This commit fixes a special case where the activity filter incremental
updates were reported as new even that they were present in a previous
update.
Updates status-desktop #12120
Refactor the activity filter session API to account for the new structure
Also:
- Refactor test helpers to mock for different chains with mixed answers
- Test implementation
Updates status-desktop #12120
Switch from the prototype of duplicating the SQL filter as a runtime
and keeping them in sync on each event that might invalidate the current
filtered entries to a simpler approach of requesting the filter again
and doing the diff to detect the new changes.
Also add a new reset API to model the new entries design requirements.
The new approach shows less corner-case to handle and follows one source
of truth concept making debugging and future maintenance easier.
Other changes
- Fix pending mocking to work with multiple calls
- Refactor tests to account for the new changes
Updates status-desktop #12120
This commit introduces the first steps towards implementing a session-based activity API to support dynamic updates of the current visualized filter in the wallet activity service. This change is necessary to move away from static paginated filtering, which was previously done in SQL, to a more dynamic approach that can handle updates in real-time.
The main changes include:
- Add basic `EventActivitySessionUpdated` support for pending transactions.
- Added a `TODO.md` file outlining the plan and requirements for dynamic activity updates.
- New session-related API to the `activity.Service`
- `session.go` contains the logic for session management and event processing related to activity updates.
- Add test case for incremental filter updates.
The commit also includes:
- various other minor changes and refactoring to support the new session-based approach.
- Deprecation notices added to the `api.go` file for methods that are no longer used by the status-desktop application.
- Clarification comments added to the `scheduler.go` file regarding replacement policies.
Updates: #12120
ghstack-source-id: a61ef74184
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/status-im/status-go/pull/4480
The reading of the amount for pending transactions was done in the same
way as for transfers table. However, the transfers table has a string
hex representation of the amount, while the pending transactions table
has a binary representation of the amount (*big.Int). This was
triggering the not int warning and value was missing.
Updates status-desktop #12120
In case both to/from addresses are present in the list we were using
the same logic as for transfers. However, this doesn't make sense given
that we can have only one entry in pending activity.
The following cases are still covered
- When the receiver is in addresses we get received
- When both receiver and sender are in the list will get sent
- When the sender is on the list we will get sent
Updates status-desktop #12120
Roman Volosovskyi
Anthony Laibe
Stefan
Dario Gabriel Lipicar
Cuteivist
Anthony Laibe
Sale Djenic
Khushboo-dev-cpp
Ivan Belyakov
Mikhail Rogachev
Igor Sirotin