This ERC provides standard interfaces and processes for flash lenders and borrowers, allowing for flash loan integration without a need to consider each particular implementation.
21 KiB
eip | title | author | discussions-to | status | type | category | created |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3156 | Flash Loans | Alberto Cuesta Cañada (@albertocuestacanada), Fiona Kobayashi (@fifikobayashi), fubuloubu (@fubuloubu), Austin Williams (@onewayfunction) | https://ethereum-magicians.org/t/erc-3156-flash-loans-review-discussion/5077 | Review | Standards Track | ERC | 2020-11-15 |
Simple Summary
This ERC provides standard interfaces and processes for flash lenders and borrowers, allowing for flash loan integration without a need to consider each particular implementation.
Motivation
Flash loans allow smart contracts to lend an amount of tokens without a requirement for collateral, with the condition that they must be returned within the same transaction.
Early adopters of the flash loan pattern, such as Aave, DxDy, Uniswap and the Yield Protocol have produced different interfaces and different use patterns. The diversification is expected to intensify, and with it the technical debt required to integrate with diverse flash lending patterns.
Some of the high level diferences in the approaches across the protocols include:
- Repayment approaches at the end of the transaction, where Aave V2 pulls the flash loaned amount plus the flash fee off the flash smart contract, compared to other protocols where the contract needs to explicitly calculate the debt+fee amount and manually return it to the lending pool.
- Uniswap's Flash Swaps offer the ability to repay the flash transaction using a token that is different to what was originally flash borrowed, which can reduce the overall complexity of the flash transaction and gas fees, depending on the purpose of the flash swap (i.e. the second last step in flash self liquidation to swap back into the repayment token).
- DyDx offering a single entry point into the protocol regardless of whether you're buying, selling, depositing or chaining them together as a flash loan, whereas other protocols offer discrete entry points (e.g. Uniswap V2's swap() and Aave V2's flashLoan() methods).
- The Yield Protocol allows to flash mint any amount of its native token without charging a fee, effectively allowing flash loans bounded by computational constraints instead of asset ownership constraints.
Specification
A flash lending feature integrates two smart contracts using a callback pattern. These are called the LENDER and the RECEIVER in this EIP.
Lender Specification
A lender
MUST implement the IERC3156FlashLender interface.
interface IERC3156FlashLender {
function maxFlashAmount(
IERC20 token
) external view returns (uint256);
function flashFee(
IERC20 token,
uint256 amount
) external view returns (uint256);
function flashLoan(
IERC3156FlashBorrower receiver,
IERC20 token,
uint256 amount,
bytes calldata data
) external;
}
The maxFlashAmount
function MUST return the maximum loan possible for token
. If a token
is not currently supported maxFlashAmount
MUST return 0, instead of reverting.
The flashFee
function MUST return the fee charged for a loan of amount
token
. If the loan cannot be executed flashFee
MUST revert.
The flashLoan
function MUST include a callback to the onFlashLoan
function in a IERC3156FlashBorrower
contract.
function flashLoan(
IERC3156FlashBorrower receiver,
IERC20 token,
uint256 amount,
bytes calldata data
) external {
...
receiver.onFlashLoan(msg.sender, token, amount, fee, data);
...
}
The flashLoan
function MUST transfer amount
of token
to receiver
before the callback to the borrower.
The flashLoan
function MUST include msg.sender
as the sender
to onFlashLoan
.
The flashLoan
function MUST NOT modify the token
, amount
and data
parameter received, and MUST pass them on to onFlashLoan
.
After the callback, the flashLoan
function MUST take the amount + fee
token
from the receiver
, or revert if this is not successful.
The batch flash loans extension is OPTIONAL for ERC-3156 smart contracts. This allows flash loans to be composed of several ERC20 tokens.
A lender
offering batch flash loans MUST implement the IERC3156BatchFlashLender interface.
interface IERC3156BatchFlashLender is IERC3156FlashLender {
function batchFlashLoan(
IERC3156BatchFlashBorrower receiver,
IERC20[] tokens,
uint256[] amounts,
bytes calldata data
) external;
}
The batchFlashLoan
function MUST revert if the length of the amounts
and tokens
arrays differ.
The batchFlashLoan
function MUST include a callback to the onBatchFlashLoan
function in a IERC3156BatchFlashBorrower
contract.
function batchFlashLoan(
IERC3156BatchFlashBorrower receiver,
IERC20[] calldata token,
uint256[] calldata amount,
bytes calldata data
) external {
...
receiver.onBatchFlashLoan(msg.sender, tokens, amounts, fees, data);
...
