This commit adds new tables to the database and APIs in `Messenger` and
communities `Manager` to store `CheckChannelPermissionsResponse`s.
The responses are stored whenever channel permissions have been checked.
The reason we're doing this is so that clients can retrieve the last
known channel permission state before waiting for onchain checks to
finish.
Sometimes confirmation for raw messages are received before the record
is actually saved in the database.
In this case, the code will preserve the Sent status.
Improve `RequestToJoinCommunity` to accept `Addresses` in the request. If `Addresses` is not empty, we then only pass to the owner the selected addresses. The others are ignored.
Does not validate that the addresses in the slice are part of the user's wallet. Those not part of the wallet are just ignored.
Main changes:
- Refactor activity API to propagate token identities.
- Extend service to convert token identities to symbols for filtering
multi-transaction
- Filter transfers, pending_transactions and multi-transactions based
on the provided token identities
- Return involved token identities in activity API
- Test token filtering
Also:
- Fixed calling cancel on a filer activity completed task to release
resources
Notes:
- Found limitations with the token identity which complicates things
by not allowing to filter by token groups (like token-code does)
Updates status-desktop #11025
This API is used to get a permission status of all channels of a given
community.
Clients can use this API to get the provided information for all
community channels with a single RPC call instead of doing one call
for each channel separately.
Similar to `CheckPermissionToJoin()` we now get
a `CheckChannelPermissions()` API.
It will rely on the same `PermissionResponse` types, but gives
information about both `ViewOnlyPermissions` and
`ViewAndPostPermissions`.
This seems to be a bug that was introduced when two features, admin
permissions and "always reveal wallet accounts" where merged.
We need to make sure we **first** check the revealed accounts and only
**then** do we perform permission checks on them. Otherwise we can run
into scenarios where fake addresses are used and users will be accepted
to the community.
found
Turns out that, when we return with an error, instead of
a non-statisfied check permissions response, we can run into cases where
members that should be kicked are not kicked.
