- share requests to join with new privileged roles during reevaluating member role
- share requests to join with new members, joined the community as TOKEN_MASTER, ADMIN
- share requests to join revealed addresses to ADMINS and TOKEN_MASTERS
- refactor common test functionality to make them more predictable
- removed unused CommunityToken protobuf
refactor: associate chats to pubsub topics and populate these depending if the chat belongs to a community or not
refactor: add pubsub topic to mailserver batches
chore: ensure default relay messages continue working as they should
refactor: mailserver functions should be aware of pubsub topics
fix: use []byte for communityIDs
Adding new smart contracts and generated go files.
Deploy token owner function and master token address getter.
Adding deployer and privilegesLevel columns to community_tokens table.
Passing addressFrom to API calls.
Issue #11250
Fixes an issue where if a community had an admin permission, it would be impossible to join as a normal member because the admin permission wasn't satisfied.
Prior to this commit a control node would add the revealed addresses to
the member struct on the community description, which exposes all those
addresses to the public.
We don't want that. Revealed addresses are exclusively shared with
control nodes and should stay there (although, they might be privately
shared among token masters, see
https://github.com/status-im/status-desktop/issues/11610).
In this commit, we no longer add the revealed addresses to the community
description. The addresses are already stored in the requestToJoin
database table so we can take them from there if we need them.
Closes: https://github.com/status-im/status-desktop/issues/11573
This is a bigger change in how community membership requests are handled
among admins, token masters, owners, and control nodes.
Prior to this commit, all privileged users, also known as
`EventSenders`, were able to accept and reject community membership
requests and those changes would be applied by all users.
This commit changes this behaviour such that:
1. EventSenders can make a decision (accept, reject), but merely forward
their decision to the control node, which ultimately has to confirm
it
2. EventSenders are no longer removing or adding members to and from
communities
3. When an eventsender signaled a decision, the membership request will
enter a pending state (acceptedPending or rejectedPending)
4. Once a decision was made by one eventsender, no other eventsender can
override that decision
This implementation is covered with a bunch of tests:
- Ensure that decision made by event sender is shared with other event
senders
- `testAcceptMemberRequestToJoinResponseSharedWithOtherEventSenders()`
- `testRejectMemberRequestToJoinResponseSharedWithOtherEventSenders()`
- Ensure memebrship request stays pending, until control node has
confirmed decision by event senders
- `testAcceptMemberRequestToJoinNotConfirmedByControlNode()`
- `testRejectMemberRequestToJoinNotConfirmedByControlNode()`
- Ensure that decision made by event sender cannot be overriden by other
event senders
- `testEventSenderCannotOverrideRequestToJoinState()`
These test cases live in three test suites for different event sender
types respectively
- `OwnerWithoutCommunityKeyCommunityEventsSuite`
- `TokenMasterCommunityEventsSuite`
- `AdminCommunityEventsSuite`
In addition to the changes mentioned above, there's also a smaller
changes that ensures membership requests to *not* attached revealed wallet
addresses when the requests are sent to event senders (in addition to
control nodes).
Requests send to a control node will still include revealed addresses as
the control node needs them to verify token permissions.
This commit does not yet handle the case of event senders attempting to
kick and ban members.
Similar to accepting and rejecting membership requests, kicking and
banning need a new pending state. However, we don't track such state in
local databases yet so those two cases will be handled in future commit
to not have this commit grow larger.
- distribute ratchet keys at both community and channel levels
- use explicit `HashRatchetGroupID` in ecryption layer, instead of
inheriting `groupID` from `CommunityID`
- populate `HashRatchetGroupID` with `CommunityID+ChannelID` for
channels, and `CommunityID` for whole community
- hydrate channels with members; channel members are now subset of
community members
- include channel permissions in periodic permissions check
closes: status-im/status-desktop#10998
This component decouples key distribution from the Messenger, enhancing
code maintainability, extensibility and testability.
It also alleviates the need to impact all methods potentially affecting
encryption keys.
Moreover, it allows key distribution inspection for integration tests.
part of: status-im/status-desktop#10998
**This is a breaking change!**
Prior to this commit we had `AddCommunityToken(token *communities,
croppedImage CroppedImage)` that we used to
1. add a `CommunityToken` to the user's database and
2. to create a `CommunityTokenMetadata` from it which is then added to
the community's `CommunityDescription` and published to its members
However, I've then discovered that we need to separate these two things,
such that we can deploy a community token, then add it to the database
only for tracking purposes, **then** add it to the community description
(and propagate to members) once we know that the deploy tx indeed went
through.
To implement this, this commit introduces a new API
`SaveCommunityToken(token *communities.CommunityToken, croppedImage
CroppedImage)` which adds the token to the database only and doesn't
touch the community description.
The `AddCommunityToken` API is then changed that it's exclusively used
for adding an already saved `CommunityToken` to the community
description so it can be published to members. Hence, the signature is
now `AddCommunityToken(communityID string, chainID int, address
string)`, which makes this a breaking change.
Clients that used `AddCommunityToken()` before now need to ensure that
they first call `SaveCommunityToken()` as `AddCommunityToken()` will
fail otherwise.
* chore: make the owner without the community private key behave like an admin
* Add test for the owner without community key
* chore: refactor Community fn names related to the roles
- Fixed redundant permissions check. If community is set to auto-accept,
then permissions would be checked twice, in
`HandleCommunityRequestToJoin` and `AcceptRequestToJoinCommunity`.
Mitigated it by returning from `HandleCommunityRequestToJoin` immediately
in case of auto-accept.
- Extracted `accountsSatisfyPermissionsToJoin` to remove code
duplication and simplify the logic.
* feat: add api to remove private key and separete owner from private key ownership
For https://github.com/status-im/status-desktop/issues/11475
* feat: introduce IsControlNode for Community
* feat: remove community private key from syncing
* feat: add IsControlNode flag to Community json serialisation
* Update protocol/protobuf/pairing.proto
Co-authored-by: Jonathan Rainville <rainville.jonathan@gmail.com>
---------
Co-authored-by: Jonathan Rainville <rainville.jonathan@gmail.com>
Patryk Osmaczko
Dario Gabriel Lipicar
Mykhailo Prakhov
Anthony Laibe
Jonathan Rainville
Andrea Maria Piana
Michal Iskierko
Richard Ramos
frank
Pascal Precht
Samuel Hawksby-Robinson
Mikhail Rogachev