}
For each token
in tokens
, the batchFlashLoan
function MUST transfer amounts[i]
of tokens[i]
to receiver
before the callback to the borrower.
The batchFlashLoan
function MUST include msg.sender
as the sender
to onBatchFlashLoan
.
The batchFlashLoan
function MUST include a fees
argument to onBatchFlashLoan
with the fee to pay for each individual token
and amount
lent.
The batchFlashLoan
function MUST NOT modify the tokens
, amounts
and data
parameters received, and MUST pass them on to onBatchFlashLoan
.
After the callback, for each token
in tokens
, the batchFlashLoan
function MUST take the amounts[i] + fees[i]
of tokens[i]
from the receiver
, or revert if this is not successful.
Receiver Specification
A receiver
of flash loans MUST implement the IERC3156FlashBorrower interface with an onFlashLoan
callback:
interface IERC3156FlashBorrower {
function onFlashLoan(
IERC3156FlashLender sender,
IERC20 token,
uint256 amount,
uint256 fee,
bytes calldata data
) external;
}
For the transaction to not revert, receiver
MUST approve amount + fee
of token
to be taken by msg.sender
before the end of onFlashLoan
.
The batch flash loans extension is OPTIONAL for ERC-3156 smart contracts. This allows flash loans to be composed of several ERC20 tokens.
interface IERC3156BatchFlashBorrower {
function onBatchFlashLoan(
IERC3156BatchFlashLender sender,
IERC20[] calldata tokens,
uint256[] calldata amounts,
uint256[] calldata fees,
bytes calldata data
) external;
}
For the transaction to not revert, for each token
in tokens
, receiver
MUST approve amounts[i] + fees[i]
of tokens[i]
to be taken by msg.sender
before the end of onFlashLoan
.
Rationale
The interfaces described in this ERC have been chosen as to cover the known flash lending use cases, while allowing for safe and gas efficient implementations.
flashFee(address token, uint256 amount)
flashFee
reverts on unsupported tokens, because returning a numerical value would be incorrect.
flashLoan(address receiver, address token, uint256 amount, bytes calldata data)
flashLoan
has been chosen as descriptive enough, unlikely to clash with other functions in the lender, and including both the use cases in which the tokens lended are held or minted by the lender.
receiver
is taken as a parameter to allow flexibility on the implementation of separate loan initiators and receivers.
Existing flash lenders (Aave, dYdX and Uniswap) all provide flash loans of several token types from the same contract (LendingPool, SoloMargin and UniswapV2Pair). Providing a token
parameter in both the flashLoan
and onFlashLoan
functions matches closely the observed functionality.
A bytes calldata data
parameter is included for the caller to pass arbitrary information to the receiver
, without impacting the utility of the flashLoan
standard.
onFlashLoan(msg.sender, amount, fee, data)
onFlashLoan
has been chosen as descriptive enough, unlikely to clash with other functions in the receiver
, and following the onAction
naming pattern used as well in EIP-667.
A sender
will often be required in the onFlashLoan
function, which the lender knows as msg.sender
. An alternative implementation which would embed the sender
in the data
parameter by the caller would require an additional mechanism for the receiver to verify its accuracy, and is not advisable.
The amount
will be required in the onFlashLoan
function, which the lender took as a parameter. An alternative implementation which would embed the amount
in the data
parameter by the caller would require an additional mechanism for the receiver to verify its accuracy, and is not advisable.
A fee
will often be calculated in the flashLoan
function, which the receiver
must be aware of for repayment. Passing the fee
as a parameter instead of appended to data
is simple and effective.
The amount + fee
are pulled from the receiver
to allow the lender
to implement other functionality that depend on token
balances, without having to lock it for the duration of a flash loan.
Backwards Compatibility
No backwards compatibility issues identified.
Implementation
Flash Borrower Reference Implementation
pragma solidity ^0.8.0;
import "../interfaces/IERC20.sol";
contract FlashBorrower {
function flashBorrow(IERC3156FlashLender lender, IERC20 token, uint256 amount) public {
uint256 _allowance = token.allowance(address(this), lender);
uint256 _fee = lender.flashFee(token, amount);
uint256 _repayment = amount + _fee;
token.approve(lender, _allowance + _repayment);
lender.flashLoan(this, token, amount, data);
}
}
Flash Mint Reference Implementation
pragma solidity ^0.8.0;
import "./ERC20.sol";
import "../interfaces/IERC3156FlashBorrower.sol";
import "../interfaces/IERC3156FlashLender.sol";
/**
* @author Alberto Cuesta Cañada
* @dev Extension of {ERC20} that allows flash minting.
