2019-09-07 12:57:22 +00:00
|
|
|
;; shadow-cljs configuration
|
2023-02-17 12:10:00 +00:00
|
|
|
{:source-paths ["src" "test/cljs"]
|
2019-09-07 12:57:22 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2023-05-31 11:35:31 +00:00
|
|
|
:dependencies [[reagent "1.2.0"]
|
2023-05-31 09:08:34 +00:00
|
|
|
[re-frame "1.3.0"]
|
Upgrade shadow-cljs and ClojureScript (#15417)
This commit upgrades Shadow CLJS from 2.11.16 (released on Feb/21) to latest
2.25.0 (Jul/23), so ~1.5 years worth of upgrades. By upgrading shadow we
can finally use the latest major Clojure version 1.11.x.
Why upgrade shadow?
- Shadow CLJS controls the ClojureScript version we can use. In order to use the
latest major Clojure version we must upgrade Shadow CLJS.
- Shadow CLJS releases new versions very frequently, and if you take a look at
its changelog https://github.com/thheller/shadow-cljs/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md, you'll see
it had tons and tons of bug fixes over the years. I hope some of them help
improve the DX for certain contributors who recently reported issues with
it.
- Clojure 1.11 brings new features, bug fixes and even performance improvements
(although I think the performance mostly impacts Clojure on the JVM). See the
changelog https://github.com/clojure/clojure/blob/master/changes.md#changes-to-clojure-in-version-1110
Things that can be beneficial to us, or are interesting nonetheless:
- New :as-alias to be used in require, which is like :as but does not require
the namespace to load. This means namespaced keywords using :as-alias can't
cause circular dependency errors. This feature would very useful if we used
namespaced keywords, but we don't, so...
https://github.com/clojure/clojure/blob/master/changes.md#22-as-alias-in-require
- New macros run-test and run-test-var to run single test with fixtures and
report.
- New iteration function, useful for processing paginated data.
https://www.abhinavomprakash.com/posts/clojure-iteration/
- New update-keys function: applies a function to every key in a map.
- New update-vals function: applies a function to every value in a map.
Examples for update-vals and update-keys. They should perform better than the
common reduce-kv approach since they use a transient data structure.
(let [m {:a 1 :b 2}]
(update-vals m inc)) ; => {:a 2, :b 3}
(let [m {:a 1 :b 2}]
(update-keys m name)) ; => {"a" 1, "b" 2}
Why change namespaces within __tests__ directories?
Any namespace with the word --tests-- throws an error, like the one below. I
didn't bother investigating why, so I changed the guidelines to reflect the new
convention. It's probably related to the double dashes in the name.
Namespace quo2.components.dividers.--tests--.divider-label-component-spec has a
segment starting with an invalid JavaScript identifier at line 1
2023-07-28 16:40:54 +00:00
|
|
|
[binaryage/oops "0.7.2"]
|
2023-02-17 12:10:00 +00:00
|
|
|
[com.andrewmcveigh/cljs-time "0.5.2"]
|
2023-10-20 23:47:23 +00:00
|
|
|
[com.taoensso/timbre "6.3.1"]
|
|
|
|
|
[cljs-bean "1.9.0"]
|
|
|
|
|
[com.cognitect/transit-cljs "0.8.280"]
|
2023-02-17 12:10:00 +00:00
|
|
|
[camel-snake-kebab "0.4.3"]
|
Introduce malli library (#17867)
This commit is the foundational step to start using malli
(https://github.com/metosin/malli) in this project.
Take in consideration we will only be able to realize malli's full power in
future iterations.
For those without context: the mobile team watched a presentation about malli
and went through a light RFC to put everyone on the same page, among other
discussions here and there in PRs.
To keep things relatively short:
1. Unit, integration and component tests will short-circuit (fail) when
inputs/outputs don't conform to their respective function schemas (CI should
fail too).
2. Failed schema checks will not block the app from initializing, nor throw an
exception that would trigger the LogBox. Exceptions are only thrown in the
scope of automated tests.
3. There's zero performance impact in production code because we only
instrument. Instrumentation is removed from the compiled code due to the
usage of "^boolean js.goog/DEBUG".
4. We shouldn't expect any meaningful slowdown during development.
**What are we instrumenting in this PR?**
Per our team's agreement, we're only instrumenting the bare minimum to showcase 2 examples.
- Instrument a utility function utils.money/format-amount using the macro
approach.
- Instrument a quo component quo.components.counter.step.view/view using the
functional approach.
Both approaches are useful, the functional approach is powerful and allow us to
instrument anonymous functions, like the ones we pass to subscriptions or event
handlers, or the higher-order function quo.theme/with-theme. The macro approach
is perfect for functions already defined with defn.
**I evaluated the schema or function in the REPL but nothing changes**
- If you evaluate the source function, you need to evaluate schema/=> or
schema/instrument as well.
- Remember to *var quote* when using schema/instrument.
- You must call "(status-im2.setup.schema/setup!)" after any var is
re-instrumented. It's advisable to add a keybinding in your editor to send
this expression automatically to the CLJS REPL, or add the call at the end of
the namespace you are working on (similar to how some devs add "(run-tests)"
at the end of test namespaces).
**Where should schemas be defined?**
For the moment, we should focus on instrumenting quo components, so define each
function schema in the same namespace as the component's public "view" var.
To be specific:
- A schema used only to instrument a single function and not used elsewhere,
like a quo component schema, wouldn't benefit from being defined in a separate
namespace because that would force the developer to constantly open two files
instead of one to check function signatures.
- A common schema reused across the repo, like ":schema.common/theme" should be
registered in the global registry "schema.registry" so that consumers can just
refer to it by keyword, as if it was a built-in malli schema.
- A common schema describing status-go entities like message, notification,
community, etc can be stored either in the respective
"src/status_im2/contexts/*" or registered globally, or even somewhere else.
This is yet to be defined, but since I chose not to include schemas for them,
we can postpone this guideline.
2023-11-18 14:04:48 +00:00
|
|
|
[metosin/malli "0.13.0"]
|
2023-10-11 21:53:34 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Upgrade shadow-cljs and ClojureScript (#15417)
This commit upgrades Shadow CLJS from 2.11.16 (released on Feb/21) to latest
2.25.0 (Jul/23), so ~1.5 years worth of upgrades. By upgrading shadow we
can finally use the latest major Clojure version 1.11.x.
Why upgrade shadow?
- Shadow CLJS controls the ClojureScript version we can use. In order to use the
latest major Clojure version we must upgrade Shadow CLJS.
- Shadow CLJS releases new versions very frequently, and if you take a look at
its changelog https://github.com/thheller/shadow-cljs/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md, you'll see
it had tons and tons of bug fixes over the years. I hope some of them help
improve the DX for certain contributors who recently reported issues with
it.
- Clojure 1.11 brings new features, bug fixes and even performance improvements
(although I think the performance mostly impacts Clojure on the JVM). See the
changelog https://github.com/clojure/clojure/blob/master/changes.md#changes-to-clojure-in-version-1110
Things that can be beneficial to us, or are interesting nonetheless:
- New :as-alias to be used in require, which is like :as but does not require
the namespace to load. This means namespaced keywords using :as-alias can't
cause circular dependency errors. This feature would very useful if we used
namespaced keywords, but we don't, so...
https://github.com/clojure/clojure/blob/master/changes.md#22-as-alias-in-require
- New macros run-test and run-test-var to run single test with fixtures and
report.
- New iteration function, useful for processing paginated data.
https://www.abhinavomprakash.com/posts/clojure-iteration/
- New update-keys function: applies a function to every key in a map.
- New update-vals function: applies a function to every value in a map.
Examples for update-vals and update-keys. They should perform better than the
common reduce-kv approach since they use a transient data structure.
(let [m {:a 1 :b 2}]
(update-vals m inc)) ; => {:a 2, :b 3}
(let [m {:a 1 :b 2}]
(update-keys m name)) ; => {"a" 1, "b" 2}
Why change namespaces within __tests__ directories?
Any namespace with the word --tests-- throws an error, like the one below. I
didn't bother investigating why, so I changed the guidelines to reflect the new
convention. It's probably related to the double dashes in the name.
Namespace quo2.components.dividers.--tests--.divider-label-component-spec has a
segment starting with an invalid JavaScript identifier at line 1
2023-07-28 16:40:54 +00:00
|
|
|
;; Dev dependencies
|
2023-12-04 13:49:51 +00:00
|
|
|
[refactor-nrepl "3.9.1"]
|
|
|
|
|
[cider/cider-nrepl "0.31.0"]
|
2023-02-17 12:10:00 +00:00
|
|
|
[cider/piggieback "0.4.1"]
|
2023-12-04 13:49:51 +00:00
|
|
|
[org.slf4j/slf4j-nop "2.0.9"]
|
2023-02-17 12:10:00 +00:00
|
|
|
[re-frisk-remote "1.6.0"]
|
2023-12-05 20:20:54 +00:00
|
|
|
[nubank/matcher-combinators "3.8.8"]
|
2023-10-11 21:53:34 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
;; Use the same version specified in the Nix dependency.
|
|
|
|
|
[clj-kondo/clj-kondo "2023.09.07"]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Upgrade shadow-cljs and ClojureScript (#15417)
This commit upgrades Shadow CLJS from 2.11.16 (released on Feb/21) to latest
2.25.0 (Jul/23), so ~1.5 years worth of upgrades. By upgrading shadow we
can finally use the latest major Clojure version 1.11.x.
Why upgrade shadow?
- Shadow CLJS controls the ClojureScript version we can use. In order to use the
latest major Clojure version we must upgrade Shadow CLJS.
- Shadow CLJS releases new versions very frequently, and if you take a look at
its changelog https://github.com/thheller/shadow-cljs/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md, you'll see
it had tons and tons of bug fixes over the years. I hope some of them help
improve the DX for certain contributors who recently reported issues with
it.
- Clojure 1.11 brings new features, bug fixes and even performance improvements
(although I think the performance mostly impacts Clojure on the JVM). See the
changelog https://github.com/clojure/clojure/blob/master/changes.md#changes-to-clojure-in-version-1110
Things that can be beneficial to us, or are interesting nonetheless:
- New :as-alias to be used in require, which is like :as but does not require
the namespace to load. This means namespaced keywords using :as-alias can't
cause circular dependency errors. This feature would very useful if we used
namespaced keywords, but we don't, so...
https://github.com/clojure/clojure/blob/master/changes.md#22-as-alias-in-require
- New macros run-test and run-test-var to run single test with fixtures and
report.
- New iteration function, useful for processing paginated data.
https://www.abhinavomprakash.com/posts/clojure-iteration/
- New update-keys function: applies a function to every key in a map.
- New update-vals function: applies a function to every value in a map.
Examples for update-vals and update-keys. They should perform better than the
common reduce-kv approach since they use a transient data structure.
(let [m {:a 1 :b 2}]
(update-vals m inc)) ; => {:a 2, :b 3}
(let [m {:a 1 :b 2}]
(update-keys m name)) ; => {"a" 1, "b" 2}
Why change namespaces within __tests__ directories?
Any namespace with the word --tests-- throws an error, like the one below. I
didn't bother investigating why, so I changed the guidelines to reflect the new
convention. It's probably related to the double dashes in the name.
Namespace quo2.components.dividers.--tests--.divider-label-component-spec has a
segment starting with an invalid JavaScript identifier at line 1
2023-07-28 16:40:54 +00:00
|
|
|
;; Routing
|
2023-02-17 12:10:00 +00:00
|
|
|
[bidi "2.1.6"]
|
Upgrade shadow-cljs and ClojureScript (#15417)
This commit upgrades Shadow CLJS from 2.11.16 (released on Feb/21) to latest
2.25.0 (Jul/23), so ~1.5 years worth of upgrades. By upgrading shadow we
can finally use the latest major Clojure version 1.11.x.
Why upgrade shadow?
- Shadow CLJS controls the ClojureScript version we can use. In order to use the
latest major Clojure version we must upgrade Shadow CLJS.
- Shadow CLJS releases new versions very frequently, and if you take a look at
its changelog https://github.com/thheller/shadow-cljs/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md, you'll see
it had tons and tons of bug fixes over the years. I hope some of them help
improve the DX for certain contributors who recently reported issues with
it.
- Clojure 1.11 brings new features, bug fixes and even performance improvements
(although I think the performance mostly impacts Clojure on the JVM). See the
changelog https://github.com/clojure/clojure/blob/master/changes.md#changes-to-clojure-in-version-1110
Things that can be beneficial to us, or are interesting nonetheless:
- New :as-alias to be used in require, which is like :as but does not require
the namespace to load. This means namespaced keywords using :as-alias can't
cause circular dependency errors. This feature would very useful if we used
namespaced keywords, but we don't, so...
https://github.com/clojure/clojure/blob/master/changes.md#22-as-alias-in-require
- New macros run-test and run-test-var to run single test with fixtures and
report.
- New iteration function, useful for processing paginated data.
https://www.abhinavomprakash.com/posts/clojure-iteration/
- New update-keys function: applies a function to every key in a map.
- New update-vals function: applies a function to every value in a map.
Examples for update-vals and update-keys. They should perform better than the
common reduce-kv approach since they use a transient data structure.
(let [m {:a 1 :b 2}]
(update-vals m inc)) ; => {:a 2, :b 3}
(let [m {:a 1 :b 2}]
(update-keys m name)) ; => {"a" 1, "b" 2}
Why change namespaces within __tests__ directories?
Any namespace with the word --tests-- throws an error, like the one below. I
didn't bother investigating why, so I changed the guidelines to reflect the new
convention. It's probably related to the double dashes in the name.
Namespace quo2.components.dividers.--tests--.divider-label-component-spec has a
segment starting with an invalid JavaScript identifier at line 1
2023-07-28 16:40:54 +00:00
|
|
|
;; Test dependencies
|
2023-02-17 12:10:00 +00:00
|
|
|
[day8.re-frame/test "0.1.5"]
|
2023-10-20 23:47:23 +00:00
|
|
|
[com.taoensso/tufte "2.6.3"]]
|
2019-09-07 12:57:22 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
;; port and middleware for repl in development
|
2023-02-17 12:10:00 +00:00
|
|
|
:nrepl {:port 7888
|
|
|
|
|
:middleware [cider.piggieback/wrap-cljs-repl
|
|
|
|
|
refactor-nrepl.middleware/wrap-refactor]}
|
2019-09-07 12:57:22 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
;; shadow-cljs web interface
|
2023-02-17 12:10:00 +00:00
|
|
|
:http {:port 3449
|
|
|
|
|
:host "0.0.0.0"}
|
2019-09-07 12:57:22 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2023-12-19 17:41:30 +00:00
|
|
|
:cache-blockers #{legacy.status-im.utils.js-resources legacy.status-im.ui.components.icons.icons}
|
2020-05-05 05:43:55 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2022-12-20 13:57:49 +00:00
|
|
|
:builds
|
|
|
|
|
{:mobile
|
2023-02-17 12:10:00 +00:00
|
|
|
{:target :react-native
|
2023-05-16 16:42:56 +00:00
|
|
|
;; To match the folder created by Nix build of JSBundle.
|
|
|
|
|
:output-dir "result"
|
2023-12-19 19:59:07 +00:00
|
|
|
:init-fn status-im.core/init
|
2022-12-20 13:57:49 +00:00
|
|
|
;; When false, the Shadow-CLJS watcher won't automatically refresh
|
|
|
|
|
;; the target files (a.k.a hot reload). When false, you can manually
|
|
|
|
|
;; reload by calling `shadow.cljs.devtools.api/watch-compile-all!`.
|
2023-02-17 12:10:00 +00:00
|
|
|
:devtools {:autobuild #shadow/env ["SHADOW_AUTOBUILD_ENABLED" :default true :as :bool]}
|
2023-12-19 19:59:07 +00:00
|
|
|
:dev {:devtools {:before-load-async status-im.setup.hot-reload/before-reload
|
|
|
|
|
:after-load-async status-im.setup.hot-reload/reload
|
|
|
|
|
:build-notify status-im.setup.hot-reload/build-notify
|
2023-06-22 11:25:09 +00:00
|
|
|
:preloads [re-frisk-remote.preload
|
2023-12-19 19:59:07 +00:00
|
|
|
status-im.setup.schema-preload
|
Upgrade shadow-cljs and ClojureScript (#15417)
This commit upgrades Shadow CLJS from 2.11.16 (released on Feb/21) to latest
2.25.0 (Jul/23), so ~1.5 years worth of upgrades. By upgrading shadow we
can finally use the latest major Clojure version 1.11.x.
Why upgrade shadow?
- Shadow CLJS controls the ClojureScript version we can use. In order to use the
latest major Clojure version we must upgrade Shadow CLJS.
- Shadow CLJS releases new versions very frequently, and if you take a look at
its changelog https://github.com/thheller/shadow-cljs/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md, you'll see
it had tons and tons of bug fixes over the years. I hope some of them help
improve the DX for certain contributors who recently reported issues with
it.
- Clojure 1.11 brings new features, bug fixes and even performance improvements
(although I think the performance mostly impacts Clojure on the JVM). See the
changelog https://github.com/clojure/clojure/blob/master/changes.md#changes-to-clojure-in-version-1110
Things that can be beneficial to us, or are interesting nonetheless:
- New :as-alias to be used in require, which is like :as but does not require
the namespace to load. This means namespaced keywords using :as-alias can't
cause circular dependency errors. This feature would very useful if we used
namespaced keywords, but we don't, so...
https://github.com/clojure/clojure/blob/master/changes.md#22-as-alias-in-require
- New macros run-test and run-test-var to run single test with fixtures and
report.
- New iteration function, useful for processing paginated data.
https://www.abhinavomprakash.com/posts/clojure-iteration/
- New update-keys function: applies a function to every key in a map.
- New update-vals function: applies a function to every value in a map.
Examples for update-vals and update-keys. They should perform better than the
common reduce-kv approach since they use a transient data structure.
(let [m {:a 1 :b 2}]
(update-vals m inc)) ; => {:a 2, :b 3}
(let [m {:a 1 :b 2}]
(update-keys m name)) ; => {"a" 1, "b" 2}
Why change namespaces within __tests__ directories?
Any namespace with the word --tests-- throws an error, like the one below. I
didn't bother investigating why, so I changed the guidelines to reflect the new
convention. It's probably related to the double dashes in the name.
Namespace quo2.components.dividers.--tests--.divider-label-component-spec has a
segment starting with an invalid JavaScript identifier at line 1
2023-07-28 16:40:54 +00:00
|
|
|
;; In order to use component test helpers in the REPL we
|
|
|
|
|
;; need to preload namespaces that are not normally required
|
|
|
|
|
;; by production code, such as
|
2023-06-22 11:25:09 +00:00
|
|
|
;; @testing-library/react-native.
|
|
|
|
|
test-helpers.component]}
|
2023-02-17 12:10:00 +00:00
|
|
|
:closure-defines
|
2023-12-19 19:59:07 +00:00
|
|
|
{status-im.config/POKT_TOKEN #shadow/env "POKT_TOKEN"
|
|
|
|
|
status-im.config/INFURA_TOKEN #shadow/env "INFURA_TOKEN"
|
|
|
|
|
status-im.config/OPENSEA_API_KEY #shadow/env "OPENSEA_API_KEY"
|
|
|
|
|
status-im.config/ALCHEMY_ARBITRUM_GOERLI_TOKEN #shadow/env "ALCHEMY_ARBITRUM_GOERLI_TOKEN"
|
|
|
|
|
status-im.config/ALCHEMY_OPTIMISM_GOERLI_TOKEN #shadow/env "ALCHEMY_OPTIMISM_GOERLI_TOKEN"
|
|
|
|
|
status-im.config/ALCHEMY_OPTIMISM_MAINNET_TOKEN #shadow/env "ALCHEMY_OPTIMISM_MAINNET_TOKEN"
|
|
|
|
|
status-im.config/ALCHEMY_ARBITRUM_MAINNET_TOKEN #shadow/env "ALCHEMY_ARBITRUM_MAINNET_TOKEN"}
|
2023-02-17 12:10:00 +00:00
|
|
|
:compiler-options {:output-feature-set :es5
|
2023-09-06 11:58:42 +00:00
|
|
|
;; We disable `:fn-deprecated` warnings because we
|
|
|
|
|
;; are managing deprecation via clj-kondo and we
|
|
|
|
|
;; don't want the terminal output to be littered
|
|
|
|
|
;; with warnings on every code reload.
|
|
|
|
|
:warnings {:fn-deprecated false}
|
|
|
|
|
:closure-defines {re-frame.trace/trace-enabled? true}
|
|
|
|
|
:source-map false
|
Introduce malli library (#17867)
This commit is the foundational step to start using malli
(https://github.com/metosin/malli) in this project.
Take in consideration we will only be able to realize malli's full power in
future iterations.
For those without context: the mobile team watched a presentation about malli
and went through a light RFC to put everyone on the same page, among other
discussions here and there in PRs.
To keep things relatively short:
1. Unit, integration and component tests will short-circuit (fail) when
inputs/outputs don't conform to their respective function schemas (CI should
fail too).
2. Failed schema checks will not block the app from initializing, nor throw an
exception that would trigger the LogBox. Exceptions are only thrown in the
scope of automated tests.
3. There's zero performance impact in production code because we only
instrument. Instrumentation is removed from the compiled code due to the
usage of "^boolean js.goog/DEBUG".
4. We shouldn't expect any meaningful slowdown during development.
**What are we instrumenting in this PR?**
Per our team's agreement, we're only instrumenting the bare minimum to showcase 2 examples.
- Instrument a utility function utils.money/format-amount using the macro
approach.
- Instrument a quo component quo.components.counter.step.view/view using the
functional approach.
Both approaches are useful, the functional approach is powerful and allow us to
instrument anonymous functions, like the ones we pass to subscriptions or event
handlers, or the higher-order function quo.theme/with-theme. The macro approach
is perfect for functions already defined with defn.
**I evaluated the schema or function in the REPL but nothing changes**
- If you evaluate the source function, you need to evaluate schema/=> or
schema/instrument as well.
- Remember to *var quote* when using schema/instrument.
- You must call "(status-im2.setup.schema/setup!)" after any var is
re-instrumented. It's advisable to add a keybinding in your editor to send
this expression automatically to the CLJS REPL, or add the call at the end of
the namespace you are working on (similar to how some devs add "(run-tests)"
at the end of test namespaces).
**Where should schemas be defined?**
For the moment, we should focus on instrumenting quo components, so define each
function schema in the same namespace as the component's public "view" var.
To be specific:
- A schema used only to instrument a single function and not used elsewhere,
like a quo component schema, wouldn't benefit from being defined in a separate
namespace because that would force the developer to constantly open two files
instead of one to check function signatures.
- A common schema reused across the repo, like ":schema.common/theme" should be
registered in the global registry "schema.registry" so that consumers can just
refer to it by keyword, as if it was a built-in malli schema.
- A common schema describing status-go entities like message, notification,
community, etc can be stored either in the respective
"src/status_im2/contexts/*" or registered globally, or even somewhere else.
This is yet to be defined, but since I chose not to include schemas for them,
we can postpone this guideline.
2023-11-18 14:04:48 +00:00
|
|
|
;; This seems to be necessary while using the REPL,
|
|
|
|
|
;; otherwise sometimes you'll get weird errors when
|
|
|
|
|
;; instrumenting functions.
|
|
|
|
|
:static-fns false
|
2023-09-06 11:58:42 +00:00
|
|
|
:infer-externs true}
|
2023-02-17 12:10:00 +00:00
|
|
|
;; if you want to use a real device, set your local ip
|
|
|
|
|
;; in the SHADOW_HOST env variable to make sure that
|
|
|
|
|
;; it will use the right interface
|
|
|
|
|
:local-ip #shadow/env "SHADOW_HOST"}
|
2023-12-19 17:41:30 +00:00
|
|
|
:chunks {:fleets legacy.status-im.fleet.default-fleet/default-fleets}
|
2022-12-20 13:57:49 +00:00
|
|
|
:release
|
|
|
|
|
{:closure-defines
|
2023-12-19 19:59:07 +00:00
|
|
|
{status-im.config/POKT_TOKEN #shadow/env "POKT_TOKEN"
|
|
|
|
|
status-im.config/INFURA_TOKEN #shadow/env "INFURA_TOKEN"
|
|
|
|
|
status-im.config/OPENSEA_API_KEY #shadow/env "OPENSEA_API_KEY"
|
|
|
|
|
status-im.config/ALCHEMY_ARBITRUM_GOERLI_TOKEN #shadow/env "ALCHEMY_ARBITRUM_GOERLI_TOKEN"
|
|
|
|
|
status-im.config/ALCHEMY_OPTIMISM_GOERLI_TOKEN #shadow/env "ALCHEMY_OPTIMISM_GOERLI_TOKEN"
|
|
|
|
|
status-im.config/ALCHEMY_OPTIMISM_MAINNET_TOKEN #shadow/env "ALCHEMY_OPTIMISM_MAINNET_TOKEN"
|
|
|
|
|
status-im.config/ALCHEMY_ARBITRUM_MAINNET_TOKEN #shadow/env "ALCHEMY_ARBITRUM_MAINNET_TOKEN"}
|
2022-12-20 13:57:49 +00:00
|
|
|
:compiler-options {:output-feature-set :es6
|
|
|
|
|
;;disable for android build as there
|
|
|
|
|
;;is an intermittent warning with deftype
|
|
|
|
|
:warnings-as-errors false
|
|
|
|
|
:infer-externs :auto
|
|
|
|
|
:static-fns true
|
|
|
|
|
:fn-invoke-direct true
|
|
|
|
|
:optimizations :advanced
|
|
|
|
|
:js-options {:js-provider :closure}}}}
|
|
|
|
|
;; the tests are ran with node, react-native dependencies are mocked
|
|
|
|
|
;; by using node --require override.js, which uses the node-library
|
|
|
|
|
;; produced by the target :mocks below and redefines node require
|
|
|
|
|
;; function to use the mocks instead of the rn libraries
|
|
|
|
|
:test
|
2023-02-17 12:10:00 +00:00
|
|
|
{:output-to "target/test/test.js"
|
|
|
|
|
:output-dir "target/test"
|
|
|
|
|
:optimizations :simple
|
|
|
|
|
:target :node-test
|
2023-12-19 19:59:07 +00:00
|
|
|
:dev {:devtools {:preloads [status-im.setup.schema-preload]}}
|
Upgrade shadow-cljs and ClojureScript (#15417)
This commit upgrades Shadow CLJS from 2.11.16 (released on Feb/21) to latest
2.25.0 (Jul/23), so ~1.5 years worth of upgrades. By upgrading shadow we
can finally use the latest major Clojure version 1.11.x.
Why upgrade shadow?
- Shadow CLJS controls the ClojureScript version we can use. In order to use the
latest major Clojure version we must upgrade Shadow CLJS.
- Shadow CLJS releases new versions very frequently, and if you take a look at
its changelog https://github.com/thheller/shadow-cljs/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md, you'll see
it had tons and tons of bug fixes over the years. I hope some of them help
improve the DX for certain contributors who recently reported issues with
it.
- Clojure 1.11 brings new features, bug fixes and even performance improvements
(although I think the performance mostly impacts Clojure on the JVM). See the
changelog https://github.com/clojure/clojure/blob/master/changes.md#changes-to-clojure-in-version-1110
Things that can be beneficial to us, or are interesting nonetheless:
- New :as-alias to be used in require, which is like :as but does not require
the namespace to load. This means namespaced keywords using :as-alias can't
cause circular dependency errors. This feature would very useful if we used
namespaced keywords, but we don't, so...
https://github.com/clojure/clojure/blob/master/changes.md#22-as-alias-in-require
- New macros run-test and run-test-var to run single test with fixtures and
report.
- New iteration function, useful for processing paginated data.
https://www.abhinavomprakash.com/posts/clojure-iteration/
- New update-keys function: applies a function to every key in a map.
- New update-vals function: applies a function to every value in a map.
Examples for update-vals and update-keys. They should perform better than the
common reduce-kv approach since they use a transient data structure.
(let [m {:a 1 :b 2}]
(update-vals m inc)) ; => {:a 2, :b 3}
(let [m {:a 1 :b 2}]
(update-keys m name)) ; => {"a" 1, "b" 2}
Why change namespaces within __tests__ directories?
Any namespace with the word --tests-- throws an error, like the one below. I
didn't bother investigating why, so I changed the guidelines to reflect the new
convention. It's probably related to the double dashes in the name.
Namespace quo2.components.dividers.--tests--.divider-label-component-spec has a
segment starting with an invalid JavaScript identifier at line 1
2023-07-28 16:40:54 +00:00
|
|
|
;; Uncomment line below to `make test-watch` a specific file
|
2023-12-19 19:59:07 +00:00
|
|
|
;; :ns-regexp "status-im.subs.messages-test$"
|
2023-12-19 17:41:30 +00:00
|
|
|
:main legacy.status-im.test-runner/main
|
2022-12-20 13:57:49 +00:00
|
|
|
;; set :ui-driven to true to let shadow-cljs inject node-repl
|
2023-11-02 07:31:49 +00:00
|
|
|
:ui-driven true
|
2022-12-20 13:57:49 +00:00
|
|
|
:closure-defines
|
2023-12-19 19:59:07 +00:00
|
|
|
{schema.core/throw-on-error? true
|
|
|
|
|
status-im.config/POKT_TOKEN #shadow/env "POKT_TOKEN"
|
|
|
|
|
status-im.config/INFURA_TOKEN #shadow/env "INFURA_TOKEN"
|
|
|
|
|
status-im.config/OPENSEA_API_KEY #shadow/env "OPENSEA_API_KEY"
|
|
|
|
|
status-im.config/ALCHEMY_ARBITRUM_GOERLI_TOKEN #shadow/env "ALCHEMY_ARBITRUM_GOERLI_TOKEN"
|
|
|
|
|
status-im.config/ALCHEMY_OPTIMISM_GOERLI_TOKEN #shadow/env "ALCHEMY_OPTIMISM_GOERLI_TOKEN"
|
|
|
|
|
status-im.config/ALCHEMY_OPTIMISM_MAINNET_TOKEN #shadow/env "ALCHEMY_OPTIMISM_MAINNET_TOKEN"
|
|
|
|
|
status-im.config/ALCHEMY_ARBITRUM_MAINNET_TOKEN #shadow/env "ALCHEMY_ARBITRUM_MAINNET_TOKEN"}
|
2022-12-20 13:57:49 +00:00
|
|
|
:compiler-options
|
|
|
|
|
{;; needed because we override require and it
|
|
|
|
|
;; messes with source-map which reports callstack
|
|
|
|
|
;; exceeded exceptions instead of real issues
|
|
|
|
|
:source-map false
|
|
|
|
|
;; needed because we use deref in tests
|
|
|
|
|
:static-fns false
|
|
|
|
|
:optimizations :simple
|
2023-10-04 19:06:54 +00:00
|
|
|
:warnings {:fn-deprecated false}
|
2022-12-20 13:57:49 +00:00
|
|
|
:infer-externs true}}
|
2019-09-07 12:57:22 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2022-12-20 13:57:49 +00:00
|
|
|
;; mock.js-dependencies is mocking the react-native libraries
|
|
|
|
|
;; we build it as a node library so that it can be required by
|
|
|
|
|
;; override.js
|
|
|
|
|
:mocks
|
|
|
|
|
{:target :node-library
|
|
|
|
|
:exports {:mocks mocks.js-dependencies/mock}
|
|
|
|
|
:output-to "target/mocks/mocks.js"
|
|
|
|
|
:output-dir "target/mocks"
|
|
|
|
|
:compiler-options {:optimizations :simple
|
|
|
|
|
:source-map false}}
|
|
|
|
|
:component-test {:target :npm-module
|
Introduce malli library (#17867)
This commit is the foundational step to start using malli
(https://github.com/metosin/malli) in this project.
Take in consideration we will only be able to realize malli's full power in
future iterations.
For those without context: the mobile team watched a presentation about malli
and went through a light RFC to put everyone on the same page, among other
discussions here and there in PRs.
To keep things relatively short:
1. Unit, integration and component tests will short-circuit (fail) when
inputs/outputs don't conform to their respective function schemas (CI should
fail too).
2. Failed schema checks will not block the app from initializing, nor throw an
exception that would trigger the LogBox. Exceptions are only thrown in the
scope of automated tests.
3. There's zero performance impact in production code because we only
instrument. Instrumentation is removed from the compiled code due to the
usage of "^boolean js.goog/DEBUG".
4. We shouldn't expect any meaningful slowdown during development.
**What are we instrumenting in this PR?**
Per our team's agreement, we're only instrumenting the bare minimum to showcase 2 examples.
- Instrument a utility function utils.money/format-amount using the macro
approach.
- Instrument a quo component quo.components.counter.step.view/view using the
functional approach.
Both approaches are useful, the functional approach is powerful and allow us to
instrument anonymous functions, like the ones we pass to subscriptions or event
handlers, or the higher-order function quo.theme/with-theme. The macro approach
is perfect for functions already defined with defn.
**I evaluated the schema or function in the REPL but nothing changes**
- If you evaluate the source function, you need to evaluate schema/=> or
schema/instrument as well.
- Remember to *var quote* when using schema/instrument.
- You must call "(status-im2.setup.schema/setup!)" after any var is
re-instrumented. It's advisable to add a keybinding in your editor to send
this expression automatically to the CLJS REPL, or add the call at the end of
the namespace you are working on (similar to how some devs add "(run-tests)"
at the end of test namespaces).
**Where should schemas be defined?**
For the moment, we should focus on instrumenting quo components, so define each
function schema in the same namespace as the component's public "view" var.
To be specific:
- A schema used only to instrument a single function and not used elsewhere,
like a quo component schema, wouldn't benefit from being defined in a separate
namespace because that would force the developer to constantly open two files
instead of one to check function signatures.
- A common schema reused across the repo, like ":schema.common/theme" should be
registered in the global registry "schema.registry" so that consumers can just
refer to it by keyword, as if it was a built-in malli schema.
- A common schema describing status-go entities like message, notification,
community, etc can be stored either in the respective
"src/status_im2/contexts/*" or registered globally, or even somewhere else.
This is yet to be defined, but since I chose not to include schemas for them,
we can postpone this guideline.
2023-11-18 14:04:48 +00:00
|
|
|
:entries [;; We need to tell shadow-cljs to compile
|
Fix component tests, upgrade Jest & friends, and a few other goodies (#18276)
Fix all component tests after the latest RN upgrade.
Fixes https://github.com/status-im/status-mobile/issues/18157
Closes https://github.com/status-im/status-mobile/pull/18235
Dependency changes
- Upgraded Jest: from 26.6.3 to latest 29.7.0.
- Upgraded @testing-library/jest-native: from 5.3.0 to latest 5.4.3
- Upgraded @testing-library/react-native: from 11.5.4 to 12.4.2
- Removed explicit dependency on jest-circus, this is now the default test
runner.
- Removed explicit dependency on jest-environment-node. This is handled by the
package manager.
- Added jest-silent-reporter at version 0.5.0.
### Why component tests were failing?
Many tests were failing because we were using RN Testing Library (RNTL) in an
unreliable fashion. With the recent library upgrades, the unreliability was
excerbated. Other times, the tests were incorrectly arranging data.
### with-redefs does not work with async code
Generally speaking, with-redefs should not be used with async code, assume the
worst. The scope of the macro will cease to exist by the time the async code
runs. In many tests we were using with-redefs, then calling render, but for some
components that use use-effect, JS timers, animations, etc it's unreliable and
were the reason for failures.
It's easy to reproduce too:
```clojure
(defn foo []
:foo)
(foo)
;; => :foo
(with-redefs [foo (constantly :bar)]
(foo))
;; => :bar
(js/setTimeout
(fn []
(tap> [:calling-foo (foo)]))
100)
;; Taps [:calling-foo :foo]
;; As you would expect, when running without with-redefs, it prints :foo.
;; So far so good, but whatch what happens with async code:
(with-redefs [foo (constantly :bar)]
(js/setTimeout
(fn []
(tap> [:calling-foo (foo)]))
100))
;; Taps [:calling-foo :foo]
;; ====> PROBLEM: Taps :foo, not :bar as one might expect
```
### Not waiting on wait-for
When test-helpers.component/wait-for is used, subsequent assertions/etc should
be done after the promise returned by wait-for is resolved. But remember to not
perform side-effects inside the wait-for callback (check out the docs
https://callstack.github.io/react-native-testing-library/docs/api#waitfor).
Most, if not all of our usages of wait-for were not waiting.
#### Improvement 1 - Silence Jest on demand
If you need to re-run component tests frequently, you may want to reduce the
output verbosity. By passing JEST_USE_SILENT_REPORTER=true to make
component-test or make component-test-watch you will see a lot less noise and be
able to focus on what really matters to you.
#### Improvement 2 - Selectively focus/disable tests
Because of our need to first compile CLJS to JS before running tests via Jest,
we couldn't easily skip or focus on specific tests. From this commit onwards, we
should never again have to change the list of requires in files core_spec.cljs.
Commenting out required namespaces gives a bad DX because it causes constant
rebasing issues.
#### Improvement 3 - Translations now work as in prod code (but only English)
Translations performed by *-by-translation-text can be done now without any
workaround under the hood. The query functions are now linted just like
i18n/label, which means static translation keywords must be qualified with :t/,
which is good for consistency.
2023-12-26 14:58:23 +00:00
|
|
|
;; the preloads namespaces because they
|
|
|
|
|
;; will be used directly by Jest in the
|
|
|
|
|
;; option setupFilesAfterEnv.
|
|
|
|
|
test-helpers.component-tests-preload
|
2023-12-19 19:59:07 +00:00
|
|
|
status-im.setup.schema-preload
|
Introduce malli library (#17867)
This commit is the foundational step to start using malli
(https://github.com/metosin/malli) in this project.
Take in consideration we will only be able to realize malli's full power in
future iterations.
For those without context: the mobile team watched a presentation about malli
and went through a light RFC to put everyone on the same page, among other
discussions here and there in PRs.
To keep things relatively short:
1. Unit, integration and component tests will short-circuit (fail) when
inputs/outputs don't conform to their respective function schemas (CI should
fail too).
2. Failed schema checks will not block the app from initializing, nor throw an
exception that would trigger the LogBox. Exceptions are only thrown in the
scope of automated tests.
3. There's zero performance impact in production code because we only
instrument. Instrumentation is removed from the compiled code due to the
usage of "^boolean js.goog/DEBUG".
4. We shouldn't expect any meaningful slowdown during development.
**What are we instrumenting in this PR?**
Per our team's agreement, we're only instrumenting the bare minimum to showcase 2 examples.
- Instrument a utility function utils.money/format-amount using the macro
approach.
- Instrument a quo component quo.components.counter.step.view/view using the
functional approach.
Both approaches are useful, the functional approach is powerful and allow us to
instrument anonymous functions, like the ones we pass to subscriptions or event
handlers, or the higher-order function quo.theme/with-theme. The macro approach
is perfect for functions already defined with defn.
**I evaluated the schema or function in the REPL but nothing changes**
- If you evaluate the source function, you need to evaluate schema/=> or
schema/instrument as well.
- Remember to *var quote* when using schema/instrument.
- You must call "(status-im2.setup.schema/setup!)" after any var is
re-instrumented. It's advisable to add a keybinding in your editor to send
this expression automatically to the CLJS REPL, or add the call at the end of
the namespace you are working on (similar to how some devs add "(run-tests)"
at the end of test namespaces).
**Where should schemas be defined?**
For the moment, we should focus on instrumenting quo components, so define each
function schema in the same namespace as the component's public "view" var.
To be specific:
- A schema used only to instrument a single function and not used elsewhere,
like a quo component schema, wouldn't benefit from being defined in a separate
namespace because that would force the developer to constantly open two files
instead of one to check function signatures.
- A common schema reused across the repo, like ":schema.common/theme" should be
registered in the global registry "schema.registry" so that consumers can just
refer to it by keyword, as if it was a built-in malli schema.
- A common schema describing status-go entities like message, notification,
community, etc can be stored either in the respective
"src/status_im2/contexts/*" or registered globally, or even somewhere else.
This is yet to be defined, but since I chose not to include schemas for them,
we can postpone this guideline.
2023-11-18 14:04:48 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2023-12-20 10:26:57 +00:00
|
|
|
quo.core-spec
|
2023-12-19 19:59:07 +00:00
|
|
|
status-im.core-spec]
|
2023-01-13 09:35:41 +00:00
|
|
|
:ns-regexp "component-spec$"
|
2022-12-20 13:57:49 +00:00
|
|
|
:output-dir "component-spec"
|
Introduce malli library (#17867)
This commit is the foundational step to start using malli
(https://github.com/metosin/malli) in this project.
Take in consideration we will only be able to realize malli's full power in
future iterations.
For those without context: the mobile team watched a presentation about malli
and went through a light RFC to put everyone on the same page, among other
discussions here and there in PRs.
To keep things relatively short:
1. Unit, integration and component tests will short-circuit (fail) when
inputs/outputs don't conform to their respective function schemas (CI should
fail too).
2. Failed schema checks will not block the app from initializing, nor throw an
exception that would trigger the LogBox. Exceptions are only thrown in the
scope of automated tests.
3. There's zero performance impact in production code because we only
instrument. Instrumentation is removed from the compiled code due to the
usage of "^boolean js.goog/DEBUG".
4. We shouldn't expect any meaningful slowdown during development.
**What are we instrumenting in this PR?**
Per our team's agreement, we're only instrumenting the bare minimum to showcase 2 examples.
- Instrument a utility function utils.money/format-amount using the macro
approach.
- Instrument a quo component quo.components.counter.step.view/view using the
functional approach.
Both approaches are useful, the functional approach is powerful and allow us to
instrument anonymous functions, like the ones we pass to subscriptions or event
handlers, or the higher-order function quo.theme/with-theme. The macro approach
is perfect for functions already defined with defn.
**I evaluated the schema or function in the REPL but nothing changes**
- If you evaluate the source function, you need to evaluate schema/=> or
schema/instrument as well.
- Remember to *var quote* when using schema/instrument.
- You must call "(status-im2.setup.schema/setup!)" after any var is
re-instrumented. It's advisable to add a keybinding in your editor to send
this expression automatically to the CLJS REPL, or add the call at the end of
the namespace you are working on (similar to how some devs add "(run-tests)"
at the end of test namespaces).
**Where should schemas be defined?**
For the moment, we should focus on instrumenting quo components, so define each
function schema in the same namespace as the component's public "view" var.
To be specific:
- A schema used only to instrument a single function and not used elsewhere,
like a quo component schema, wouldn't benefit from being defined in a separate
namespace because that would force the developer to constantly open two files
instead of one to check function signatures.
- A common schema reused across the repo, like ":schema.common/theme" should be
registered in the global registry "schema.registry" so that consumers can just
refer to it by keyword, as if it was a built-in malli schema.
- A common schema describing status-go entities like message, notification,
community, etc can be stored either in the respective
"src/status_im2/contexts/*" or registered globally, or even somewhere else.
This is yet to be defined, but since I chose not to include schemas for them,
we can postpone this guideline.
2023-11-18 14:04:48 +00:00
|
|
|
:closure-defines {schema.core/throw-on-error? true}
|
2022-12-20 13:57:49 +00:00
|
|
|
:compiler-options {:warnings-as-errors false
|
Fix component tests, upgrade Jest & friends, and a few other goodies (#18276)
Fix all component tests after the latest RN upgrade.
Fixes https://github.com/status-im/status-mobile/issues/18157
Closes https://github.com/status-im/status-mobile/pull/18235
Dependency changes
- Upgraded Jest: from 26.6.3 to latest 29.7.0.
- Upgraded @testing-library/jest-native: from 5.3.0 to latest 5.4.3
- Upgraded @testing-library/react-native: from 11.5.4 to 12.4.2
- Removed explicit dependency on jest-circus, this is now the default test
runner.
- Removed explicit dependency on jest-environment-node. This is handled by the
package manager.
- Added jest-silent-reporter at version 0.5.0.
### Why component tests were failing?
Many tests were failing because we were using RN Testing Library (RNTL) in an
unreliable fashion. With the recent library upgrades, the unreliability was
excerbated. Other times, the tests were incorrectly arranging data.
### with-redefs does not work with async code
Generally speaking, with-redefs should not be used with async code, assume the
worst. The scope of the macro will cease to exist by the time the async code
runs. In many tests we were using with-redefs, then calling render, but for some
components that use use-effect, JS timers, animations, etc it's unreliable and
were the reason for failures.
It's easy to reproduce too:
```clojure
(defn foo []
:foo)
(foo)
;; => :foo
(with-redefs [foo (constantly :bar)]
(foo))
;; => :bar
(js/setTimeout
(fn []
(tap> [:calling-foo (foo)]))
100)
;; Taps [:calling-foo :foo]
;; As you would expect, when running without with-redefs, it prints :foo.
;; So far so good, but whatch what happens with async code:
(with-redefs [foo (constantly :bar)]
(js/setTimeout
(fn []
(tap> [:calling-foo (foo)]))
100))
;; Taps [:calling-foo :foo]
;; ====> PROBLEM: Taps :foo, not :bar as one might expect
```
### Not waiting on wait-for
When test-helpers.component/wait-for is used, subsequent assertions/etc should
be done after the promise returned by wait-for is resolved. But remember to not
perform side-effects inside the wait-for callback (check out the docs
https://callstack.github.io/react-native-testing-library/docs/api#waitfor).
Most, if not all of our usages of wait-for were not waiting.
#### Improvement 1 - Silence Jest on demand
If you need to re-run component tests frequently, you may want to reduce the
output verbosity. By passing JEST_USE_SILENT_REPORTER=true to make
component-test or make component-test-watch you will see a lot less noise and be
able to focus on what really matters to you.
#### Improvement 2 - Selectively focus/disable tests
Because of our need to first compile CLJS to JS before running tests via Jest,
we couldn't easily skip or focus on specific tests. From this commit onwards, we
should never again have to change the list of requires in files core_spec.cljs.
Commenting out required namespaces gives a bad DX because it causes constant
rebasing issues.
#### Improvement 3 - Translations now work as in prod code (but only English)
Translations performed by *-by-translation-text can be done now without any
workaround under the hood. The query functions are now linted just like
i18n/label, which means static translation keywords must be qualified with :t/,
which is good for consistency.
2023-12-26 14:58:23 +00:00
|
|
|
:warnings {:fn-deprecated false}
|
2022-12-20 13:57:49 +00:00
|
|
|
:static-fns false
|
|
|
|
|
:infer-externs true}}}}
|
