180 lines
11 KiB
Python
180 lines
11 KiB
Python
|
import pytest
|
||
|
|
from src.env_vars import NODE_1, NODE_2
|
||
|
|
from src.libs.common import delay
|
||
|
|
from src.libs.custom_logger import get_custom_logger
|
||
|
|
from src.node.waku_node import WakuNode
|
||
|
|
from src.steps.filter import StepsFilter
|
||
|
|
from src.steps.light_push import StepsLightPush
|
||
|
|
from src.steps.relay import StepsRelay
|
||
|
|
from src.steps.store import StepsStore
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
logger = get_custom_logger(__name__)
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
"""
|
||
|
|
In those tests we aim to combine multiple protocols/node types and create a more end-to-end scenario
|
||
|
|
"""
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
class TestE2E(StepsFilter, StepsStore, StepsRelay, StepsLightPush):
|
||
|
|
@pytest.fixture(scope="function", autouse=True)
|
||
|
|
def nodes(self):
|
||
|
|
self.node1 = WakuNode(NODE_2, f"node1_{self.test_id}")
|
||
|
|
self.node2 = WakuNode(NODE_1, f"node2_{self.test_id}")
|
||
|
|
self.node3 = WakuNode(NODE_2, f"node3_{self.test_id}")
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
def test_relay_receiving_node_not_connected_directly_to_relaying_node(self):
|
||
|
|
self.node1.start(relay="true")
|
||
|
|
self.node2.start(relay="true", discv5_bootstrap_node=self.node1.get_enr_uri())
|
||
|
|
self.node3.start(relay="true", discv5_bootstrap_node=self.node2.get_enr_uri())
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
self.node1.set_relay_subscriptions([self.test_pubsub_topic])
|
||
|
|
self.node2.set_relay_subscriptions([self.test_pubsub_topic])
|
||
|
|
self.node3.set_relay_subscriptions([self.test_pubsub_topic])
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
# for e2e scenarios I think waiting for autoconnection is important instead of forcing connection via API calls
|
||
|
|
# that's why the bellow code is commented to showcase this difference. In case we uncomment it, the connection will be faster
|
||
|
|
# self.add_node_peer(self.node2, [self.node1.get_multiaddr_with_id()])
|
||
|
|
# self.add_node_peer(self.node3, [self.node2.get_multiaddr_with_id()])
|
||
|
|
self.wait_for_autoconnection([self.node1, self.node2, self.node3], hard_wait=30)
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
# self.node1 relays and we check that self.node3 receives the message
|
||
|
|
self.check_published_message_reaches_relay_peer(sender=self.node1, peer_list=[self.node3], message_propagation_delay=1)
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
def test_filter_node_not_connected_directly_to_relaying_node(self):
|
||
|
|
self.node1.start(filter="true", relay="true")
|
||
|
|
self.node2.start(filter="true", relay="true", discv5_bootstrap_node=self.node1.get_enr_uri())
|
||
|
|
self.node3.start(relay="false", filternode=self.node2.get_multiaddr_with_id(), discv5_bootstrap_node=self.node2.get_enr_uri())
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
self.node1.set_relay_subscriptions([self.test_pubsub_topic])
|
||
|
|
self.node2.set_relay_subscriptions([self.test_pubsub_topic])
|
||
|
|
self.node3.set_filter_subscriptions({"requestId": "1", "contentFilters": [self.test_content_topic], "pubsubTopic": self.test_pubsub_topic})
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
# for e2e scenarios I think waiting for autoconnection is important instead of forcing connection via API calls
|
||
|
|
# that's why the bellow code is commented to showcase this difference. In case we uncomment it, the connection will be faster
|
||
|
|
# self.add_node_peer(self.node2, [self.node1.get_multiaddr_with_id()])
|
||
|
|
# self.add_node_peer(self.node3, [self.node2.get_multiaddr_with_id()])
|
||
|
|
self.wait_for_autoconnection([self.node1, self.node2, self.node3], hard_wait=30)
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
# self.node1 relays and we check that self.node3 receives the message
|
||
|
|
self.check_published_message_reaches_filter_peer(sender=self.node1, peer_list=[self.node3], message_propagation_delay=1)
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
def test_store_node_not_connected_directly_to_relaying_node(self):
