rfc/content/docs/rfcs/53

slug	title	name	status	category	tags	editor	contributors
53	53/WAKU2-X3DH	X3DH usage for Waku payload encryption	draft	Standards Track	waku-application	Aaryamann Challani <aaryamann@status.im>	Andrea Piana <andreap@status.im> Pedro Pombeiro <pedro@status.im> Corey Petty <corey@status.im> Oskar Thorén <oskar@status.im> Dean Eigenmann <dean@status.im>

Abstract

This document describes a method that can be used to provide a secure channel between two peers, and thus provide confidentiality, integrity, authenticity and forward secrecy. It is transport-agnostic and works over asynchronous networks.

It builds on the X3DH and Double Ratchet specifications, with some adaptations to operate in a decentralized environment.

Motivation

Nodes on a network may want to communicate with each other in a secure manner, without other nodes network being able to read their messages.

Specification

Definitions

• Perfect Forward Secrecy is a feature of specific key-agreement protocols which provide assurances that session keys will not be compromised even if the private keys of the participants are compromised. Specifically, past messages cannot be decrypted by a third-party who manages to get a hold of a private key.

• Secret channel describes a communication channel where a Double Ratchet algorithm is in use.

Design Requirements

• Confidentiality: The adversary should not be able to learn what data is being exchanged between two Status clients.
• Authenticity: The adversary should not be able to cause either endpoint to accept data from any third party as though it came from the other endpoint.
• Forward Secrecy: The adversary should not be able to learn what data was exchanged between two clients if, at some later time, the adversary compromises one or both of the endpoints.
• Integrity: The adversary should not be able to cause either endpoint to accept data that has been tampered with.

All of these properties are ensured by the use of Signal's Double Ratchet

Conventions

Types used in this specification are defined using the Protobuf wire format.

Specification

End-to-End Encryption

End-to-end encryption (E2EE) takes place between two clients. The main cryptographic protocol is a Double Ratchet protocol, which is derived from the Off-the-Record protocol, using a different ratchet. The Waku v2 protocol subsequently encrypts the message payload, using symmetric key encryption. Furthermore, the concept of prekeys (through the use of X3DH) is used to allow the protocol to operate in an asynchronous environment. It is not necessary for two parties to be online at the same time to initiate an encrypted conversation.

Cryptographic Protocols

This protocol uses the following cryptographic primitives:

• X3DH

  • Elliptic curve Diffie-Hellman key exchange (secp256k1)
  • KECCAK-256
  • ECDSA
  • ECIES

• Double Ratchet

  • HMAC-SHA-256 as MAC
  • Elliptic curve Diffie-Hellman key exchange (Curve25519)
  • AES-256-CTR with HMAC-SHA-256 and IV derived alongside an encryption key

  The node achieves key derivation using HKDF.

Pre-keys

Every client SHOULD initially generate some key material which is stored locally:

• Identity keypair based on secp256k1 - IK
• A signed prekey based on secp256k1 - SPK
• A prekey signature - Sig(IK, Encode(SPK))

More details can be found in the X3DH Prekey bundle creation section of 2/ACCOUNT.

Prekey bundles MAY be extracted from any peer's messages, or found via searching for their specific topic, {IK}-contact-code.

The following methods can be used to retrieve prekey bundles from a peer's messages:

• contact codes;
• public and one-to-one chats;
• QR codes;
• ENS record;
• Decentralized permanent storage (e.g. Swarm, IPFS).
• Waku

Waku SHOULD be used for retrieving prekey bundles.

Since bundles stored in QR codes or ENS records cannot be updated to delete already used keys, the bundle MAY be rotated every 24 hours, and distributed via Waku.

Flow

The key exchange can be summarized as follows:

1. Initial key exchange: Two parties, Alice and Bob, exchange their prekey bundles, and derive a shared secret.

2. Double Ratchet: The two parties use the shared secret to derive a new encryption key for each message they send.

3. Chain key update: The two parties update their chain keys. The chain key is used to derive new encryption keys for future messages.

4. Message key derivation: The two parties derive a new message key from their chain key, and use it to encrypt a message.

