mirror of https://github.com/vacp2p/rfc.git
Plausible raw draft to review
This commit is contained in:
parent
fb8f8cb66d
commit
d32aa2a465
|
@ -7,14 +7,14 @@ category: Informational
|
|||
tags: logos/reputation
|
||||
editor: Mark Evenson <mark.evenson@status.im>
|
||||
contributors:
|
||||
- Alvaro
|
||||
- Álvaro Castro-Castilla
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Abstract
|
||||
|
||||
We present Ininkgut, a deceptively simple algorithm for computing the
|
||||
reputation of other nodes in their performance of a shared alogrithm.
|
||||
|
||||
We present Ikingut: an algorithm for purely local computation of peer
|
||||
node reputation based on their observed performance of a shared
|
||||
computation.
|
||||
|
||||
# Background
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -33,10 +33,13 @@ node reputation is to
|
|||
- Providing a mechanism for bootstrapping networks, with a low
|
||||
number of nodes.
|
||||
|
||||
# Theory / Semantics
|
||||
# Theory
|
||||
|
||||
## Ikingut Algorithm
|
||||
|
||||
A deceptively simple algorithm for computing reputation of a other
|
||||
network nodes based on observed past performance.
|
||||
|
||||
### Concept
|
||||
|
||||
The Ikingut algorithm for reputation is a local heuristic computed
|
||||
|
@ -56,9 +59,9 @@ Other relevant characteristics of the algorithm are:
|
|||
functions.
|
||||
- Lightweight. It doesn’t perform long computations nor use a lot of
|
||||
memory.
|
||||
- Pluggable into Glacier and Snowball. It’s designed to fit well with
|
||||
swarm-like consensus algorithms. Moreover, it augments the consensus
|
||||
algorithm without altering it.
|
||||
- Pluggable into Glacier and Snowball [38/LOGOS-CONSENSUS][]. It’s
|
||||
designed to fit well with swarm-like consensus algorithms. Moreover,
|
||||
it augments the consensus algorithm without altering it.
|
||||
- Adaptive. It processes network and behavior changes fast.
|
||||
- Dynamic. It introduces new nodes consistently and fairly.
|
||||
- It is robust against strategic adversaries. We will see these in more detail below.
|
||||
|
@ -84,15 +87,14 @@ of the consensus algorithm.
|
|||
operation.
|
||||
3. If the resulting reputation is negative, add it to the trust
|
||||
score, using the following equation:
|
||||
|
||||
$$
|
||||
t_i := min(at_i, t_i + br_i)\\
|
||||
\text{where}\ 0 < a < 1 \ \text{and} \ b > 1
|
||||
t_i := min(at_i, t_i + br_i) \\
|
||||
\text{where}\ 0 < a < 1 \ \text{and} \ b > 1 \\
|
||||
$$
|
||||
|
||||
Where $a$ and $b$ are constants used to manipulate how much
|
||||
where $a$ and $b$ are constants used to manipulate how much
|
||||
momentum is applied.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
**Pseudocode:**
|
||||
|
||||
```python
|
||||
|
@ -145,8 +147,19 @@ from these two operations:
|
|||
- Bring the opportunity of building reputation faster.
|
||||
- Ensure accumulation of negative scores for misbehaving nodes.
|
||||
|
||||
# Security/Privacy Considerations
|
||||
# Implementation status
|
||||
|
||||
Incomplete. No publically known implementations.
|
||||
|
||||
# Sovereignty Considerations
|
||||
|
||||
## Privacy
|
||||
|
||||
Computation of reputation is purely local from observed behavior.
|
||||
|
||||
## Security
|
||||
|
||||
No model constructed. No current tests.
|
||||
|
||||
# Copyright
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -157,5 +170,7 @@ Copyright and related rights waived via
|
|||
|
||||
## informative
|
||||
|
||||
#. 38/LOGOS-CONSENSUS
|
||||
#. Rocket, Team, Maofan Yin, Kevin Sekniqi, Robbert van Renesse, and Emin Gün Sirer. “Scalable and Probabilistic Leaderless BFT Consensus through Metastability.” arXiv, August 24, 2020. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1906.08936.
|
||||
#. [38/LOGOS-CONSENSUS](https://github.com/vacp2p/rfc/pull/512)
|
||||
#. [Rocket, Team, Maofan Yin, Kevin Sekniqi, Robbert van Renesse, and Emin Gün Sirer. “Scalable and Probabilistic Leaderless BFT Consensus through Metastability.” arXiv, August 24, 2020.](https://https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1906.08936) TODO: add IPFS
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue