Sometimes it happens that the expired signal is received while the
there's a new request in flight.
This happens in cases such as:
1) We send a request (A)
2) We get disconnected from the mailserver
3) We connect to a new mailserver
4) We send a request (B)
5) We receive an expired signal for A
In such cases the request should not be retried or counted as a failure.
Signed-off-by: Igor Mandrigin <i@mandrigin.ru>
Currently the separate topic was not used, as it's a bit tricky to
coordinate when multiple devices from different versions are present,
with the partitioned topic, probably this optimisation is not necessary
anymore, so removing this for now.
Signed-off-by: Andrea Maria Piana <andrea.maria.piana@gmail.com>
When we are offline, we don't try to change mailserver, and we don't
show a pop up to the user, as it is not that the mailserver is not
working, we are just offline.
Signed-off-by: Andrea Maria Piana <andrea.maria.piana@gmail.com>
The denormalized-clock-value was erroneously set to the one of the last
message received. This meant that on chats were the clock-value raced
ahead of the timestamp (#status), a message from the mailserver or a
message from someone with an old clock-value would basically make those
messages be sorted in the past.
The correct behavior is that last-clock-value for a given chat should be
the maximum last clock value ever seen for that chat.
Signed-off-by: Andrea Maria Piana <andrea.maria.piana@gmail.com>
We keep tokens synchronized across devices, so that the user can notify
us on any paired device.
Currently we record the installation id associated to the fcm-token even
though is not necessary, but it will be once we send device-to-device
messages, in which case we want to notify only those devices.
Signed-off-by: Andrea Maria Piana <andrea.maria.piana@gmail.com>
Currently it's very easy for contact details to get out of sync, the
simplest example is:
A & B are contacts.
A changes name.
B receives the updated name.
B re-install the app.
Until A changes name again, B will not see their name, picture and won't
be able to send push notifications.
This PR changes the behavior to publish account informations to contacts
every 24 hrs, to add some redundancy in this cases.
It also publishes a contact code every 12hrs.
Signed-off-by: Andrea Maria Piana <andrea.maria.piana@gmail.com>
Currently we use a single topic for discovery.
This provides the best obscurity at the cost of bandwidth, as a message
sent on the discovery topic will be received by any peer.
This PR changes this behavior and start listening on a partitioned
topic.
Each pk will be hashed to a limited number of topics.
Everytime someone is in a conversation with someone from another topic
they will have to listen as well to avoid loosing obscurity, because we
only forward messages that we also advertise in the bloom filter.
The choice for the number of partitions depends on 2 factors:
1) The expected number of users using the network
2) The average number of contacts each user
Any change to the discovery topic will need to be split across 3
releases, to avoid breaking compatibility:
1) Listen to the new and old topic, publish to the old topic
2) Listen to the new and old topic, publish to the new topic
3) Listen to the new topic, publish to the new topic
This is step 1.
This PR enables pairing outside of dev-mode and contact-recovery, which
is useful in the case a new device is added or re-installed.
Signed-off-by: Andrea Maria Piana <andrea.maria.piana@gmail.com>
As per announcement, we need to switch our Infura project IDs.
> As previously announced, accessing Infura will begin requiring a Project ID generated from the new Infura Dashboard. If you are using Infura and have not yet migrated your project, please take the time to do so now. The first milestone in this transition will be activated next week on January 23, 2019 at 20:00 UTC.
https://blog.infura.io/infura-dashboard-transition-update-c670945a922a
The new project is created with ID `f315575765b14720b32382a61a89341a`
and the API keys are updated.
Signed-off-by: Igor Mandrigin <i@mandrigin.ru>
When someone is sending a pfs message to us but did not include our own
device, a pop up is shown propmting the user to connect with the user.
The reason for receiving messages that are not targeting our devices are
various:
1) The account was just recovered (which means it is a new installation
id)
2) More than 3 devices are in use (we only keep max 3 devices in sync)
3) The sender has used an old bundle which does not include the current
device
Eventually we will reduce the likelihood of this scenario happening, but
we can't dismiss it completely.
It's only enabled when PFS is enabled.
Signed-off-by: Andrea Maria Piana <andrea.maria.piana@gmail.com>
This commit moves group chats to their own topic, based on the randomly
generated chat-id. It falls back on the discovery topic for those peers
who we can't fingerprint the version, for backward compatibility.
Members will now have to explicitly join a group chat to start receiving
messages from it.
Messages are still sent to users who have not joined for backward
compatibility.
Group updates are unaffected.
The bug was introduced in #7055.
`message-type` was stored and used instead of `content-type` which
caused incorrect displaying of the last message preview if the one was a
command.
This commit changes the way how keys are restored:
1. batch of `ssh.addSymKey` requests for all sym keys is sent at once
2. `:status-im.transport.core/sym-keys-added` event is dispatched with
results of all successful `ssh.addSymKey` calls
3. filter is created via `ssh.newMessageFilter`
4. `:shh.callback/filters-added` event is dispatched with all added
filters as a parameter
5. profit
In ideal case only 2 `re-frame` events are dispatched.
In order to get `:last-clock-value` one extra query was executed for
each chat during initialization.
Implementation:
- `:last-clock-value` field was added to `chat` entity
- this field is updated when the message is sent/received
- extra query was removed
The last messages of the chats are necessary to properly show the chat
list, which is shown right after signing in. Before this commit, the
last message was retrieved as one of 20 last messages fetched for each
chat.
Implementation:
- `:last-message-content` and `:last-message-type` fields were added to
`chat` entity
- both fields are updated when messages are received/sent
- loading of the last 20 messages for each chat was removed as
initialization step
This commit changes the way how/when the node is started/stopped:
1. `node` is not started on the app startup
2. When the user presses "Sign in" button the node is started
with user specific configs (`InstallationID`, custom bootnodes, etc),
and only after that `Login` call is performed.
3. When the user creates a new account, at first the node is started
with default params (the same as would be used when user signs into
the app after account creation whithout changing any setting), then
`CreateAccount` call happens, then `Login`.
4. When the user restores their account, the flow is the same as `3`
but with `RecoverAccount` instead of `CreateAccount`
5. When the user logs out the node is stopped. That's it.
We now check that we are only connected to some `peers` instead of using `NetInfo` from `react-native`.
This is because it has been reported to be quite flaky at times, not reporting online status after sleeping, and for privacy concerns (on ios it pings `apple.com`, on desktop `google.com`).
Adds a new banner `Wallet Offline` and change `Connecting to peers` to `Chat offline`.
A message will be marked as `Sent` only if it made it to the mailserver you are connected to, which will increase the guarantees that we can make about a message (if you see it as sent, it has reached at least a mailserver), this has the consequence that:
- If you are not connected to any mailserver or the mailserver is non responsive/down, and you send a message, it will be marked as `Not sent`, although it might have been actually made it in the network.
Probably this is something that we would like to communicate to the user through UX (i.e. tick if made it to at least a peer, double tick if it made to a mailserver )
Currently I have only enabled this feature in nightlies & devs, I would give it a run and see how we feel about it.
unread-messages-count fn, based off Maciej's comment on #6749
adding test, some difficulty running the test suite locally via clj
actually use the new functionality for displaying on desktop
first pass at updated styling for unread count chat icons
styling pass 2: finer attention to detail for the purple/blue icons
a bit more padding bloat to accomodate for the number 1, which occurs
frequently :)
remove counter from "home" icon on desktop
Signed-off-by: Vitaliy Vlasov <siphiuel@gmail.com>