Re-implements the component Community List according to guidelines
and, most importantly, fixes a bunch of issues and tries to achieve 100%
compatibility with Figma.
The new implementation is trying to mirror Figma properties as much as possible.
Fixes https://github.com/status-im/status-mobile/issues/16447
Changelog:
- Refactor to guidelines.
- Fix: original implementation in money/format-amounts had a bug caught by new
unit tests ("1000000" was formatted incorrectly).
- Fix: Community permission tag correct background when theme is overridden and
when blur is enabled.
- Fix: Notification dot uses correct colors for dark mode and blur variants.
- Fix: Community stats background when blur is enabled.
- Fix: Community stats icon color when blur is enabled.
- Add: The component's Quo preview screen is smarter and will only show form
fields (aka descriptors) that are relevant for each component type (engage,
discover or share).
- Add: replace hardcoded community statistics with an implementation that
actually accepts real numbers and which are correctly formatted.
- Add: New Quo descriptor type number.
- Add: Component uses correct shadows according to foundations/shadows.
It's well known that shadowing core Clojure vars can lead to unexpected bugs. In
fact, it's a common source of bugs in other languages too. In the status-mobile
repository there are, in total, 562 shadowed vars, ~500 are core vars. Excluding
the "old code" we still have 285 offenders.
In status-mobile I've already seen two bugs caused by shadowed vars, both with
the shadowed var "name". But probably other problems happened in the past, and
others will happen in the future if we don't do something about this. This PR is
also my response to my frustration trying to review PRs and checking for
shadowed vars, humans were not meant for that!
In this commit we are enabling ":shadowed-var" to lint certain (not all) core
vars as errors (not warnings). In future PRs we can gradually unshadow more
vars. For the record, name is shadowed 40 times in the new code and 130 in
total, and type is shadowed 93 times in the new code and 124 in total!
What about non-core vars, should we allow shadowing? There are ~70 non-core
shadowed vars. In my opinion, we should also lint and disallow shadowing
non-core vars, since it may cause the same kind of bugs of shadowing core vars.
But this decision can be left for another moment/issue, after we have fixed the
most prominent problem of shadowing core vars.
Which vars are unshadowed in this PR? I fixed 62 errors and unshadowed
cljs.core/iter, cljs.core/time, cljs.core/count, cljs.core/key,
clojure.core/key.
Resources:
- [clj-kondo linter: shadowed-var](https://github.com/clj-kondo/clj-kondo/blob/master/doc/linters.md#shadowed-var)
* Refactor: Remove use of f-component
* Fix documentation drawer styles
* Refactor: move title styles to style ns
* Fix StaticSafeAreaInsets not being defined on component tests
* Fix bottom sheet height on Android
This commit solves the problem described in detail in issue #15606, but in
essence, it fixes the clear icon by integrating rudimentary support for SVG
icons.
Fixes https://github.com/status-im/status-mobile/issues/15606
- Hopefully, if SVG icons prove to be a solid solution, we can easily and
progressively migrate PNG icons to SVGs, but for the moment, it was aligned
with @flexsurfer
https://github.com/status-im/status-mobile/issues/15606#issuecomment-1514631270
that we'll only use SVG icons on demand.
- Note that it's possible to import SVGs directly via js/require by installing
the library react-native-svg-transformer, but this approach is only good when
we don't want/need color customization, which is rarely the case with icons
where we want to change the foreground and/or background colors. I opted for
rendering the SVG icon as hiccup to support color customization.
- Since icons are fully memoized, the app's performance is on the same ballpark
as PNGs rendered with RN Image.
- It's possible to trim down SVGs by using a tool such as
https://github.com/svg/svgo, but this is obviously outside the scope of this
PR.
Adds support for swiping left/right on some types of notifications. Swiping left
(from left to right) shows a blue button allowing the user to mark the
notification as read/unread. Swiping right (from right to left) shows a red
button, allowing the user to delete the notification for good.
Related PR in status-go https://github.com/status-im/status-go/pull/3201.
Fixes https://github.com/status-im/status-mobile/issues/14901
Fixes https://github.com/status-im/status-mobile/issues/14900
Technical notes
===============
How's the performance? It feels near native performance in a production release
in a mid-range smartphone. So I'd say it's pretty good, but let me know if you
find any issue.
- I refrained from trying to eliminate all code duplication in this PR. Some
notifications will behave differently, especially the ones with call to
action, so I ask you to please take that in consideration when reviewing. See
https://github.com/status-im/status-mobile/issues/15118
- React Native Gesture Handler has a component named
[Swipeable](https://docs.swmansion.com/react-native-gesture-handler/docs/api/components/swipeable/).
I used it instead of writing a monstrosity 👹 of code in
Reanimated to achieve the same results.
- RN Gesture Handler touchables are the only ones that work with the Swipeable
component, so I used them and added vars to `react-native.gesture`.
- I had to manually interpolate the translation X of the buttons behind
notifications because notifications are transparent. To make interpolation
work with `Swipeable` it's mandatory to use RN `Animated.View` and not
`Reanimated.View` (see next point).
- `Swipeable` expects us to pass functions that will receive RN
`AnimatedInterpolation` instances and the rendering lifecycle does not work as
usual. Hooks didn't trigger as expected, functional Reagent components didn't
behave as expected, etc. This means `Reanimated.View` and its interpolation
function is out of question. I did try for almost two days, nothing works.
Testing notes
=============
These are some of the manual tests I ran. There are more scenarios to cover
obviously. Assuming no unread notifications before each flow:
Contact request notification
============================
From the perspective of an user A:
1. Receive a contact request from a non-mutual contact B.
2. Verify the unread count is displayed over the bell icon.
3. Verify the unread count is displayed on the `Messages > Contacts` tab, as
well as on the AC `Contact requests` tab.
4. Open the AC and before accepting/declining the contact request, check that
you CAN'T swipe left or right.
5. Accept or decline the contact request.
6. Check the unread indicator disappears in all necessary places.
7. Press on the notification and see if you're redirected to the chat.
8. Go back to the AC and swipe left to mark as `Unread`. Notice that opening the
chat marks the notification as `Read`. Also very important, notice that the
`Messages > Contacts` tab will NOT show the *pending contact requests*
section at the top. This is on purpose, given the notification is unread, but
the user has already accepted/declined the contact request, hence it's not
pending.
9. Swipe left againg to mark as `Read`. Check all unread indicators are updated.
10. Swipe right to delete the notification (it won't be displayed ever again).
Admin notification
==================
1. Generate an admin notification, e.g. a community owner receiving a request
notification to join.
2. Verify the unread count is displayed over the bell icon, as well as the AC
Admin tab.
3. Verify the community unread indicator is correctly displayed.
4. As an admin, open the AC and before accepting/declining the request, check
that you CAN'T swipe left or right.
5. Accept or decline the membership request.
6. Check the unread indicator disappears accordingly.
7. Swipe left to mark as `Read`.
8. Swipe left to mark as `Unread`.
9. Swipe right to delete the notification (it won't be displayed ever again).
Mentions & replies
==================
Similar steps outlined for `Admin` notifications, but there's one important
difference. Mention and reply notifications don't require a call to action from
the user, so the user can swipe left/right **without** first having to do
anything on the notification (such as pressing on it). See issue
https://github.com/status-im/status-mobile/issues/15118
What about other types of notifications?
========================================
Swipe gestures for other notification types will be implemented in a separate
PR.
Icaro Motta
jakubandyqrashawn
