It's well known that shadowing core Clojure vars can lead to unexpected bugs. In
fact, it's a common source of bugs in other languages too. In the status-mobile
repository there are, in total, 562 shadowed vars, ~500 are core vars. Excluding
the "old code" we still have 285 offenders.
In status-mobile I've already seen two bugs caused by shadowed vars, both with
the shadowed var "name". But probably other problems happened in the past, and
others will happen in the future if we don't do something about this. This PR is
also my response to my frustration trying to review PRs and checking for
shadowed vars, humans were not meant for that!
In this commit we are enabling ":shadowed-var" to lint certain (not all) core
vars as errors (not warnings). In future PRs we can gradually unshadow more
vars. For the record, name is shadowed 40 times in the new code and 130 in
total, and type is shadowed 93 times in the new code and 124 in total!
What about non-core vars, should we allow shadowing? There are ~70 non-core
shadowed vars. In my opinion, we should also lint and disallow shadowing
non-core vars, since it may cause the same kind of bugs of shadowing core vars.
But this decision can be left for another moment/issue, after we have fixed the
most prominent problem of shadowing core vars.
Which vars are unshadowed in this PR? I fixed 62 errors and unshadowed
cljs.core/iter, cljs.core/time, cljs.core/count, cljs.core/key,
clojure.core/key.
Resources:
- [clj-kondo linter: shadowed-var](https://github.com/clj-kondo/clj-kondo/blob/master/doc/linters.md#shadowed-var)
47711c4f...47711c4f
This commit changes the login endpoint so that it uses LoginAccount.
The main difference is that is consistent with the two others we use for
creation/importing, and this will override the networks and use the
secrets provided.
* onboarding sync devices after scan to sign in
* using subscription to get the status of pairing progress
* update following reviews
* polished code following reviews
* fixed showing unknown devices
This is the introductory work to support the new requirements for unfurling
URLs (while the message is a draft) and displaying link previews (after the
message is sent). Refer to the related status-go PR for a lot more interesting
details https://github.com/status-im/status-go/pull/3471.
Fixes https://github.com/status-im/status-mobile/issues/15469
### Notes
- The old link preview code will be removed separately, both in status-go and
status-mobile.
- I did the bulk of the work in status-go
https://github.com/status-im/status-go/pull/3471. If you want to understand
how this is all implemented, do check out the status-go PR because I heavily
documented the solution, rationale, next steps, etc.
### Performance
Does the feature perform well? Yes, there's very little overhead because
unfurling URLs happen in status-go and the event is debounced. I also payed
special attention to use a simple caching mechanism to avoid doing unnecessary
RPC requests to status-go if the URLs are cached in the client.
I have some ideas on how to improve performance further, but not in this PR
which is already screaming for reviews.
* Dont check app-state for android before routing PN
On Android devices, right after account creation and before a log out, the :app-state value in reframe db is set to background. The value becomes active after a log out and then log in which causes tapping on push notifications to do nothing.
This behaviour breaks E2E and hence in this PR, I remove the checking of this case only for Android platforms.
More work should be done to figure out why the app state event handler is behaving this way on Android but for now I would like to unblock E2E.
* e2e: remove xfailed tests
---------
Co-authored-by: Churikova Tetiana <tatiana@status.im>
* use debounce-and-dispatch to improve mention performance
* increase time to 400ms
* decrease time to 300ms
* update status-go-version.json
* update status-go-version.json