1. Initial key exchange flow (X3DH)

Section 3 of the X3DH protocol describes the initial key exchange flow, with some additional context:

• The peers' identity keys IK_A and IK_B correspond to their public keys;
• Since it is not possible to guarantee that a prekey will be used only once in a decentralized world, the one-time prekey OPK_B is not used in this scenario;
• Nodes SHOULD not send Bundles to a centralized server, but instead provide them in a decentralized way as described in the Pre-keys section.

Alice retrieves Bob's prekey bundle, however it is not specific to Alice. It contains:

(reference wire format)

Wire format:

// X3DH prekey bundle
message Bundle {
  // Identity key 'IK_B'
  bytes identity = 1;
  // Signed prekey 'SPK_B' for each device, indexed by 'installation-id'
  map<string,SignedPreKey> signed_pre_keys = 2;
  // Prekey signature 'Sig(IK_B, Encode(SPK_B))'
  bytes signature = 4;
  // When the bundle was created locally
  int64 timestamp = 5;
}

(reference wire format)

message SignedPreKey {
  bytes signed_pre_key = 1;
  uint32 version = 2;
}

The signature is generated by sorting installation-id in lexicographical order, and concatenating the signed-pre-key and version:

installation-id-1signed-pre-key1version1installation-id2signed-pre-key2-version-2

2. Double Ratchet

Having established the initial shared secret SK through X3DH, it SHOULD be used to seed a Double Ratchet exchange between Alice and Bob.

Refer to the Double Ratchet spec for more details.

The initial message sent by Alice to Bob is sent as a top-level ProtocolMessage (reference wire format) containing a map of DirectMessageProtocol indexed by installation-id (reference wire format):

message ProtocolMessage {
  // The installation id of the sender
  string installation_id = 2;
  // A sequence of bundles
  repeated Bundle bundles = 3;
  // One to one message, encrypted, indexed by installation_id
  map<string,DirectMessageProtocol> direct_message = 101;
  // Public message, not encrypted
  bytes public_message = 102;
}

message EncryptedMessageProtocol {
  X3DHHeader X3DH_header = 1;
  DRHeader DR_header = 2; 
  DHHeader DH_header = 101;
  // Encrypted payload
  // if a bundle is available, contains payload encrypted with the Double Ratchet algorithm;
  // otherwise, payload encrypted with output key of DH exchange (no Perfect Forward Secrecy).
  bytes payload = 3;
}

Where:

• X3DH_header: the X3DHHeader field in DirectMessageProtocol contains:

  (reference wire format)

  message X3DHHeader {
    // Alice's ephemeral key `EK_A`
    bytes key = 1;
    // Bob's bundle signed prekey
    bytes id = 4;
  }
  

• DR_header: Double ratchet header (reference wire format). Used when Bob's public bundle is available:

  message DRHeader {
    // Alice's current ratchet public key (as mentioned in [DR spec section 2.2](https://signal.org/docs/specifications/doubleratchet/#symmetric-key-ratchet))
    bytes key = 1;
    // number of the message in the sending chain
    uint32 n = 2;
    // length of the previous sending chain
    uint32 pn = 3;
    // Bob's bundle ID
    bytes id = 4;
  }
  

• DH_header: Diffie-Hellman header (used when Bob's bundle is not available): (reference wire format)

  message DHHeader {
    // Alice's compressed ephemeral public key.
    bytes key = 1;
  }
  

3. Chain key update

The chain key MUST be updated according to the DR_Header received in the EncryptedMessageProtocol message, described in 2.Double Ratchet.

4. Message key derivation

The message key MUST be derived from a single ratchet step in the symmetric-key ratchet as described in Symmetric key ratchet

The message key MUST be used to encrypt the next message to be sent.

Security Considerations

1. Inherits the security considerations of X3DH and Double Ratchet.

2. Inherits the security considerations of the Waku v2 protocol.

3. The protocol is designed to be used in a decentralized manner, however, it is possible to use a centralized server to serve prekey bundles. In this case, the server is trusted.

Privacy Considerations

1. This protocol does not provide message unlinkability. It is possible to link messages signed by the same keypair.

Copyright

Copyright and related rights waived via CC0.

References

1. 5/SECURE-TRANSPORT
2. 10/WAKU2
3. X3DH
4. HKDF
5. Double Ratchet