mirror of
https://github.com/status-im/swarms.git
synced 2025-02-22 14:48:17 +00:00
fixes for @oskarth review
This commit is contained in:
parent
4c0fa2c0f1
commit
086252b1a5
@ -1,4 +1,22 @@
|
||||
# Democracy
|
||||
---
|
||||
id: 172-topic-democracy
|
||||
title: Subjective Delegation Liquid Democracy
|
||||
status: Draft
|
||||
created: 2018-04-15
|
||||
category: core
|
||||
contributors:
|
||||
- 3esmit
|
||||
exit-criteria: yes
|
||||
success-metrics: yes
|
||||
clear-roles: no
|
||||
future-iterations: no
|
||||
roles-needed:
|
||||
- UX
|
||||
- PM
|
||||
- Clojure dev
|
||||
okrs:
|
||||
- "[P2]: SNT is a powerful utility in Status"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Preamble
|
||||
|
||||
@ -8,7 +26,7 @@
|
||||
Created: 2018-04-15
|
||||
|
||||
## Summary
|
||||
A democracy where you can specify delegate for carbon-voting specific multi level topics or fallback to a predefined defaults if none set.
|
||||
A democracy where you can specify delegate for carbon-voting proposals with specific multilevel governance delegation topics, or fallback to a predefined defaults if none set.
|
||||
|
||||
## Swarm Participants
|
||||
- Lead Contributor: Ricardo Guilherme Schmidt
|
||||
@ -44,7 +62,7 @@ When users don't vote and don't delegate, their influence would be delegated to
|
||||
|
||||
### Requirements & Dependencies
|
||||
|
||||
- MiniMeToken
|
||||
- MiniMeToken: Important because it allows lookup of snapshot balances in a certain block. This make possible safe tabulation without locking user balances.
|
||||
|
||||
### Minimum Viable Product
|
||||
<!-- Mandatory, completes the Idea in the fastest route possible, can be hacky, needed to feel progress. See https://imgur.com/a/HVlw3 -->
|
||||
@ -59,11 +77,11 @@ Goal Date: <!-- Date for evaluation in ISO 8601 (yyyy-mm-dd) format -->
|
||||
|
||||
Description: Topic Democracy as "opinion" pool as experimental.
|
||||
- System is deployed in mainnet.
|
||||
- Users can cast opinion as vote through Status.
|
||||
- Users can delegate opinion through Status.
|
||||
- Inchain tabulation is not required.
|
||||
- Users can cast opinion as vote using SNT for Status proposals throug Topic Democracy..
|
||||
- Users can delegate opinion for Status proposals using SNT through Topic Democracy.
|
||||
- Inchain tabulation is not required, because results can be calculated offchain and as no action would be taken by the result, inchain tabulation would be waste of gas.
|
||||
- Topic Democracy don't owns SNT.
|
||||
- Users are asked to approve proposal to upgrade into DAO Governance.
|
||||
- Users are asked to approve proposal to upgrade into DAO Governance. When community decides this system is ready to take control of Status authority, a pool can be done and tabulated inchain to transfer control to Topic Democracy over a Topic Democracy proposal.
|
||||
- First DAO Governance can control network/assets by a multisig between current authority.
|
||||
|
||||
## Success Metrics
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user