*/
contract FlashMinter is ERC20, IERC3156FlashLender {
uint256 public fee; // Percentage charged on the amount, in bps
/**
* @param fee_ The divisor that will be applied to the `amount` of a `loan`, with the result charged as a `fee`.
*/
constructor (
string memory name,
string memory symbol,
uint256 fee_
) ERC20(name, symbol) {
fee = fee_;
}
/**
* @dev The amount of currency available to be lended.
* @param token The loan currency.
* @return The amount of `token` that can be borrowed.
*/
function maxFlashAmount(
IERC20
) external view override returns (uint256) {
return type(uint256).max;
}
/**
* @dev The fee to be charged for a given loan.
* @param token The loan currency. Must match the address of this contract.
* @param amount The amount of tokens lent.
* @return The amount of `token` to be charged for the loan, on top of the returned principal.
*/
function flashFee(
IERC20 token,
uint256 amount
) external view override returns (uint256) {
require(
token == this,
"FlashMinter: unsupported loan currency"
);
return _flashFee(token, amount);
}
/**
* @dev Loan `amount` tokens to `receiver`, and takes it back plus a `flashFee` after the ERC3156 callback.
* @param receiver The contract receiving the tokens, needs to implement the `onFlashLoan(address user, uint256 amount, uint256 fee, bytes calldata data)` interface.
* @param token The loan currency. Must match the address of this contract.
* @param amount The amount of tokens lent.
* @param data A data parameter to be passed on to the `receiver` for any custom use.
*/
function flashLoan(
IERC3156FlashBorrower receiver,
IERC20 token,
uint256 amount,
bytes calldata data
) external override {
require(token == this, "FlashMinter: unsupported loan currency");
uint256 fee = _flashFee(token, amount);
_mint(address(receiver), amount);
receiver.onFlashLoan(msg.sender, token, amount, fee, data);
uint256 _allowance = allowance(address(receiver), address(this));
require(_allowance >= (amount + fee), "FlashMinter: Flash loan repayment not approved");
_approve(address(receiver), address(this), _allowance - (amount + fee));
_burn(address(receiver), amount + fee);
}
/**
* @dev The fee to be charged for a given loan. Internal function with no checks.
* @param token The loan currency.
* @param amount The amount of tokens lent.
* @return The amount of `token` to be charged for the loan, on top of the returned principal.
*/
function _flashFee(
IERC20,
uint256 amount
) internal view returns (uint256) {
return fee == amount * fee / 10000;
}
Flash Loan Reference Implementation
pragma solidity ^0.8.0;
import "../interfaces/IERC20.sol";
import "../interfaces/IERC3156FlashBorrower.sol";
import "../interfaces/IERC3156FlashLender.sol";
/**
* @author Alberto Cuesta Cañada
* @dev Contract that allows flash lending of any ERC20 tokens it owns.
*/
contract FlashLender is IERC3156FlashLender {
mapping(IERC20 => bool) public supportedTokens;
uint256 public fee; // Percentage charged on the amount, in bps
/**
* @param supportedTokens_ Token contracts supported for flash lending.
* @param fee_ The divisor that will be applied to the `amount` of a `loan`, with the result charged as a `fee`.
*/
constructor(
IERC20[] memory supportedTokens_,
uint256 fee_)
{
for (uint256 i = 0; i < supportedTokens_.length; i++) {
supportedTokens[supportedTokens_[i]] = true;
}
fee = fee_;
}
/**
* @dev Loan `amount` tokens to `receiver`, and takes it back plus a `flashFee` after the callback.
* @param receiver The contract receiving the tokens, needs to implement the IERC3156FlashBorrower interface.
* @param token The loan currency.
* @param amount The amount of tokens lent.
* @param data A data parameter to be passed on to the `receiver` for any custom use.
*/
function flashLoan(
IERC3156FlashBorrower receiver,
IERC20 token,
uint256 amount,
bytes calldata data
) external override {
require(
supportedTokens[token],
"FlashLender: Unsupported currency"
);
uint256 fee = _flashFee(token, amount);
require(
token.transfer(address(receiver), amount),
"FlashLender: Transfer failed"
);
receiver.onFlashLoan(msg.sender, token, amount, fee, data);
require(
token.transferFrom(address(receiver), address(this), amount + fee),
"FlashLender: Repay failed"
);
}
/**
* @dev The fee to be charged for a given loan.
* @param token The loan currency.
* @param amount The amount of tokens lent.
* @return The amount of `token` to be charged for the loan, on top of the returned principal.
