status-im/swarms
2
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/status-im/swarms.git synced 2025-02-26 00:25:22 +00:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Review pt. 1

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Richard Ramos 2019-01-04 12:57:30 -04:00
parent ac0290d3c2
commit a74a85eba2
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: 5660EFE0444098A8
1 changed files with 9 additions and 2 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

11
ideas/322-dao.md
View File

@ -23,6 +23,9 @@ DAO
One major drawback in legacy social networks is the lack of influence their users possess over the networks themselves. They are often powerless in having a say on how the platform evolves. We aim to democratise this power, giving stakeholders a direct influence over all decisions within the network, including how the software is developed with voting and allocation of funds via liquid pledging
#### Goals
- Funding done on the mainnet. A goal is to have funds currently in the multisig of the GMBH to start moving to DAO’s for allocation to projects.
## Contributors
@ -50,11 +53,15 @@ One major drawback in legacy social networks is the lack of influence their user
- Liquid Pledge uses Solidity < `0.5.0`. Migrating to 0.5.0 would make debugging easier thanks to revert exceptions including an error message. However, the project uses OpenZeppelin and Aragon's contracts which would make the migration to `0.5.0` more complicated.
- What information is important to be displayed to funders, delegates and projects?
- What is the ideal specification for a "Pledge"?
#### Key assumption to test:
- Funding done on the mainnet. A goal is to have funds currently in the multisig of the GMBH to start moving to DAO’s for allocation to projects.
- Voting is described as part of governance in the Status whitepaper. The voting dapp is currently used as a signaling tool, and it does not have in-chain consequences. Will voting be used also for project funding? (via topic democracy or other mechanism)
- Principles signing should be required in order to access the funds. A plugin could be made for this, or in case identities are implemented, maybe a Claim could be created for an identity once the principles are signed.
- Are delegates needed?
- Is directly funding a specific purpose Aragon DAOs from the primary multisig easier to manage?
## Specification
TODO