mirror of
https://github.com/status-im/EIPs.git
synced 2025-02-22 11:48:19 +00:00
I have gone through and updated all existing EIPs to match this rule, including EIP-1. In some cases, people were using markdown citations, I suspect because the long-form was a bit verbose to inline. Since the relative path is quite short, I moved these to inline but I wouldn't be opposed to putting them back to citation format if that is desired by the authors. In doing the migration/cleanup, I found some EIP references to EIPs that don't actually exist. In these cases I tried to excise the reference from the EIP as best I could. It is worth noting that the Readme actually already had this rule, it just wasn't expressed properly in EIP-1 and the "Citation Format" section of the readme I think caused people a bit of confusion (when citing externally, you should use the citation format).
597 B
597 B
eip | title | author | status | type | created | requires |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1588 | Hardfork Meta: Ethereum ProgPoW | Ikmyeong Na (@naikmyeong) | Draft | Meta | 2018-11-16 | 1057 |
Abstract
This meta-EIP specifies the changes included in the alternative Ethereum hardfork named Ethereum ProgPoW.
Specification
- Codename: Ethereum ProgPoW
- Aliases: N/A
- Activation:
Block >= 7280000
on the Ethereum mainnet
- Included EIPs:
- EIP-1057: ProgPoW, a Programmatic Proof-of-Work
Copyright
Copyright and related rights waived via CC0.