This commit extends the `AddCommunityToken` API to also expect an
optional `CroppedImage`, which will be used instead of the `ImageBase64`
path provided by `CommunityToken`, to calculate the actual base64
encoded image.
* feat(share-links): Add protobuf and encode/decode url data methods
* feat(new-links-format): Adds generators for new links format
* feat: add parsing for new links format
* feat: add messenger-level pubkey serialization and tests
* feat: fix and test CreateCommunityURLWithChatKey
* feat: impl and test parseCommunityURLWithChatKey
* feat: fix and test CreateCommunityURLWithData
* feat: impl and test parseCommunityURLWithData (not working)
* feat: UrlDataResponse as response share urls api
* feat: impl& tested ShareCommunityChannelURLWithChatKey
* feat: impl & tested ParseCommunityChannelURLWithChatKey
* fix: bring urls to new format
* feat: add regexp for community channel urls
* feat: impl & test contact urls with chatKey, Ens and data
* fix: encodeDataURL/encodeDataURL patch from Samyoul
* fix: fix unmarshalling protobufs
* fix: fix minor issues, temporary comment TestParseUserURLWithENS
* fix: allow url to contain extra `#` in the signature
* fix: check signatures with SigToPub
* chore: lint fixes
* fix: encode the signature
* feat: Check provided channelID is Uuid
* fix(share-community-url): Remove if community encrypted scope
* fix: review fixes
* fix: use proto.Unmarshal instead of json.Marshal
* feat(share-urls): Adds TagsIndices to community data
* feat: support tag indices to community url data
---------
Co-authored-by: Boris Melnik <borismelnik@status.im>
When deleting a message for me, the image url wasn't preserved,
resulting in the image disappearing on the client side.
This commit adds the processing of returned messages so that the image
is preserved.
- Add ERC20 contract
- Add decimals field to community_tokens db table
- Adjusting API to handle assets deployment
- Add decimals field to CommunityTokenMetadata
Issue #10987
Nameserver is passed by the OS on creation/restore, this commit adds the
ability to pass it at login time.
We don't want to store it on disk since that's bound to change, and
currently there's a bug on golang that prevents getting the DNS from the
system on android.
There's only one scenario in which a `RevealedAccount` will have an
empty `ChainIDs` list attached to it:
When the community in question requires users to satisfy certain
criteria to join, and the user's wallet does not own the necessary funds
on any of the supported chains.
If there are **no** permissions to join on the community, then we want
to reveal all (selected) accounts with all supported chainIDs.
This is necessary so that, once the community *does* become
permissioned, it'll have address + chain information from all joined
members.
Closes: https://github.com/status-im/status-desktop/issues/11255
This commit adds new tables to the database and APIs in `Messenger` and
communities `Manager` to store `CheckChannelPermissionsResponse`s.
The responses are stored whenever channel permissions have been checked.
The reason we're doing this is so that clients can retrieve the last
known channel permission state before waiting for onchain checks to
finish.
Sometimes confirmation for raw messages are received before the record
is actually saved in the database.
In this case, the code will preserve the Sent status.
Improve `RequestToJoinCommunity` to accept `Addresses` in the request. If `Addresses` is not empty, we then only pass to the owner the selected addresses. The others are ignored.
Does not validate that the addresses in the slice are part of the user's wallet. Those not part of the wallet are just ignored.
This API is used to get a permission status of all channels of a given
community.
Clients can use this API to get the provided information for all
community channels with a single RPC call instead of doing one call
for each channel separately.
Similar to `CheckPermissionToJoin()` we now get
a `CheckChannelPermissions()` API.
It will rely on the same `PermissionResponse` types, but gives
information about both `ViewOnlyPermissions` and
`ViewAndPostPermissions`.
This seems to be a bug that was introduced when two features, admin
permissions and "always reveal wallet accounts" where merged.
We need to make sure we **first** check the revealed accounts and only
**then** do we perform permission checks on them. Otherwise we can run
into scenarios where fake addresses are used and users will be accepted
to the community.
found
Turns out that, when we return with an error, instead of
a non-statisfied check permissions response, we can run into cases where
members that should be kicked are not kicked.
Change smart contract with new API.
Update gas amount for deployment.
Add Burn() and EstimateBurn() functions.
Add RemainingSupply() functions.
Issue #10816
It happens that an envelope is sent before it's tracked, resulting in
long delays before the envelope is marked as sent.
This commit changes the behavior of the code so that order is now
irrelevant.
When we reply to our own message with an image, we didn't set the URL of
the image of the message, which resulted in the image not being
displayed correctly.
Pascal Precht
Mikhail Rogachev
Andrea Maria Piana
Michal Iskierko
frank
Roman Volosovskyi
Patryk Osmaczko
Sale Djenic
Khushboo-dev-cpp
Ibrahem Khalil
Alexander
MishkaRogachev
Jonathan Rainville
Boris Melnik
Mykhailo Prakhov
mprakhov