If basically only full nodes set PoW to 0 then it be fine. But if light nodes also set this (afair they do) we have a compatibility issue. Though we also have mailservers.
Simplest might might be to basically send both envelopes, just take out the data thing:
- v1 [ expiry ttl topic data nonce ]
- v2 [ ... data ... ]
### Get rid of privileged point of node for RPC?
We could have JSON RPC for now and then use alt method later. We need to make
sure the interface with Stimbus and Core/Desktop makes sense.
It'd be useful if a node in browser could use another node without giving away
private keys (WalletConnect, e.g.).
### Are filters a useful abstraction?
Not sure I like this filter businesss, just deliver on a topic. If we want to do
that it can be done separately with a shim and have that specified at a
different layer. Removing coupling of routing and crypto.
### Consumer spec
Consumer: https://specs.status.im/spec/10
### Factoring out
Separate out into constituent pieces, keep main spec small here. What are the pieces?
- RPC/Node API
- Filter shim / crypto key compatibility
- Data field
- Waku v1 bridge
### App topics and waku topics
Ensure path forward for sharding topics. See Eth2 networking spec too.
Ensure topic interest in payload (not for routing, only edge nodes). Current Waku topics.
### Clarity of purpose
Make it very clear what we provide over e.g. FloodSub.
*NOTE: Should contain protobuf definitions that cover essentials of Waku v1. In cases where it doesn't cover, we can defer to siblings/child specs, e.g. such as the data field for encryption, etc.*
## Changelog
TODO
## Copyright
Copyright and related rights waived via [CC0](https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/).