Remove comment about self-describing multiformats
There is a description of the key that is used for signatures in SignedObject, and its questionable whether you should want the encryption scheme to be publicly available for EncryptedObject
This commit is contained in:
parent
15725b0c7b
commit
313e98a804
|
@ -32,9 +32,6 @@ Dagger. It is not meant to be a criticism of IPFS.
|
|||
barter with (§3.4)
|
||||
- Object pinning (§3.5.3) inevitably leads to centralized gateways to IPFS, such
|
||||
as Infura and Pinata
|
||||
- There are no self-describing multiformats for encryption and signing (§3.5.5),
|
||||
although [multicodec](https://github.com/multiformats/multicodec/) can
|
||||
probably be used here.
|
||||
- IPFS uses variable size blocks instead of fixed-size chunks (§3.6), which
|
||||
might make it a bit harder to add incentives and pricing
|
||||
- Supporting version control directly in IPFS feels like an unnecessary
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue