If one request failed, the whole batch would fail.
This caused issue as one of the contract is constantly returning an
error now, and essentially there was not way to fetch balance.
Also extend the timeout to 20s as we throw 165 request to Infura in one
go and it takes its time to reply to those, although it seems like we
should batch them on our side instead of sending them all cuncurrently.
For some reason when calling saveChat from desktop with `lastMessage`
set to null, a sigsev is received.
The issue seems to be in logFormat
05280a7ae3/log/format.go (L356)
which for some reason blows up if passed a nil pointer (`lastMessage`).
Can't replicate on any other platform or running it locally, but hey,
this fixes the issue.
StartWallet was called before service initialization.
After the recent changes this call was moved after initialization, but
the geth system automatically start services.
This meant that `IsStarted()` returned true, although the reactor was
not started, and only after calling `StopWallet()` and `StartWallet()`
again the system would reach the right state.
This commit changes the behavior so that we only check whether the
reactor has been started when calling `IsStarted()` and we allow
multiple calls to `Start()` on the signal service, which won't return an
error (it's a noop if callled multiple times).
Incentivisation was an experiment in running an incentivised fleet that
rewarded nodes based on their well behavior. It was heavily influenced
by https://docs.loki.network/ . It is currently not used anymore, so
removing.
* fix: close resultsets so we don't leak them
* Refactor browsers/database
To implement PR suggestions and improve code quality.
* Refactor services/permissions/database
To implement PR suggestions and improve code quality.
Co-authored-by: Samuel Hawksby-Robinson <samuel@samyoul.com>
Why make the change?
As discussed previously, the way we will move across versions is to maintain completely separate
codebases and eventually remove those that are not supported anymore.
This has the drawback of some code duplication, but the advantage is that is more
explicit what each version requires, and changes in one version will not
impact the other, so we won't pile up backward compatible code.
This is the same strategy used by `whisper` in go ethereum and is influenced by
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oyLBGkS5ICk .
All the code that is used for the networking protocol is now under `v0/`.
Some of the common parts might still be refactored out.
The main namespace `waku` deals with `host`->`waku` interactions (through RPC),
while `v0` deals with `waku`->`remote-waku` interactions.
In order to support `v1`, the namespace `v0` will be copied over, and changed to
support `v1`. Once `v0` will be not used anymore, the whole namespace will be removed.
This PR does not actually implement `v1`, I'd rather get things looked over to
make sure the structure is what we would like before implementing the changes.
What has changed?
- Moved all code for the common parts under `waku/common/` namespace
- Moved code used for bloomfilters in `waku/common/bloomfilter.go`
- Removed all version specific code from `waku/common/const` (`ProtocolVersion`, status-codes etc)
- Added interfaces for `WakuHost` and `Peer` under `waku/common/protocol.go`
Things still to do
Some tests in `waku/` are still testing by stubbing components of a particular version (`v0`).
I started moving those tests to instead of stubbing using the actual component, which increases
the testing surface. Some other tests that can't be easily ported should be likely moved under
`v0` instead. Ideally no version specif code should be exported from a version namespace (for
example the various codes, as those might change across versions). But this will be a work-in-progress.
Some code that will be common in `v0`/`v1` could still be extract to avoid duplication, and duplicated only
when implementations diverge across versions.
Andrea Maria Piana
andrey
Gheorghe Pinzaru
RichΛrd
Roman Volosovskyi
André Medeiros
Adam Babik
Jakub Sokołowski