From 57ad2e7139c45ffdbad675719be78164507f019b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ricardo Guilherme Schmidt <3esmit@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2018 02:24:34 -0300
Subject: [PATCH] lint

---
 ideas/073-gas-abstraction.md | 10 ++++++----
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/ideas/073-gas-abstraction.md b/ideas/073-gas-abstraction.md
index 7ab9993..85feebd 100644
--- a/ideas/073-gas-abstraction.md
+++ b/ideas/073-gas-abstraction.md
@@ -1,10 +1,12 @@
+# Gas Abstraction
+
 ## Preamble
 
-    Idea: 73
+    Idea: 073-gas-abstraction
     Title: Gas Abstraction
     Status: In Progress
     Created: 2018-02-01
-    Requires: #145
+    Requires: 145-identity
 
 ## Summary
 
@@ -19,7 +21,6 @@ Users would sign a message request to contracts which will use user's balance of
 - UX (Status): 
 - Contributor/Testing: @iurimatias 
 
-
 ## Product Overview
 
 A barrier for user adoption to blockchain through Status would be the need of holding two tokens for paying fees, ether gas for moving the [SNT](https://etherscan.io/address/0x744d70fdbe2ba4cf95131626614a1763df805b9e#readContract) fee from user balance to decentralized service provider. 
@@ -46,7 +47,7 @@ Identity UX should allow user to choose what token it wants to use as gas price.
 
 ### Requirements & Dependancies
 
-Idea [#145](https://github.com/status-im/ideas/pull/145) is important to seamless and safe integration of gas abstraction for any type of call.
+Idea [145-identity](https://github.com/status-im/ideas/pull/145) is important to seamless and safe integration of gas abstraction for any type of call.
 Implemention of [EIP#191](https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/issues/191) is somewhat important, specially for making signature verification slightly gas cheaper.
 
 ### Minimum Viable Product
@@ -73,6 +74,7 @@ Description:
 - Moving SNT to other address from SNTController terms (paying gas in SNT)
 
 #### UX Integration
+
 Goal Date: 2018-05-15
 Description:
 - User can create Identity paying in SNT.