Send information to owners and token masters about operations: burn, airdrop, remote destruct.
Add CommunityTokenActionSignal to signalize client side.
Fix#13371
* feat_: add periodical publishing for community grants
feat_: Validate grant when receiving it
feat_: add expiration for grants
feat_: add test for grants expiration
fix_: move grants test to profile showcase, fix a few bugs
* feat_: use one group mesage to update grants
* chore_: review fixes
AmountInWei will have a wei-like units.
Amount field becomes deprecated because it kept string with float value.
Comparison (in case of Decimals == 5):
Amount (deprecated) = "1.2"
AmountInWei = "120000"
Issue #11588
This commit fixes a few issues with communities encryption:
Key distribution was disconnected from the community description, this created a case where the key would arrive after the community description and that would result in the client thinking that it was kicked.
To overcome this, we added a message that signals the user that is kicked. Also, we distribute the key with the community description so that there's no more issues with timing.
This is a bit expensive for large communities, and it will require some further optimizations.
Key distribution is now also connected to the request to join response, so there are no timing issues.
Fixes an issue with key distribution (race condition) where the community would be modified before being compared, resulting in a comparison of two identical communities, which would result in no key being distributed. This commit only partially address the issue.
- use protected topics for communities
- associate chats to pubsub topics and populate these depending if the chat belongs to a community or not
- mailserver functions should be aware of pubsub topics
- generate private key for pubsub topic protection when creating a community
- add shard cluster and index to communities
- setup shards for existing communities
- distribute pubsubtopic password
- fix: do not send the requests to join and cancel in the protected topic
- fix: undefined shard values for backward compatibility
- refactor: use shard message in protobuffers
Prior to this commit a control node would add the revealed addresses to
the member struct on the community description, which exposes all those
addresses to the public.
We don't want that. Revealed addresses are exclusively shared with
control nodes and should stay there (although, they might be privately
shared among token masters, see
https://github.com/status-im/status-desktop/issues/11610).
In this commit, we no longer add the revealed addresses to the community
description. The addresses are already stored in the requestToJoin
database table so we can take them from there if we need them.
Closes: https://github.com/status-im/status-desktop/issues/11573
Adds airdropAddress to the request to join params and a is_airdrop_address flag in the communities_requests_to_join_revealed_addresses table.
This airdropAddress is used by the owner to know which address to use when airdropping
- Add ERC20 contract
- Add decimals field to community_tokens db table
- Adjusting API to handle assets deployment
- Add decimals field to CommunityTokenMetadata
Issue #10987
This commit does a few things:
- Adds a migration that adds chainids to communities_request_to_join_revealed_addresses
- Removes RevealedAddress in favor of RevealedAccount which is now a struct that contains the revealed address, as well as the signature and a list of chain IDs on which to check for user funds
- Changes the logic of sending requests to join a community, such that after creating address signatures, the user node will also check which of the addresses has funds on which networks for the community's token permissions, and add the chainds to the RevealedAccount
- Updates checkPermissionToJoin() such that only relevant chainids are used when checking user's funds. Chain IDs are retrieved from RevealedAccounts and matched against token permission criteria chain IDs
This adds checks to `HandleCommunityRequestToJoin` and
`AcceptRequestToJoinCommunity` that ensure a given user's revealed
wallet addresses own the token funds required by a community.
When community has token permissions of type `BECOME_MEMBER`, the
following happens when the owner receives a request:
1. Upon verifying provided wallet addresses by the requester, the owner
node accumulates all token funds related to the given wallets that
match the token criteria in the configured permissions
2. If the requester does not meet the necessary requirements, the
request to join will be declined. If the requester does have the
funds, he'll either be automatically accepted to the community, or
enters the next stage where an owner needs to manually accept the
request.
3. The the community does not automatically accept users, then the funds
check will happen again, when the owner tries to manually accept the
request. If the necessary funds do not exist at this stage, the
request will be declined
4. Upon accepting, whether automatically or manually, the owner adds the
requester's wallet addresses to the `CommunityDescription`, such that
they can be retrieved later when doing periodic checks or when
permissions have changed.
