mirror of https://github.com/status-im/swarms.git
Remove message ordering (#234)
This commit is contained in:
parent
110c4766c1
commit
f4a6519028
|
@ -1,41 +0,0 @@
|
|||
## Preamble
|
||||
|
||||
Idea: #117-message-ordering
|
||||
Title: Message ordering
|
||||
Status: Draft
|
||||
Created: 2018-03-29
|
||||
|
||||
## Summary
|
||||
|
||||
Addresses point 2 and 3 of https://github.com/status-im/ideas/issues/99 .
|
||||
|
||||
Define, document and implement message ordering for 1-to-1, group and public chats so that we can give the best UX experience to the end user.
|
||||
|
||||
## Swarm Participants
|
||||
|
||||
- Lead & PM: @cammellos
|
||||
- Testing & Evaluation:
|
||||
- UX/Design:
|
||||
|
||||
## Product Overview
|
||||
|
||||
Because status is a fully decentralized app, message ordering is non-trivial and needs careful thinking in terms of UX, as some constrainsts needs to be taken into consideration.
|
||||
|
||||
Currently message ordering in the chat is by the time the message has been received which results in out-of-order messages and potentially different order on different devices.
|
||||
|
||||
The primary aim of this swarm is to define which message ordering gives users the best UX experience and implement the changes necessary (if any).
|
||||
|
||||
**Goals**
|
||||
- Define, document and implement ordering of messages for 1-to-1/group/public chats
|
||||
|
||||
### Exit criteria
|
||||
|
||||
- Message ordering is clearly defined and documented, including the rationale behind the choices made
|
||||
- Code reflecting the choice made is written and released
|
||||
- Message ordering implementation is covered by integration tests (at least 80% coverage, as per OKR)
|
||||
|
||||
### Success metrics
|
||||
|
||||
- A/B testing of different implementations clearly shows a preference for the chosen ordering
|
||||
- Ordering of messages can be understood by the end-user through documentation (survey)
|
||||
- Implementation of ordering can be understood by developers just by reading the code/tests (survey)
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue