There's only one scenario in which a `RevealedAccount` will have an
empty `ChainIDs` list attached to it:
When the community in question requires users to satisfy certain
criteria to join, and the user's wallet does not own the necessary funds
on any of the supported chains.
If there are **no** permissions to join on the community, then we want
to reveal all (selected) accounts with all supported chainIDs.
This is necessary so that, once the community *does* become
permissioned, it'll have address + chain information from all joined
members.
Closes: https://github.com/status-im/status-desktop/issues/11255
This commit adds new tables to the database and APIs in `Messenger` and
communities `Manager` to store `CheckChannelPermissionsResponse`s.
The responses are stored whenever channel permissions have been checked.
The reason we're doing this is so that clients can retrieve the last
known channel permission state before waiting for onchain checks to
finish.
Sometimes confirmation for raw messages are received before the record
is actually saved in the database.
In this case, the code will preserve the Sent status.
Improve `RequestToJoinCommunity` to accept `Addresses` in the request. If `Addresses` is not empty, we then only pass to the owner the selected addresses. The others are ignored.
Does not validate that the addresses in the slice are part of the user's wallet. Those not part of the wallet are just ignored.
This API is used to get a permission status of all channels of a given
community.
Clients can use this API to get the provided information for all
community channels with a single RPC call instead of doing one call
for each channel separately.
Similar to `CheckPermissionToJoin()` we now get
a `CheckChannelPermissions()` API.
It will rely on the same `PermissionResponse` types, but gives
information about both `ViewOnlyPermissions` and
`ViewAndPostPermissions`.
This seems to be a bug that was introduced when two features, admin
permissions and "always reveal wallet accounts" where merged.
We need to make sure we **first** check the revealed accounts and only
**then** do we perform permission checks on them. Otherwise we can run
into scenarios where fake addresses are used and users will be accepted
to the community.
found
Turns out that, when we return with an error, instead of
a non-statisfied check permissions response, we can run into cases where
members that should be kicked are not kicked.
Change smart contract with new API.
Update gas amount for deployment.
Add Burn() and EstimateBurn() functions.
Add RemainingSupply() functions.
Issue #10816
It happens that an envelope is sent before it's tracked, resulting in
long delays before the envelope is marked as sent.
This commit changes the behavior of the code so that order is now
irrelevant.
When we reply to our own message with an image, we didn't set the URL of
the image of the message, which resulted in the image not being
displayed correctly.
This commit does a few things:
- Adds a migration that adds chainids to communities_request_to_join_revealed_addresses
- Removes RevealedAddress in favor of RevealedAccount which is now a struct that contains the revealed address, as well as the signature and a list of chain IDs on which to check for user funds
- Changes the logic of sending requests to join a community, such that after creating address signatures, the user node will also check which of the addresses has funds on which networks for the community's token permissions, and add the chainds to the RevealedAccount
- Updates checkPermissionToJoin() such that only relevant chainids are used when checking user's funds. Chain IDs are retrieved from RevealedAccounts and matched against token permission criteria chain IDs
There's two scenarios in which we're leaving a community:
We either get kicked or we leave ourselves.
In case of leaving ourselves it's fine to unsubscribe from further
community updates be cause we deliberately chose to leave.
In case of being kicked however, this is different.
Say I'm kicked from a community because its token permissions have
changed, in this case we don't want clients to manually re-subscribe to
the community to get informed when there were further changes.
status-go should rather not unsubscribe if we know for sure we've been
kicked by someone else.
fix flaky test: TestRetrieveBlockedContact
resolve conflict when rebase origin/develop
Feat/sync activity center notification (#3581)
* feat: sync activity center notification
* add test
* fix lint issue
* fix failed test
* addressed feedback from sale
* fix failed test
* addressed feedback from ilmotta
go generate ./protocol/migrations/sqlite/...
feat: add updated_at for syncing activity center notification
* feat: add mutual state update system message
* feat: send mutual state update on accepting CR
* feat: send mutual state update when removing a contact
* fix: don't send MutualStateUpdateMessage over wire
* fix: mutual state update message text fixed
* fix: new clock to ensure system message after CR and add chat to the response
* feat: add AC notification for contact removal
* feat: replace "sent" mutual state system message with "added"
Extended the migration process with a generic way of applying custom
migration code on top of the SQL files. The implementation provides
a safer way to run GO code along with the SQL migrations and possibility
of rolling back the changes in case of failure to keep the database
consistent.
This custom GO migration is needed to extract the status from
the JSON blob receipt and store it in transfers table.
Other changes:
- Add NULL DB value tracking to JSONBlob helper
- Index status column on transfers table
- Remove unnecessary panic calls
- Move log_parser to wallet's common package and use to extract token
identity from the logs
Notes:
- there is already an index on transfers table, sqlite creates one for
each unique constraint therefore add only status to a new index
- the planned refactoring and improvements to the database have been
postponed due to time constraints. Got the time to migrate the data
though, extracting it can be done later for a more efficient
implementation
Update status-desktop #10746
* chore(upgradeSQLCipher): Upgrading SQLCipher to version 5.4.5
Changes:
### github.com/mutecomm/go-sqlcipher
1. The improved crypto argorighms from go-sqlcipher v3 are merged in v4
Tags:
v4.4.2-status.1 - merge `burn_stack` improvement
v4.4.2-status.2 - merge `SHA1` improvement
v4.4.2-status.4- merge 'AES' improvement
2. Fixed `go-sqlcipher` to support v3 database in compatibility mode (`sqlcipher` already supports this) (Tag: v4.4.2-status.3)
3. Upgrade `sqlcipher` to v5.4.5 (Tag: v4.5.4-status.1)
### github.com/status-im/migrate/v4
1. Upgrade `go-sqlcipher` version in `github.com/status-im/migrate/v4`
### status-go
1. Upgrade `go-sqlcipher` and `migrate` modules in status-go
2. Configure the DB connections to open the DB in v3 compatibility mode
* chore(upgradeSQLCipher): Use sqlcipher v3 configuration to encrypt a plain text database
* chore(upgradeSQLCipher): Scanning NULL BLOB value should return nil
Fixing failing tests: TestSyncDeviceSuite/TestPairingSyncDeviceClientAsReceiver; TestSyncDeviceSuite/TestPairingSyncDeviceClientAsSender
Considering the following configuration:
1. Table with BLOB column has 1 NULL value
2. Query the value
3. Rows.Scan(&dest sql.NullString)
Expected: dest.Valid == false; dest.String == nil
Actual: dest.Valid == true; dest.String == ""
* chore: Bump go-sqlcipher version to include NULL BLOB fix
Pascal Precht
Sale Djenic
Khushboo-dev-cpp
Patryk Osmaczko
Ibrahem Khalil
Andrea Maria Piana
Alexander
MishkaRogachev
Jonathan Rainville
Boris Melnik
Mikhail Rogachev
frank
Michal Iskierko
Mykhailo Prakhov
mprakhov
Stefan
Alex Jbanca
Omar Basem