdraw
|
||||
'withdrawable_epoch': 'uint64',
|
||||
# Epoch when validator was slashed
|
||||
'slashed_epoch': 'uint64',
|
||||
# Status flags
|
||||
'status_flags': 'uint64',
|
||||
# Did the validator initiate an exit
|
||||
'initiated_exit': 'bool',
|
||||
# Was the validator penalized
|
||||
'slashed': 'bool',
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -1273,8 +1268,8 @@ def process_deposit(state: BeaconState, deposit: Deposit) -> None:
|
|||
activation_epoch=FAR_FUTURE_EPOCH,
|
||||
exit_epoch=FAR_FUTURE_EPOCH,
|
||||
withdrawable_epoch=FAR_FUTURE_EPOCH,
|
||||
slashed_epoch=FAR_FUTURE_EPOCH,
|
||||
status_flags=0,
|
||||
initiated_exit=False,
|
||||
slashed=False,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
# Note: In phase 2 registry indices that have been withdrawn for a long time will be recycled.
|
||||
|
@ -1314,7 +1309,7 @@ def initiate_validator_exit(state: BeaconState, index: ValidatorIndex) -> None:
|
|||
Note that this function mutates ``state``.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
validator = state.validator_registry[index]
|
||||
validator.status_flags |= INITIATED_EXIT
|
||||
validator.initiated_exit = True
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
#### `exit_validator`
|
||||
|
@ -1351,7 +1346,7 @@ def slash_validator(state: BeaconState, index: ValidatorIndex) -> None:
|
|||
whistleblower_reward = get_effective_balance(state, index) // WHISTLEBLOWER_REWARD_QUOTIENT
|
||||
state.validator_balances[whistleblower_index] += whistleblower_reward
|
||||
state.validator_balances[index] -= whistleblower_reward
|
||||
validator.slashed_epoch = get_current_epoch(state)
|
||||
validator.slashed = True
|
||||
validator.withdrawable_epoch = get_current_epoch(state) + LATEST_SLASHED_EXIT_LENGTH
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -1644,7 +1639,7 @@ For each `proposer_slashing` in `block.body.proposer_slashings`:
|
|||
* Verify that `proposer_slashing.proposal_1.slot == proposer_slashing.proposal_2.slot`.
|
||||
* Verify that `proposer_slashing.proposal_1.shard == proposer_slashing.proposal_2.shard`.
|
||||
* Verify that `proposer_slashing.proposal_1.block_root != proposer_slashing.proposal_2.block_root`.
|
||||
* Verify that `proposer.slashed_epoch > get_current_epoch(state)`.
|
||||
* Verify that `proposer.slashed == False`.
|
||||
* Verify that `bls_verify(pubkey=proposer.pubkey, message_hash=signed_root(proposer_slashing.proposal_1, "signature"), signature=proposer_slashing.proposal_1.signature, domain=get_domain(state.fork, slot_to_epoch(proposer_slashing.proposal_1.slot), DOMAIN_PROPOSAL))`.
|
||||
* Verify that `bls_verify(pubkey=proposer.pubkey, message_hash=signed_root(proposer_slashing.proposal_2, "signature"), signature=proposer_slashing.proposal_2.signature, domain=get_domain(state.fork, slot_to_epoch(proposer_slashing.proposal_2.slot), DOMAIN_PROPOSAL))`.
|
||||
* Run `slash_validator(state, proposer_slashing.proposer_index)`.
|
||||
|
@ -1661,7 +1656,7 @@ For each `attester_slashing` in `block.body.attester_slashings`:
|
|||
* Verify that `is_double_vote(slashable_attestation_1.data, slashable_attestation_2.data)` or `is_surround_vote(slashable_attestation_1.data, slashable_attestation_2.data)`.
|
||||
* Verify that `verify_slashable_attestation(state, slashable_attestation_1)`.
|
||||
* Verify that `verify_slashable_attestation(state, slashable_attestation_2)`.
|
||||
* Let `slashable_indices = [index for index in slashable_attestation_1.validator_indices if index in slashable_attestation_2.validator_indices and state.validator_registry[index].slashed_epoch > get_current_epoch(state)]`.
|
||||
* Let `slashable_indices = [index for index in slashable_attestation_1.validator_indices if index in slashable_attestation_2.validator_indices and state.validator_registry[index].slashed == False]`.
|
||||
* Verify that `len(slashable_indices) >= 1`.
|
||||
* Run `slash_validator(state, index)` for each `index` in `slashable_indices`.
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -1895,7 +1890,7 @@ Case 2: `epochs_since_finality > 4`:
|
|||
* Any [active validator](#dfn-active-validator) `index` not in `previous_epoch_attester_indices`, loses `inactivity_penalty(state, index, epochs_since_finality)`.
|
||||
* Any [active validator](#dfn-active-validator) `index` not in `previous_epoch_boundary_attester_indices`, loses `inactivity_penalty(state, index, epochs_since_finality)`.
|
||||
* Any [active validator](#dfn-active-validator) `index` not in `previous_epoch_head_attester_indices`, loses `base_reward(state, index)`.
|
||||
* Any [active validator](#dfn-active-validator) `index` with `validator.slashed_epoch <= current_epoch`, loses `2 * inactivity_penalty(state, index, epochs_since_finality) + base_reward(state, index)`.
|
||||
* Any [active validator](#dfn-active-validator) `index` with `validator.slashed == True`, loses `2 * inactivity_penalty(state, index, epochs_since_finality) + base_reward(state, index)`.
|
||||
* Any [validator](#dfn-validator) `index` in `previous_epoch_attester_indices` loses `base_reward(state, index) - base_reward(state, index) * MIN_ATTESTATION_INCLUSION_DELAY // inclusion_distance(state, index)`
|
||||
|
||||
##### Attestation inclusion
|
||||
|
@ -1974,7 +1969,7 @@ def update_validator_registry(state: BeaconState) -> None:
|
|||
# Exit validators within the allowable balance churn
|
||||
balance_churn = 0
|
||||
for index, validator in enumerate(state.validator_registry):
|
||||
if validator.exit_epoch > get_entry_exit_effect_epoch(current_epoch) and validator.status_flags & INITIATED_EXIT:
|
||||
if validator.exit_epoch > get_entry_exit_effect_epoch(current_epoch) and validator.initiated_exit:
|
||||
# Check the balance churn would be within the allowance
|
||||
balance_churn += get_effective_balance(state, index)
|
||||
if balance_churn > max_balance_churn:
|
||||
|
@ -2015,7 +2010,7 @@ def process_slashings(state: BeaconState) -> None:
|
|||
total_balance = sum(get_effective_balance(state, i) for i in active_validator_indices)
|
||||
|
||||
for index, validator in enumerate(state.validator_registry):
|
||||
if current_epoch == validator.slashed_epoch + LATEST_SLASHED_EXIT_LENGTH // 2:
|
||||
if validator.slashed and current_epoch == validator.withdrawable_epoch - LATEST_SLASHED_EXIT_LENGTH // 2:
|
||||
epoch_index = current_epoch % LATEST_SLASHED_EXIT_LENGTH
|
||||
total_at_start = state.latest_slashed_balances[(epoch_index + 1) % LATEST_SLASHED_EXIT_LENGTH]
|
||||
total_at_end = state.latest_slashed_balances[epoch_index]
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue