EIPs/EIPS/eip-2315.md
Greg Colvin 2490b642f0
Automatically merged updates to draft EIP(s) 2315 (#2504)
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:

 - It only modifies existing Draft or Last Call EIP(s)
 - The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
 - The build is passing
2020-02-03 18:26:07 +13:00

109 lines
3.4 KiB
Markdown

---
eip: 2315
title: Simple Subroutines for the EVM
status: Draft
type: Standards Track
category: Core
author: Greg Colvin (greg@colvin.org)
discussions-to: https://ethereum-magicians.org/t/eip-2315-simple-subroutines-for-the-evm/3941
created: 2019-10-17
---
## Abstract
This proposal introduces two opcodes to support subroutines: `JUMPSUB` and `RETURNSUB`.
## Motivation
The EVM does not provide subroutines as a primitive. Instead, calls must be synthesized by fetching and pushing the current program counter on the data stack and jumping to the subroutine address; returns must be synthesized by getting the return address to the top of stack and jumping back to it.
## Specification
##### `JUMPSUB`
Jumps to the address on top of the stack, which must be the offset of a `JUMPDEST`.
##### `RETURNSUB`
Returns to the most recently executed `JUMPSUB` and advances to the following instruction.
A program may `JUMPSUB` at most 1023 times without an intervening `RETURNSUB`. A program which executes `RETURNSUB` without no prior `BEGINSUB` will `STOP`.
## Rationale
This is the smallest possible change that provides native subroutines without breaking backwards compatibility.
## Backwards Compatibility
These changes do not affect the semantics of existing EVM code.
## Test Cases
```
offset step op stack
0 0 PUSH1 3 []
1 1 JUMPSUB [3]
2 4 STOP []
3 2 JUMPDEST []
4 3 RETURNSUB []
```
This code should terminate after 4 steps with an empty stack.
```
offset step op stack
0 0 PUSH1 2 []
1 1 JUMPSUB [2]
2 2 JUMPDEST []
3 3 RETURNSUB []
```
This code should terminate after 4 steps with an empty stack.
```
offset step op stack
0 0 PUSH1 2 []
1 1 JUMPSUB [3]
2 8 STOP []
3 2 JUMPDEST []
4 3 PUSH1 7 []
5 4 JUMPSUB [7]
6 7 RETURNSUB []
7 5 JUMPDEST []
8 6 RETURNSUB []
```
This code should terminate after 8 steps with an empty stack.
## Implementations
No clients have implemented this proposal as of yet.
The new operators proposed here are implemented by the following pseudocode, which in eight lines adds a return stack and cases for `JUMPSUB` and `RETURNSUB` to a simple loop-and-switch interpreter.
```
bytecode[code_size]
data_stack[1024]
return_stack[1024]
push(return_stack, code_size)
PC = 0
while PC < code_size {
opcode = bytecode[PC]
switch opcode {
...
case JUMPSUB:
push(return_stack, PC)
PC = pop(data_stack)
continue
case RETURNSUB:
PC = pop(return_stack)
}
++PC
}
```
Execution of EVM bytecode begins with one value on the return stack—the size of the bytecode. The virtual byte of 0 at this offset is the EVM `STOP` opcode, so executing a `RETURNSUB` with no prior `JUMPSUB` executes a `STOP`. A `STOP` or `RETURN` ends the execution of the subroutine and the program.
### Costs and Codes
We suggest the cost of `JUMPSUB` should be _low_, and `RETURNSUB` should be _verylow_.
Measurement will tell. We suggest the following opcodes:
```
0xb3 JUMPSUB
0xb7 RETURNSUB
```
## Security Considerations
Program flow analysis frameworks will need to be updated to allow for a new type of branch -`JUMPSUB` - and new type of branching - `RETURNSUB` - which will cause a jump to a destination which is a `JUMPSUB`, not a `JUMPDEST`.
**Copyright and related rights waived via [CC0](https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/).**