mike cullerton
e74e44e8e5
Test for new script
2022-02-16 15:54:56 -05:00
Dan
0ad9843569
Dealing with some changes in SpiffWorkflow's latest release. I think this gets all tests passing again, and behaving as expected.
2022-02-16 10:46:46 -05:00
Dan
093741fa90
By default the system will start up the scheduled tasks, which is usually what you want, but in development
...
it can be kind of irritating for this stuff to be spinning up when you are trying to debug something, so just set
PROCESS_WAITING_TASKS to false in instance/config.py and voila!!
2022-02-15 14:07:09 -05:00
Dan
e9cf095810
Fixing a stupid mistake in the tests.
2022-02-11 11:54:46 -05:00
Dan
648383f2ea
for some reason jenkins doesn't like the spec_category_reorder test, so just doing it a different way.
2022-02-11 11:37:25 -05:00
Dan
7a99859108
fixing some failing test
2022-02-11 11:00:42 -05:00
Dan
4f2602c2f8
Assure sync_file_root can be set from an environment variable.
2022-02-11 10:19:25 -05:00
Dan
1b993ea227
updating readme
2022-02-11 09:47:49 -05:00
Dan
9a9e90dc30
Assure the import test has reference files.
2022-02-10 10:49:15 -05:00
Dan
df3f67601c
performance improvements. and last rements of load_example_data()
2022-02-09 23:29:39 -05:00
Dan
788e40a998
death to load_example_data() !!!!!
2022-02-09 22:13:02 -05:00
Dan
f12c4aba52
Refactor the workflow_spec_service so it doesn't cache anything, it always reads what it needs from the file system.
2022-02-09 21:06:55 -05:00
Dan
cf71f68ad9
all tests passing!!!!!!!!!!!!!
2022-02-09 15:30:07 -05:00
Dan
2cc20d4b9d
really need to avoid any kind of caching in the WorkflowSpecService
2022-02-09 14:43:32 -05:00
mike cullerton
b2d2491b72
Now, we have a list of strings, so get the value directly
2022-02-09 13:59:31 -05:00
mike cullerton
3b6f217443
specs, not workflows
2022-02-09 13:51:49 -05:00
Dan
89e02c6207
really need to avoid any kind of caching in the WorkflowSpecService
2022-02-09 13:37:57 -05:00
mike cullerton
aaf20a4de7
specs, not workflows
2022-02-09 13:06:33 -05:00
Dan
7e7821a5e7
more test passing
2022-02-09 13:01:26 -05:00
Dan
db93f9be4e
fixing the test_spec_files
2022-02-09 12:44:54 -05:00
Dan
02e496b0ef
Merge branch 'feature/spec_files_wthout_db' of github.com:sartography/cr-connect-workflow into feature/spec_files_wthout_db
2022-02-09 12:36:21 -05:00
Dan
5773eb99f3
fixing study status.
2022-02-09 12:36:16 -05:00
mike cullerton
881ee78e68
Merge branch 'feature/spec_files_wthout_db' of https://github.com/sartography/cr-connect-workflow into feature/spec_files_wthout_db
2022-02-09 12:14:57 -05:00
mike cullerton
d46dfdec40
Fixed the bad order test
2022-02-09 12:14:37 -05:00
Dan
e9fd76ed99
lookup service tests passing, but I need to revist this.
2022-02-09 12:11:51 -05:00
Dan
de6d7eee84
nearly all study tests work.
2022-02-09 12:03:45 -05:00
Dan
8e7c8c87c3
down to just 38 failed tests
2022-02-09 11:37:54 -05:00
mike cullerton
9576089e84
Reorder categories
2022-02-09 10:55:02 -05:00
mike cullerton
b2824286f0
Merge branch 'feature/spec_files_wthout_db' of https://github.com/sartography/cr-connect-workflow into feature/spec_files_wthout_db
2022-02-09 08:52:46 -05:00
mike cullerton
20ca31dd4d
category to category_id
2022-02-09 08:51:50 -05:00
Dan
cc915ac25a
refactoring the study service.
2022-02-09 08:50:00 -05:00
mike cullerton
0a4f63f048
category back to category_id
2022-02-08 16:39:31 -05:00
mike cullerton
5396226b0f
Fix reorder spec tests
2022-02-08 16:35:36 -05:00
mike cullerton
ccfb4b4cda
self was BaseTest in base_test and the test class in the actual test, so we couldn't find workflow_spec_service
2022-02-08 16:35:15 -05:00
Dan
25ecc1593a
test_workflow_spec_api passing.
2022-02-08 13:35:27 -05:00
alicia pritchett
112226e9b0
libraries on a spec are now just strings in a list
2022-02-08 11:38:43 -05:00
Dan
6c0e38c0a5
Merge branch 'feature/spec_files_wthout_db' of github.com:sartography/cr-connect-workflow into feature/spec_files_wthout_db
2022-02-08 11:31:56 -05:00
Dan
dc040f190e
got one more test to work.
2022-02-08 11:30:13 -05:00
mike cullerton
3f856355e2
Merge branch 'git-integration-596' into feature/spec_files_wthout_db
...
# Conflicts:
# config/testing.py
# crc/services/lookup_service.py
2022-02-08 10:38:03 -05:00
mike cullerton
dfb05764db
*** WIP ***
...
Committing to merge in the git integration code
2022-02-08 10:27:48 -05:00
alicia pritchett
a4fb00b0ed
remove bad imports
2022-02-07 15:28:52 -05:00
Dan
f40fb26a8f
a few more tests passing
2022-02-07 15:17:32 -05:00
Dan
4b8d193fb9
a few more tests passing
2022-02-07 14:58:25 -05:00
mike cullerton
5c3ab9a035
Move copy_files_to_file_system to base_test
2022-02-07 13:43:20 -05:00
Dan
d64853fa5b
two passing tests around the WorkflowSpecService
2022-02-07 13:34:13 -05:00
Dan
056f901f9a
WIP - its just caos right now.
2022-02-07 12:59:48 -05:00
Dan
ad095aaaf5
don't try to load the workflowspecservice too early.
2022-02-07 12:38:00 -05:00
Dan
abc17a8aff
load the workflow_spec_service from app to avoid frequent file scans.
2022-02-07 12:30:20 -05:00
Dan
1c384a78e9
the tests kind of try and run now ...
2022-02-07 12:18:32 -05:00
Dan
ff9b2694ae
Fix migrations that depend on removed models.
2022-02-07 11:56:22 -05:00