We need to store the `decimals` of a given token when creating community
permissions so that we can use it later on to do calculations when
checking funds for given wallet addresses.
This commit extends the `CommunityRequestToJoin` with `RevealedAddresses` which represent wallet addresses and signatures provided by the sender, to proof a community owner ownership of those wallet addresses.
**Note: This only works with keystore files maanged by status-go**
At high level, the follwing happens:
1. User instructs Status to send a request to join to a community. By adding a password hash to the instruction, Status will try to unlock the users keystore and verify each wallet account.
2. For every verified wallet account, a signature is created for the following payload, using each wallet's private key
``` keccak256(chatkey + communityID + requestToJoinID) ``` A map of walletAddress->signature is then attached to the community request to join, which will be sent to the community owner
3. The owner node receives the request, and if the community requires users to hold tokens to become a member, it will check and verify whether the given wallet addresses are indeed owned by the sender. If any signature provided by the request cannot be recovered, the request is immediately declined by the owner.
4. The verified addresses are then added to the owner node's database such that, once the request should be accepted, the addresses can be used to check on chain whether they own the necessary funds to fulfill the community's permissions
The checking of required funds is **not** part of this commit. It will be added in a follow-up commit.
Community tokens has some metadata (image, description) which must be kept in waku(CommunityDescription).
Add CommunityTokenMetadata message to communities.proto.
Add []CommunityTokenMetadata to CommunityDescription.
Issue #9545
This is done so that when member join a community by being accepted by
the community owner, they also receive the most up-to-date magnetlink
along with it.
Usually, message IDs are generated by their payload and signature and
in receiving nodes calculated in based on the same data as well.
There's no ID attached to messages in-flight.
This turns out to be a bit of a problem for messages that are being
imported from third party systems like discord, as the conversion
and saving of such messages and handling of their possible assets and
attachments are done in separate steps, which changes the message
payloads after their IDs have been generated.
Hence, we're introducing a `ThirdPartyID` property to `common.Message`
and `protobuf.WakuMessage` so receiving nodes of such messages (via the
archive protocol primarily) can easily detect third party/imported
messages and give them special treatment.
This commit introduces a few changes regarding users accessing
communities:
While the APIs still exist, community invites should no longer be
used, instead communities should merely be "shared".
Sharing a community to users allows users to "join" the community,
which in reality makes them request access to that community.
This means, users have to request access to any community, even if
the community has permissions set to NO_MEMBERSHIP
Only difference between ON_REQUEST and NO_MEMBERSHIP is that
ON_REQUEST communities require manual approval of the owner/admin
to access a community. NO_MEMBERSHIP communities accept
automatically (as soon as owner/admin receives the request).
This also implies that users are no longer optimistically added to the
member list of communities, but only after they have been accepted.
This introduces a bit of a message ping-pong for users to know that
someone is now part of a community
This allows to store community admin settings that are meant to be propagated
to community members (as opposed to the already existing
`CommunitySettings` which are considered local to every account).
The first setting introduced as part of this commit is one that enables
community admins to configure whether or not members of the community
are allowed to pin messages in community channels.
Prior to this commit, this was not restricted at all on the protocol
level and only enforced by clients via UI (e.g. members don't see an
option to pin messages, although they could).
This config setting now ensures that:
1. If turned off, members cannot send a pin message
2. If turned off, pin messages from members are not handled/processed
This is needed by https://github.com/status-im/status-desktop/issues/5662
Michal Iskierko
Mykhailo Prakhov
Mikhail Rogachev
yqrashawn
Patryk Osmaczko
Igor Sirotin
Pablo Lopez
Andrea Maria Piana
richΛrd
Mykhailo Prakhov
Pascal Precht
Jonathan Rainville
frank
Boris Melnik
Pascal Precht
Vitaliy Vlasov