|
||
|
|
self.node1.start(relay="true")
|
||
|
|
self.node2.start(store="true", relay="true", discv5_bootstrap_node=self.node1.get_enr_uri())
|
||
|
|
self.node3.start(relay="false", storenode=self.node2.get_multiaddr_with_id(), discv5_bootstrap_node=self.node2.get_enr_uri())
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
self.node1.set_relay_subscriptions([self.test_pubsub_topic])
|
||
|
|
self.node2.set_relay_subscriptions([self.test_pubsub_topic])
|
||
|
|
# self.node1 relays and we check that self.node3 receives the message
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
# for e2e scenarios I think waiting for autoconnection is important instead of forcing connection via API calls
|
||
|
|
# that's why the bellow code is commented to showcase this difference. In case we uncomment it, the connection will be faster
|
||
|
|
# self.add_node_peer(self.node2, [self.node1.get_multiaddr_with_id()])
|
||
|
|
# self.add_node_peer(self.node3, [self.node2.get_multiaddr_with_id()])
|
||
|
|
self.wait_for_autoconnection([self.node1, self.node2], hard_wait=30)
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
self.publish_message(sender=self.node1)
|
||
|
|
self.check_published_message_is_stored(page_size=50, ascending="true", store_node=self.node3)
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
def test_relay_receiving_node_not_connected_directly_to_lightpushing_node(self):
|
||
|
|
self.node1.start(lightpush="true", relay="true")
|
||
|
|
self.node2.start(
|
||
|
|
lightpush="true", relay="true", discv5_bootstrap_node=self.node1.get_enr_uri(), lightpushnode=self.node1.get_multiaddr_with_id()
|
||
|
|
)
|
||
|
|
self.node3.start(relay="true", discv5_bootstrap_node=self.node2.get_enr_uri())
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
self.node1.set_relay_subscriptions([self.test_pubsub_topic])
|
||
|
|
self.node2.set_relay_subscriptions([self.test_pubsub_topic])
|
||
|
|
self.node3.set_relay_subscriptions([self.test_pubsub_topic])
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
# for e2e scenarios I think waiting for autoconnection is important instead of forcing connection via API calls
|
||
|
|
# that's why the bellow code is commented to showcase this difference. In case we uncomment it, the connection will be faster
|
||
|
|
# self.add_node_peer(self.node2, [self.node1.get_multiaddr_with_id()])
|
||
|
|
# self.add_node_peer(self.node3, [self.node2.get_multiaddr_with_id()])
|
||
|
|
self.wait_for_autoconnection([self.node1, self.node2, self.node3], hard_wait=30)
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
# self.node1 light pushed and we check that self.node3 receives the message
|
||
|
|
self.check_light_pushed_message_reaches_receiving_peer(sender=self.node1, peer_list=[self.node3])
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
def test_filter_node_not_connected_directly_to_lightpushing_node(self):
|
||
|
|
self.node1.start(lightpush="true")
|
||
|
|
self.node2.start(
|
||
|
|
lightpush="true",
|
||
|
|
filter="true",
|
||
|
|
relay="true",
|
||
|
|
discv5_bootstrap_node=self.node1.get_enr_uri(),
|
||
|
|
lightpushnode=self.node1.get_multiaddr_with_id(),
|
||
|
|
)
|
||
|
|
self.node3.start(relay="false", filternode=self.node2.get_multiaddr_with_id(), discv5_bootstrap_node=self.node2.get_enr_uri())
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
self.node1.set_relay_subscriptions([self.test_pubsub_topic])
|
||
|
|
self.node2.set_relay_subscriptions([self.test_pubsub_topic])
|
||
|
|
self.node3.set_filter_subscriptions({"requestId": "1", "contentFilters": [self.test_content_topic], "pubsubTopic": self.test_pubsub_topic})
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
# for e2e scenarios I think waiting for autoconnection is important instead of forcing connection via API calls
|
||
|
|
# that's why the bellow code is commented to showcase this difference. In case we uncomment it, the connection will be faster
|
||
|
|
# self.add_node_peer(self.node2, [self.node1.get_multiaddr_with_id()])
|
||
|
|
# self.add_node_peer(self.node3, [self.node2.get_multiaddr_with_id()])
|
||
|
|
self.wait_for_autoconnection([self.node1, self.node2, self.node3], hard_wait=30)
