status-im/swarms
2
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/status-im/swarms.git synced 2025-02-23 07:08:19 +00:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Wiki Activity

fixes for @oskarth review

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Ricardo Guilherme Schmidt 2018-05-02 10:03:46 -03:00
parent 4c0fa2c0f1
commit 086252b1a5
1 changed files with 25 additions and 7 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

32
ideas/172-topic-democracy.md
View File

@ -1,4 +1,22 @@
# Democracy ---
id: 172-topic-democracy
title: Subjective Delegation Liquid Democracy
status: Draft
created: 2018-04-15
category: core
contributors:
- 3esmit
exit-criteria: yes
success-metrics: yes
clear-roles: no
future-iterations: no
roles-needed:
- UX
- PM
- Clojure dev
okrs:
- "[P2]: SNT is a powerful utility in Status"
---
## Preamble ## Preamble
@ -8,7 +26,7 @@
Created: 2018-04-15 Created: 2018-04-15
## Summary ## Summary
A democracy where you can specify delegate for carbon-voting specific multi level topics or fallback to a predefined defaults if none set. A democracy where you can specify delegate for carbon-voting proposals with specific multilevel governance delegation topics, or fallback to a predefined defaults if none set.
## Swarm Participants ## Swarm Participants
- Lead Contributor: Ricardo Guilherme Schmidt - Lead Contributor: Ricardo Guilherme Schmidt
@ -44,7 +62,7 @@ When users don't vote and don't delegate, their influence would be delegated to
### Requirements & Dependencies ### Requirements & Dependencies
- MiniMeToken - MiniMeToken: Important because it allows lookup of snapshot balances in a certain block. This make possible safe tabulation without locking user balances.
### Minimum Viable Product ### Minimum Viable Product
<!-- Mandatory, completes the Idea in the fastest route possible, can be hacky, needed to feel progress. See https://imgur.com/a/HVlw3 --> <!-- Mandatory, completes the Idea in the fastest route possible, can be hacky, needed to feel progress. See https://imgur.com/a/HVlw3 -->
@ -59,11 +77,11 @@ Goal Date: <!-- Date for evaluation in ISO 8601 (yyyy-mm-dd) format -->
Description: Topic Democracy as "opinion" pool as experimental. Description: Topic Democracy as "opinion" pool as experimental.
- System is deployed in mainnet. - System is deployed in mainnet.
- Users can cast opinion as vote through Status. - Users can cast opinion as vote using SNT for Status proposals throug Topic Democracy..
- Users can delegate opinion through Status. - Users can delegate opinion for Status proposals using SNT through Topic Democracy.
- Inchain tabulation is not required. - Inchain tabulation is not required, because results can be calculated offchain and as no action would be taken by the result, inchain tabulation would be waste of gas.
- Topic Democracy don't owns SNT. - Topic Democracy don't owns SNT.
- Users are asked to approve proposal to upgrade into DAO Governance. - Users are asked to approve proposal to upgrade into DAO Governance. When community decides this system is ready to take control of Status authority, a pool can be done and tabulated inchain to transfer control to Topic Democracy over a Topic Democracy proposal.
- First DAO Governance can control network/assets by a multisig between current authority. - First DAO Governance can control network/assets by a multisig between current authority.
## Success Metrics ## Success Metrics