*/
function flashFee(
IERC20 token,
uint256 amount
) external view override returns (uint256) {
require(supportedTokens[token], "FlashLender: Unsupported currency");
return _flashFee(token, amount);
}
/**
* @dev The fee to be charged for a given loan. Internal function with no checks.
* @param token The loan currency.
* @param amount The amount of tokens lent.
* @return The amount of `token` to be charged for the loan, on top of the returned principal.
*/
function _flashFee(
IERC20 token,
uint256 amount
) internal view returns (uint256) {
return amount * fee / 10000;
}
/**
* @dev The amount of currency available to be lended.
* @param token The loan currency.
* @return The amount of `token` that can be borrowed.
*/
function maxFlashAmount(
IERC20 token
) external view override returns (uint256) {
return supportedTokens[address(token)] ? token.balanceOf(address(this)) : 0;
}
}
Security Considerations
Verification of callback arguments
The arguments of onFlashLoan
are expected to reflect the conditions of the flash loan, but cannot be trusted unconditionally. They can be divided in two groups, that require different checks before they can be trusted to be genuine.
- No arguments can be assumed to be genuine without some kind of verification.
sender
,token
andvalue
refer to a past transaction that might not have happened if the caller ofonFlashLoan
decides to lie.fee
might be false or calculated incorrectly.data
might have been manipulated by the caller. - To trust that the value of
sender
,token
,value
andfee
are genuine a reasonable pattern is to verify that theonFlashLoan
caller is in a whitelist of verified flash lenders. Since often the caller offlashLoan
will also be receiving theonFlashLoan
callback this will be trivial. In all other cases flash lenders will need to be approved if the arguments inonFlashLoan
are to be trusted. - To trust that the value of
data
is genuine, in addition to the check in point 1, it is recommended to implement theflashLoan
caller to be also theonFlashLoan
receiver. With this pattern, checking inonFlashLoan
thatsender
is the current contract is enough to trust that the contents ofdata
are genuine.
Flash lending security considerations
Automatic approvals for untrusted borrowers
Including in onFlashLoan
the approval for the lender
to take the amount + fee
needs to be combined with a mechanism to verify that the borrower is trusted, such as those described above. An even safer approach is to implement the approval before the flashLoan
is executed.
Flash minting external security considerations
The typical quantum of tokens involved in flash mint transactions will give rise to new innovative attack vectors.
Example 1 - interest rate attack
If there exists a lending protocol that offers stable interests rates, but it does not have floor/ceiling rate limits and it does not rebalance the fixed rate based on flash-induced liquidity changes, then it could be susceptible to the following scenario:
FreeLoanAttack.sol
- Flash mint 1 quintillion DAI
- Deposit the 1 quintillion DAI + $1.5 million worth of ETH collateral
- The quantum of your total deposit now pushes the stable interest rate down to 0.00001% stable interest rate
- Borrow 1 million DAI on 0.00001% stable interest rate based on the 1.5M ETH collateral
- Withdraw and burn the 1 quint DAI to close the original flash mint
- You now have a 1 million DAI loan that is practically interest free for perpetuity ($0.10 / year in interest)
The key takeaway being the obvious need to implement a flat floor/ceiling rate limit and to rebalance the rate based on short term liquidity changes.
Example 2 - arithmetic overflow and underflow
If the flash mint provider does not place any limits on the amount of flash mintable tokens in a transaction, then anyone can flash mint 2^256-1 amount of tokens.
The protocols on the receiving end of the flash mints will need to ensure their contracts can handle this. One obvious way is to leverage OpenZeppelin's SafeMath libraries as a catch-all safety net, however consideration should be given to when it is or isn't used given the gas tradeoffs.
If you recall there was a series of incidents in 2018 where exchanges such as OKEx, Poloniex, HitBTC and Huobi had to shutdown deposits and withdrawls of ERC20 tokens due to integer overflows within the ERC20 token contracts.
Flash minting internal security considerations
The coupling of flash minting with business specific features in the same platform can easily lead to unintended consequences.
Example - Treasury draining
In early implementations of the Yield Protocol flash loaned fyDai could be redeemed for Dai, which could be used to liquidate the Yield Protocol CDP vault in MakerDAO:
- Flash mint a very large amount of fyDai.
- Redeem for Dai as much fyDai as the Yield Protocol collateral would allow.
- Trigger a stability rate increase with a call to
jug.drip
which would make the Yield Protocol uncollateralized. - Liquidate the Yield Protocol CDP vault in MakerDAO.
Copyright
Copyright and related rights waived via CC0.