This RFC describes set of instructions used across different [WAKU2](https://github.com/vacp2p/rfc-index/blob/7b443c1aab627894e3f22f5adfbb93f4c4eac4f6/waku/standards/core/10/waku2.md) implementations for improved reliability during usage of request-response protocols by a light node:
- [WAKU2-FILTER](https://github.com/vacp2p/rfc-index/blob/7b443c1aab627894e3f22f5adfbb93f4c4eac4f6/waku/standards/core/12/filter.md) - is used for receiving messages;
- Service node - provides services to other nodes such as relaying messages send by LightPush to the network or service messages from the network through Filter, usually serves responses;
- Service node failure - can mean various things depending on the protocol in use:
- generic protocol failure - request is timed out or failed without error codes;
- LightPush specific failure - refer to [error codes](../standards/core/lightpush.md#examples-of-possible-error-codes) and consider request a failure when it is clear that service node cannot serve any future request, for example when service node does not have any peers to relay and returns `NO_PEERS_TO_RELAY`;
- Filter specific failure - we consider service node failing when it cannot serve [subscribe](https://github.com/vacp2p/rfc-index/blob/7b443c1aab627894e3f22f5adfbb93f4c4eac4f6/waku/standards/core/12/filter.md#subscribe) or [ping](https://github.com/vacp2p/rfc-index/blob/7b443c1aab627894e3f22f5adfbb93f4c4eac4f6/waku/standards/core/12/filter.md#subscriber_ping) request with OK status;
Specifications of the mentioned protocols do not define some of the real world use cases that are often observed in unreliable network environment from the perspective of light nodes that are consumers of LightPush and/or Filter protocols.
Such use cases can be: recovery from offline state, decrease rate of missed messages, increase probability of messages being broadcasted within the network.
In case service node [fails](./req-res-reliability.md#definitions) to serve protocol request from a light node 3 times - light node should drop connection to it and a new service node should be connected and added to the pool instead.
More details about discovery can be found at [WAKU2 Discovery domain](https://github.com/vacp2p/rfc-index/blob/7b443c1aab627894e3f22f5adfbb93f4c4eac4f6/waku/standards/core/10/waku2.md#discovery-domain) or [RELAY-SHARDING Discovery](https://github.com/waku-org/specs/blob/master/standards/core/relay-sharding.md#discovery).
- When [Circuit V2](https://github.com/libp2p/specs/blob/master/relay/circuit-v2.md) multi-addresses discovered by a light node - it might avoid connecting such service nodes and wait for service nodes that can be connected directly;
- When light node discovers service nodes that implement needed Waku protocols - it should prioritize those that implement most recent version of protocol;
- Light node must connect only to those service nodes that participate in needed shard;
#### Continuous discovery
Light node must keep information about service nodes up to date.
For example when a service node is discovered second time,
When light node sends a message it must await for LightPush response from service node and check it for [possible error codes](../standards/core/lightpush.md#examples-of-possible-error-codes).
light node should try to re-send message after some interval and continue doing so until OK response is received or canceled.
Interval time can be arbitrary but we recommend starting with 1 second and increasing it on each failure during LightPush send.
Important to note that [per another recommendation](./req-res-reliability.md#pool-of-reliable-service-nodes) - light node should replace failing service node with another within pool of service nodes used by LightPush.
#### Retry missing messages
Light node can verity that network that is used at the moment has seen messages that were sent via LightPush earlier.
In order to do that light node should use [Store protocol](../standards/core/store.md) or [Filter protocol](https://github.com/vacp2p/rfc-index/blob/7b443c1aab627894e3f22f5adfbb93f4c4eac4f6/waku/standards/core/12/filter.md) to a different than the one used for LightPush service node.
By using Store protocol light node can query any service node that implements Store protocol and see if the messages that were sent in the past period were seen.
Due to [Store message eligibility](https://github.com/waku-org/specs/blob/master/standards/core/store.md#waku-message-store-eligibility) only some of the messages will be stored so there is a limit as to which messages can be verified by Store queries.
By using Filter protocol's active [subscription](https://github.com/vacp2p/rfc-index/blob/7b443c1aab627894e3f22f5adfbb93f4c4eac4f6/waku/standards/core/12/filter.md#filter-push) light node can verify that message that was sent through LightPush was seen by another service node in the network.
Filter protocol does not have such limitation as to type of messages received with subscription
but active subscription does not allow to see messages exchanged in the network while light node was offline.
In case some of the messages were not verified by any of the previous methods - they should be re-sent by LightPush.
To ensure that subscription is maintained by a service node and not closed - light node should do recurring [pings](https://github.com/vacp2p/rfc-index/blob/7b443c1aab627894e3f22f5adfbb93f4c4eac4f6/waku/standards/core/12/filter.md#subscriber_ping).
Our advice for light node to send ping requests once per minute.
In case light node does not receive OK response or it times out 3 times - such service node should be replaced as part of maintenance of [pool of reliable service nodes](./req-res-reliability.md#pool-of-reliable-service-nodes).
Right after such replace light node must create new subscription to newly connected service node as described in [Filter specification](https://github.com/vacp2p/rfc-index/blob/7b443c1aab627894e3f22f5adfbb93f4c4eac4f6/waku/standards/core/12/filter.md).
#### Redundant subscriptions for message loss mitigation
To mitigate possibility of messages not being delivered by a service node - we advice to consider using multiple Filter subscriptions.
Light node can initiate two subscriptions to the same content topic but to different service nodes.
While receiving messages through two subscriptions - duplicates must be dropped by using [deterministic message hashing](https://github.com/vacp2p/rfc-index/blob/main/waku/standards/core/14/message.md#deterministic-message-hashing).
Note that such approach increase bandwidth consumption proportionally to amount of extra subscriptions established and should be used with caution.
Network state should be monitored by light node and in case it goes offline - [regular pings](./req-res-reliability.md#regular-pings) must be stopped.
When network connection returns light node should initiate [Filter ping](https://github.com/vacp2p/rfc-index/blob/7b443c1aab627894e3f22f5adfbb93f4c4eac4f6/waku/standards/core/12/filter.md#subscriber_ping) to service nodes in use.
In case those pings fail light node must replace service nodes following advice of [pool of reliable service nodes](./req-res-reliability.md#pool-of-reliable-service-nodes) without waiting for multiple failures.
