Adding new smart contracts and generated go files.
Deploy token owner function and master token address getter.
Adding deployer and privilegesLevel columns to community_tokens table.
Passing addressFrom to API calls.
Issue #11250
* rm params
* use url data proto
* feat: community channel and user data parsing; improve testing for urls
---------
Co-authored-by: MishkaRogachev <mishkarogachev@gmail.com>
Fixes an issue where if a community had an admin permission, it would be impossible to join as a normal member because the admin permission wasn't satisfied.
Prior to this commit a control node would add the revealed addresses to
the member struct on the community description, which exposes all those
addresses to the public.
We don't want that. Revealed addresses are exclusively shared with
control nodes and should stay there (although, they might be privately
shared among token masters, see
https://github.com/status-im/status-desktop/issues/11610).
In this commit, we no longer add the revealed addresses to the community
description. The addresses are already stored in the requestToJoin
database table so we can take them from there if we need them.
Closes: https://github.com/status-im/status-desktop/issues/11573
This is a bigger change in how community membership requests are handled
among admins, token masters, owners, and control nodes.
Prior to this commit, all privileged users, also known as
`EventSenders`, were able to accept and reject community membership
requests and those changes would be applied by all users.
This commit changes this behaviour such that:
1. EventSenders can make a decision (accept, reject), but merely forward
their decision to the control node, which ultimately has to confirm
it
2. EventSenders are no longer removing or adding members to and from
communities
3. When an eventsender signaled a decision, the membership request will
enter a pending state (acceptedPending or rejectedPending)
4. Once a decision was made by one eventsender, no other eventsender can
override that decision
This implementation is covered with a bunch of tests:
- Ensure that decision made by event sender is shared with other event
senders
- `testAcceptMemberRequestToJoinResponseSharedWithOtherEventSenders()`
- `testRejectMemberRequestToJoinResponseSharedWithOtherEventSenders()`
- Ensure memebrship request stays pending, until control node has
confirmed decision by event senders
- `testAcceptMemberRequestToJoinNotConfirmedByControlNode()`
- `testRejectMemberRequestToJoinNotConfirmedByControlNode()`
- Ensure that decision made by event sender cannot be overriden by other
event senders
- `testEventSenderCannotOverrideRequestToJoinState()`
These test cases live in three test suites for different event sender
types respectively
- `OwnerWithoutCommunityKeyCommunityEventsSuite`
- `TokenMasterCommunityEventsSuite`
- `AdminCommunityEventsSuite`
In addition to the changes mentioned above, there's also a smaller
changes that ensures membership requests to *not* attached revealed wallet
addresses when the requests are sent to event senders (in addition to
control nodes).
Requests send to a control node will still include revealed addresses as
the control node needs them to verify token permissions.
This commit does not yet handle the case of event senders attempting to
kick and ban members.
Similar to accepting and rejecting membership requests, kicking and
banning need a new pending state. However, we don't track such state in
local databases yet so those two cases will be handled in future commit
to not have this commit grow larger.
* feat: proposal for collecting community metrics
https://github.com/status-im/status-desktop/issues/11152
* feat: collecting community message metrics with test
* feat: implement both strategies for fetching community metrics
* fix: review fixes
* fix: calc counts for timestamps
If a message is sent with only 1 image, the album is not generated (no albumID), so then, in the notification handling code, it didn't use the right ID, because it thought it had to use the AlbumID for the message ID
- distribute ratchet keys at both community and channel levels
- use explicit `HashRatchetGroupID` in ecryption layer, instead of
inheriting `groupID` from `CommunityID`
- populate `HashRatchetGroupID` with `CommunityID+ChannelID` for
channels, and `CommunityID` for whole community
- hydrate channels with members; channel members are now subset of
community members
- include channel permissions in periodic permissions check
closes: status-im/status-desktop#10998
This component decouples key distribution from the Messenger, enhancing
code maintainability, extensibility and testability.
It also alleviates the need to impact all methods potentially affecting
encryption keys.
Moreover, it allows key distribution inspection for integration tests.
part of: status-im/status-desktop#10998
Michal Iskierko
Felicio Mununga
Andrea Maria Piana
Mikhail Rogachev
flexsurfer
frank
Patryk Osmaczko
Alexander
Igor Sirotin
Jonathan Rainville
Sale Djenic
Pascal Precht
Mykhailo Prakhov
Volodymyr Kozieiev
Anthony Laibe
Dario Gabriel Lipicar