17 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
r4bbit
f1c1de7993 chore(StakeManager.spec): add two more MP related invariants
This adds two more invariants about multiplier points:

1. Initial multiplier points can never be less than an account's balance
2. Current multiplier points can never be less than initial MP
2024-03-12 16:56:50 +01:00
r4bbit
decd8a281d chore(StakeManager.spec): add MPCantBeGreaterThanMaxMP invariant
This commit introduces an invariant that ensures the generated
multiplier points can never be greater than the max boost multiplier
points.

See discussion in #80

Closes #80
2024-03-12 16:30:23 +01:00
r4bbit
4f590049d4 chore(StakeVault.spec): add rule to verify account and vault balance 2024-03-07 19:40:21 +01:00
r4bbit
544cc42f34 fix(StakeManager.spec): use filtered invariants for vacuous rules
This refactors the spec to no longer rely on the `simplification()`
but instead filter out the vacuous rules from the get go.

Using the `simplification()` previously was needed so that the prover
will ignore cases that revert by design. This made some invariants
vacuous.

Having vacuous rules or invariants is still considered a failure, so to
make get prover happy, we're using filtered invariants instead which
renders the `simplification` obsolete.
2024-03-05 10:21:26 -03:00
r4bbit
da007451a4 fix(StakeManager): ensure currentEpoch is 0 when migrating
A previous manager can only migrate once, because the migration address
is locked in. A **new** manager is always aware of its previous manager.

This means, when a migration happens and is initialized, we know for
sure it's always the first time this is happening.

We probably don't want a migration to take place if the new manager has
already processed epochs, so we're adding a check that its
`currentEpoch` must be `0`.

This also ensures one of its invariants isn't violated:

`epochsOnlyIncrease` and `highEpochsAreNull`.
2024-03-05 10:21:26 -03:00
r4bbit
0708bdd846 fix(StakeManager.spec): change simplification() to assume no prev manager
`simplification()` is used to have some rules make certain assumptions
so that they can pass. We need an additional simplification, stating
that `oldManager == address(0)`.

This means `oldManager` isn't set, meaning no `migrationInitialize()`
and similar functions have a non-reverting path.
2024-03-05 10:21:26 -03:00
r4bbit
e9f0077488 fix(StakeManager.spec): ensure revertsWhenNoMigration passes
The were changes in the contracts that caused this rule to fail.
Namely `migrateTo` shouldn't be reverting so this as been removed from
the rule and `transferNonPending` has been added as it was missing.
2024-03-05 10:21:26 -03:00
r4bbit
e723464245 fix(StakeManager.spec): make epochOnlyIncreases rule pass
This was failing due to `migrationInitialize()` allowing for resetting
or decreasing a `StakeManager`s `currentEpoch`.

In practice, however, this is not possible because a new manager can
only be called from an old manager and the old manager can only migrate
once. So if `migrationInitialize()` is called from an old manager, we
can safely assume it's the first time this is called, meaning the new
manager's `currentEpoch` must be `0` at this point in time.
2024-03-05 10:21:26 -03:00
r4bbit
2343213e0d chore(StakeVault.spec): comment out purposefully failing rule
This rule is only used for debugging purposes and serves no function for
production formal verification. Hence we're commenting it out.
2024-03-05 10:21:26 -03:00
Nurit Dor
e1bd0f31f8 chore: add cerora rules for totalSupplyBalance ghost rule 2024-03-05 10:21:26 -03:00
r4bbit
5cdd54a884 fix(StakeManager): don't allow migration initialization while migrating
This is actually a bug that the certora prover found.
The rule `epochStaysSameOnMigration` failed because a previous
`StakeManager` could call `migrationInitialize` and change
`currentEpoch` on a next `StakeManager`, even though the next `StakeManager`
might be in migration itself (which means the `currentEpoch` is now
allowed to change).

This commit fixes this by ensure `migrationInitialize()` will revert if
the `StakeManager` already has a `migration` on going.
2024-03-05 10:21:26 -03:00
r4bbit
8d09f0b2dc fix(Certora specs): ensure prover runs rules on currentContract
Since we're implementing rules for `StakeManager` migrations, we need
multiple instances inside the certora specs.

This results in the prover trying to run rules on the other
`StakeManager` instance as well, which isn't always desired,
as it causes some rules to fail, even though they'd pass if they'd be
executed only on the `currentContract`.

This commit makes the filter condition for relevant rules stronger, such
that the prover will not run them on the `newStakeManager` contract
instance.
2024-03-05 10:21:26 -03:00
r4bbit
1c52edbbd9 chore(Certora specs): comment out purposefully failing rule
We've introduced a rule that finds counter examples for all functions
that changes balances. This rule will always fail by definition, so
we're commenting it out to get CI green again.
2024-03-05 10:21:26 -03:00
r4bbit
d7ab130d30 fix(Certora specs): make specs compile again
There have been a bunch of breaking changes in the staking contract that
resulted in our specs not compiling.

This commit fixes this, however it does not yet ensure the prover is
satisfied.
2024-03-01 15:31:14 -03:00
Ricardo Guilherme Schmidt
03bc6559ae fix: StakeManager migration fixes and certora rules 2024-02-20 09:08:00 +01:00
Nurit Dor
14248a285b chore: certora setup for stakemanager and vault 2024-02-20 09:04:23 +01:00
r4bbit
cf7a8b6574
chore(ci): add certora CI integration (#40) 2023-12-11 15:10:41 +01:00