From c4e72b9d34478c19b4f10784adc8c17c08b4bbde Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Oskar Thoren <ot@oskarthoren.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2018 18:06:21 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] Add 88 dapp catalog draft

---
 ideas/88-dapp-catalog.md | 89 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 89 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 ideas/88-dapp-catalog.md

diff --git a/ideas/88-dapp-catalog.md b/ideas/88-dapp-catalog.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..997a800
--- /dev/null
+++ b/ideas/88-dapp-catalog.md
@@ -0,0 +1,89 @@
+## Preamble
+
+    Idea: 88
+    Title: DApp Catalog
+    Status: Draft
+    Created: 2018-03-12
+
+## Summary
+
+Interacting with DApps is in the very core of Status. In fact, the shortest description we have for Status is *Mobile Ethereum OS (or Browser)*. 
+
+The problem is that new users do not really get a chance to see this aspect of Status, simply because there are very few DApps accessible directly through Status. The only way to find new DApps is on external web sites or search engines. Having to use an external app to access a core feature of our app is bad UX. Furthermore, users who are completely new to these technologies and generally unfamiliar with the concept of DApps might not even think to look for them and would only use Status as a messenger or possibly a wallet.
+
+Briefly put, the minimum we need to provide is a nice selection of DApps so that our users could use our Browser feature.
+
+We had two brainstorming sessions during the Bangkok offsite. The notes from there are on the link below, please do not hesitate to comment:
+
+ https://docs.google.com/document/d/11MRsAO8GdIKVB0bk-osld-cYMMWDOVxB012QHPkQ6_k/edit?usp=sharing
+
+## Swarm Participants
+TBA
+
+- Lead Contributor: @goranjovic
+- Testing & Evaluation: @asemiankevich 
+- Contributor: @lukaszfryc 
+- Contributor: <!-- @username -->
+- PM: <!--- @username -->
+- UX (if relevant): <!-- @username -->
+<!-- - Contributor: @username -->
+
+## Product Overview
+
+Objectives:
+
+1. Provide a definition of decentralized apps
+2. Provide clear inclusion criteria that dapps need to conform with in order to be listed in our catalog
+3. Perform some research o existing dapps for better understanding. For ex https://dappradar.com/
+4. Create the initial catalog 
+5. Provide a transparent and simple process for inclusion of new entries
+
+Key results:
+
+1. Users are able to easily use Status as a browser, having access to a nice and representative list of dapps.
+2. New users are introduced to the concept o dapps and why decentralization matters
+3. Developers who want to list their dapp in our catalog have a simple and fair process to do so and clear criteria their dapp needs to meet.
+
+Additional notes:
+
+ - We may want to add some kind of user rating to allow users to help each other in dapp selection. This is completely independent from the review criteria that a dapp needs to meet in order to be included in the catalog. 
+- Inclusion criteria should not contain any subjective criteria such as UX or matters of taste. These concerns should be left to end users to decide.
+- We may use Status Open Bounty for the review process. The catalog could be a repository with a list of dapps, new entries could be submitted as pull requests and then reviewers would allow or decline based on the criteria. The exact incentivization strategy remains to be decided (e.g. dapp authors could stake some amount of money, reviewers would be rewarded, etc.)
+- We can use a separate repo for the catalog. In fact, DApp Catalog itself could be a dapp.
+
+<!-- A short (~200 word) description and motivation of the Idea. Without clear explanation the Idea should not proceed. Can include User Stories -->
+<!-- Testing/Evaluation role accepts responsbility to checkin at Goal dates, -->
+<!-- forces discussion to continue implementation or recommend disband and post-mortem. -->
+
+### Product Description
+
+TBA
+
+<!-- What functionality are you adding? What will this look like from a user perspective? Why is this important? -->
+
+### Requirements & Dependencies
+<!-- Are there bugs or feature requests in other repositories that are part of this Idea? -->
+<!-- There is no approval unless the idea requires to be reviewed by supporting organelles (Financial, Hiring, or Design). -->
+<!-- The Swarm must develop a fully fleshed out Requirements document for the idea to proceed, to the satisfaction of participants. -->
+
+### Minimum Viable Product
+<!-- Mandatory, completes the Idea in the fastest route possible, can be hacky, needed to feel progress. See https://imgur.com/a/HVlw3 -->
+Goal Date: <!-- Date for evaluation in ISO 8601 (yyyy-mm-dd) format --> 
+
+Description: <!-- Description of Deliverables-->
+
+## Dates
+Goal Date: <!-- Date for evaluation in ISO 8601 (yyyy-mm-dd) format --> 
+
+Description: <!-- Description of Deliverables-->
+
+Testing Days required: <!-- Days required at the end of development for testing -->
+
+## Success Metrics
+<!-- Assuming the idea ships, what would success look like? What are the most important metrics that you would move?
+
+## Supporting Role Communication
+<!-- Once Requirements and Goals are fleshed out, then it should be communicated to supporting organelles if required -->
+
+## Copyright
+Copyright and related rights waived via [CC0](https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/).