From 313e98a804ebea50f10e53b56814882ed03f10a9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Mark Spanbroek Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2021 22:54:33 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Remove comment about self-describing multiformats There is a description of the key that is used for signatures in SignedObject, and its questionable whether you should want the encryption scheme to be publicly available for EncryptedObject --- evaluations/ipfs.md | 3 --- 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/evaluations/ipfs.md b/evaluations/ipfs.md index d74a060..60fb158 100644 --- a/evaluations/ipfs.md +++ b/evaluations/ipfs.md @@ -32,9 +32,6 @@ Dagger. It is not meant to be a criticism of IPFS. barter with (§3.4) - Object pinning (§3.5.3) inevitably leads to centralized gateways to IPFS, such as Infura and Pinata -- There are no self-describing multiformats for encryption and signing (§3.5.5), - although [multicodec](https://github.com/multiformats/multicodec/) can - probably be used here. - IPFS uses variable size blocks instead of fixed-size chunks (§3.6), which might make it a bit harder to add incentives and pricing - Supporting version control directly in IPFS feels like an unnecessary