2019-09-30 05:08:04 +00:00
|
|
|
# Remote log specification
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
> Version: 0.1.0 (Draft)
|
|
|
|
>
|
|
|
|
> Authors: Oskar Thorén oskar@status.im, Dean Eigenmann dean@status.im
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Table of Contents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- [Abstract](#abstract)
|
|
|
|
- [Definitions](#definitions)
|
|
|
|
- [Wire Protocol](#wire-protocol)
|
|
|
|
- [Secure Transport, storage, and name system](#secure-transport-storage-and-name-system)
|
|
|
|
- [Payloads](#payloads)
|
|
|
|
- [Synchronization](#synchronization)
|
|
|
|
- [Roles](#roles)
|
|
|
|
- [Flow](#flow)
|
|
|
|
- [Remote log](#remote-log)
|
|
|
|
- [Next page semantics](#next-page-semantics)
|
|
|
|
- [Interaction with MVDS](#interaction-with-mvds)
|
|
|
|
- [Footnotes](#footnotes)
|
|
|
|
- [Acknowledgements](#acknowledgements)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A remote log is a replication of a local log. This means a node can read data from a node that is offline.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This specification is complemented by a proof of concept implementation <sup>1</sup>.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Definitions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Term | Definition |
|
|
|
|
| ----------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
|
|
|
|
| CAS | Content-addressed storage. Stores data that can be addressed by its hash. |
|
|
|
|
| NS | Name system. Associates mutable data to a name. |
|
|
|
|
| Remote log | Replication of a local log at a different location. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Wire Protocol
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Secure Transport, storage, and name system
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This specification does not define anything related to to: secure transport,
|
|
|
|
content addressed storage, or the name system. It is assumed these capabilities
|
|
|
|
are abstracted away in such a way that any such protocol can easily be
|
|
|
|
implemented.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<!-- TODO: Elaborate on properties required here. -->
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Payloads
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payloads are implemented using [protocol buffers v3](https://developers.google.com/protocol-buffers/).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
**CAS service**:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
```protobuf
|
2019-10-01 03:34:24 +00:00
|
|
|
syntax = "proto3";
|
|
|
|
|
2019-09-30 05:08:04 +00:00
|
|
|
package vac.cas;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
service CAS {
|
|
|
|
rpc Add(Content) returns (Address) {}
|
|
|
|
rpc Get(Address) returns (Content) {}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
message Address {
|
|
|
|
bytes id = 1;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
message Content {
|
|
|
|
bytes data = 1;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<!-- XXX/TODO: Can we get rid of the id/data complication and just use bytes? -->
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
**NS service**:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
```protobuf
|
2019-10-01 03:34:24 +00:00
|
|
|
syntax = "proto3";
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
package vac.cas;
|
|
|
|
|
2019-09-30 05:08:04 +00:00
|
|
|
service NS {
|
|
|
|
rpc Update(NameUpdate) returns (Response) {}
|
|
|
|
rpc Fetch(Query) returns (Content) {}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
message NameUpdate {
|
|
|
|
string name = 1;
|
|
|
|
bytes content = 2;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
message Query {
|
|
|
|
string name = 1;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
message Content {
|
|
|
|
bytes data = 1;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
message Response {
|
|
|
|
bytes data = 1;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<!-- XXX: Response and data type a bit weird, Ok/Err enum? -->
|
|
|
|
<!-- TODO: Do we want NameInit here? -->
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
**Remote log:**
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
```protobuf
|
2019-10-01 03:34:24 +00:00
|
|
|
syntax = "proto3";
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
package vac.cas;
|
|
|
|
|
2019-09-30 05:08:04 +00:00
|
|
|
message RemoteLog {
|
|
|
|
repeated Pair pair = 1;
|
|
|
|
bytes tail = 2;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
message Pair {
|
|
|
|
bytes remoteHash = 1;
|
|
|
|
bytes localHash = 2;
|
|
|
|
bytes data = 3;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<!-- TODO: Better name for Pair, Mapping? -->
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<!-- TODO: Extend pair with (optional) data -->
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Synchronization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<!-- TODO: Elaborate on interaction with MVDS, especially with what messages are synced, etc -->
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Roles
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are four fundamental roles:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. Alice
|
|
|
|
2. Bob
|
|
|
|
2. Name system (NS)
|
|
|
|
3. Content-addressed storage (CAS)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The *remote log* protobuf is what is stored at the Name system.
|
|
|
|
|
2019-10-01 03:34:24 +00:00
|
|
|
"Bob" can represent anything from 0 to N participants. Unlike Alice, Bob only needs read-only access to NS and CAS.
|
2019-09-30 05:08:04 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Flow
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<!-- diagram -->
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p align="center">
|
2019-10-01 04:52:02 +00:00
|
|
|
<img src="./assets/remotelog/remote-log.png" />
|
2019-09-30 05:08:04 +00:00
|
|
|
<br />
|
|
|
|
Figure 1: Remote log data synchronization.
|
|
|
|
</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Remote log
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The remote log lets receiving nodes know what data they are missing. Depending
|
|
|
|
on the specific requirements and capabilities of the nodes and name system, the
|
|
|
|
information can be referred to differently. We distinguish between three rough
|
|
|
|
modes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. Fully replicated log
|
|
|
|
2. Normal sized page with CAS mapping
|
|
|
|
3. "Linked list" mode - minimally sized page with CAS mapping
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
**Data format:**
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
| H1_3 | H2_3 |
|
|
|
|
| H1_2 | H2_2 |
|
|
|
|
| H1_1 | H2_1 |
|
|
|
|
| ------------|
|
|
|
|
| next_page |
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Here the upper section indicates a list of ordered pairs, and the lower section
|
|
|
|
contains the address for the next page chunk. `H1` is the native hash function,
|
|
|
|
and `H2` is the one used by the CAS. The numbers corresponds to the messages.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To indicate which CAS is used, a remote log SHOULD use a multiaddr.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
**Embedded data:**
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A remote log MAY also choose to embed the wire payloads that corresponds to the
|
|
|
|
native hash. This bypasses the need for a dedicated CAS and additional
|
|
|
|
round-trips, with a trade-off in bandwidth usage.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
| H1_3 | | C_3 |
|
|
|
|
| H1_2 | | C_2 |
|
|
|
|
| H1_1 | | C_1 |
|
|
|
|
| -------------|
|
|
|
|
| next_page |
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Here `C` stands for the content that would be stored at the CAS.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Both patterns can be used in parallel, e,g. by storing the last `k` messages
|
|
|
|
directly and use CAS pointers for the rest. Together with the `next_page` page
|
|
|
|
semantics, this gives users flexibility in terms of bandwidth and
|
|
|
|
latency/indirection, all the way from a simple linked list to a fully replicated
|
|
|
|
log. The latter is useful for things like backups on durable storage.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Next page semantics
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The pointer to the 'next page' is another remote log entry, at a previous point
|
|
|
|
in time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<!-- TODO: Determine requirement re overlapping, adjacent, and/or missing entries -->
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Interaction with MVDS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TBD.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<!-- TODO: Elaborate on interaction with MVDS, especially with what messages are synced, etc -->
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Footnotes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. <https://github.com/vacp2p/research/tree/master/remote_log>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Acknowledgements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TBD.
|