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
# self.node1 light pushed and we check that self.node3 receives the message
|
||
|
|
self.node1.send_light_push_message(self.create_payload())
|
||
|
|
delay(1)
|
||
|
|
get_messages_response = self.get_filter_messages(self.test_content_topic, pubsub_topic=self.test_pubsub_topic, node=self.node3)
|
||
|
|
assert len(get_messages_response) == 1, f"Expected 1 message but got {len(get_messages_response)}"
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
def test_store_node_not_connected_directly_to_lightpushing_node(self):
|
||
|
|
self.node1.start(lightpush="true")
|
||
|
|
self.node2.start(
|
||
|
|
lightpush="true",
|
||
|
|
store="true",
|
||
|
|
relay="true",
|
||
|
|
discv5_bootstrap_node=self.node1.get_enr_uri(),
|
||
|
|
lightpushnode=self.node1.get_multiaddr_with_id(),
|
||
|
|
)
|
||
|
|
self.node3.start(relay="false", storenode=self.node2.get_multiaddr_with_id(), discv5_bootstrap_node=self.node2.get_enr_uri())
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
self.node1.set_relay_subscriptions([self.test_pubsub_topic])
|
||
|
|
self.node2.set_relay_subscriptions([self.test_pubsub_topic])
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
# for e2e scenarios I think waiting for autoconnection is important instead of forcing connection via API calls
|
||
|
|
# that's why the bellow code is commented to showcase this difference. In case we uncomment it, the connection will be faster
|
||
|
|
# self.add_node_peer(self.node2, [self.node1.get_multiaddr_with_id()])
|
||
|
|
# self.add_node_peer(self.node3, [self.node2.get_multiaddr_with_id()])
|
||
|
|
self.wait_for_autoconnection([self.node1, self.node2], hard_wait=30)
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
# self.node1 light pushed and we check that self.node3 receives the message
|
||
|
|
message = self.create_message()
|
||
|
|
self.node1.send_light_push_message(self.create_payload(message=message))
|
||
|
|
delay(1)
|
||
|
|
self.check_published_message_is_stored(page_size=50, ascending="true", store_node=self.node3, message_to_check=message)
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
def test_chain_of_relay_nodes(self):
|
||
|
|
self.node4 = WakuNode(NODE_2, f"node4_{self.test_id}")
|
||
|
|
self.node5 = WakuNode(NODE_2, f"node5_{self.test_id}")
|
||
|
|
self.node6 = WakuNode(NODE_2, f"node6_{self.test_id}")
|
||
|
|
self.node7 = WakuNode(NODE_2, f"node7_{self.test_id}")
|
||
|
|
self.node8 = WakuNode(NODE_2, f"node8_{self.test_id}")
|
||
|
|
self.node9 = WakuNode(NODE_2, f"node9_{self.test_id}")
|
||
|
|
self.node10 = WakuNode(NODE_2, f"node10_{self.test_id}")
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
self.node1.start(relay="true")
|
||
|
|
self.node2.start(relay="true", discv5_bootstrap_node=self.node1.get_enr_uri())
|
||
|
|
self.node3.start(relay="true", discv5_bootstrap_node=self.node2.get_enr_uri())
|
||
|
|
self.node4.start(relay="true", discv5_bootstrap_node=self.node3.get_enr_uri())
|
||
|
|
self.node5.start(relay="true", discv5_bootstrap_node=self.node4.get_enr_uri())
|
||
|
|
self.node6.start(relay="true", discv5_bootstrap_node=self.node5.get_enr_uri())
|
||
|
|
self.node7.start(relay="true", discv5_bootstrap_node=self.node6.get_enr_uri())
|
||
|
|
self.node8.start(relay="true", discv5_bootstrap_node=self.node7.get_enr_uri())
|
||
|
|
self.node9.start(relay="true", discv5_bootstrap_node=self.node8.get_enr_uri())
|
||
|
|
self.node10.start(relay="true", discv5_bootstrap_node=self.node9.get_enr_uri())
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
node_list = [self.node1, self.node2, self.node3, self.node4, self.node5, self.node6, self.node7, self.node8, self.node9, self.node10]
|
||
|
|
for node in node_list:
|
||
|
|
node.set_relay_subscriptions([self.test_pubsub_topic])
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
self.wait_for_autoconnection(node_list, hard_wait=30)
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
# self.node1 relays and we check that self.node10 receives the message
|
||
|
|
self.check_published_message_reaches_relay_peer(sender=self.node1, peer_list=[self.node10], message_propagation_delay=1)
|