Extended glossary and added user story 2

This commit is contained in:
Frank Mueller 2017-12-05 16:38:58 +01:00
parent ddb5038420
commit af7c3cc25f
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: 43233E3FD88D314E
4 changed files with 53 additions and 10 deletions

View File

@ -1,5 +1,8 @@
# Glossary
| Term | Meaning |
|--------------------|--------------------------------------------------|
| Chat | Textual communication between two or more users. |
| Term | Meaning |
| ---- | ------- |
| Chat | Textual communication between two users. |
| Chat Room | Grouping of users chatting about a topic or having any other kind of relation. Opposite to bilateral chats. Chat rooms have one owner and possible multiple moderators. |
| Public Group Chat | Chat room without restrictions for users to join. Opposite to private chat rooms needing an invitation by the owner or a moderator. |
| SNT Burn Rate | ??? |

View File

@ -1,9 +1,9 @@
# Roles
| Role | Description |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------|
| Owner | Creator and owner of a chat. |
| Moderator | User with rights to moderate a chat. |
| User | Chat user without special rights. |
| Role | Description |
| ---- | ----------- |
| Owner | Creator and owner of a chat. |
| Moderator | User with rights to moderate a chat. |
| User | Chat user without special rights. |
| Contract Developer | Developer of contracts especially for chats. |
| Contract Provider | Provider of contracts especially for chats. |
| Contract Provider | Provider of contracts especially for chats. |

View File

@ -37,4 +37,4 @@ Also in other chat rooms with both users *User A* doesn't see any post of *User
participants and can be selected to open a menu like for blocking? Or does the chat
room menu an option to list all blocked users and those can be unblocked there?
- Question: How is quoting, mentioning, or forwarding of *User B* messages by *User C*
handled?
handled? Are those visible to *User A*?

View File

@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
# User Story 2: Reducing SPAM
## Description
*User A* enters a public group chat. *User A* discovers that messages in the chat
feed are low quality (SPAM). *User A* adjusts the required SNT burn value until the
quality of the chat feed improves.
## Trigger
Wish of *User A* to reduce SPAM in a public group chat.
## Actors
- *User A*
## Pre-Condition
A public chat room with traffic and *User A* as a user. *User A* decides that the
quality of the feed doesn't match her quality requirements, the messages contain
too much SPAM.
## Post-Condition
After adjustment of the required SNT burn value the amount of SPAM reduces.
## Flow
- *User A* enters a public chat room and discovers the low feed quality.
- *User A* selects his settings for the chat room and changes the SNT burn rate.
- After changing the burn rate the amount of SPAM varies.
## Remarks
- Question: Do chat rooms have a standard burn rate?
- Question: Do chat rooms have upper or lower limits for burn rate?
- Question: How does the SNT burn rate of *User A* influences the delivery
of low or high quality messages?
- Question: Can a sender influence what it's worth to her having a message
delivered?