This avoids locking of the community until the end of reevaluation.
There is no special handling for community changes while reevaluation is
ongoing. If members are added or removed, the function will behave
correctly. If permissions are changed, they will be accommodated in the
next reevaluation.
fixes: status-im/status-desktop#14775
* fix_: prevent publishing older community description
* fix_: schedule member reevaluation instead of reevaluating in parallel
* fix_: lock community on members reevaluation
* fix(TestJoinCommunityAsAdminWithMemberAndAdminPermission)_: setup waitOnCommunitiesEvent in advance
* fix(TestEditSharedAddresses)_: remove redundant community description retrieval
AmountInWei will have a wei-like units.
Amount field becomes deprecated because it kept string with float value.
Comparison (in case of Decimals == 5):
Amount (deprecated) = "1.2"
AmountInWei = "120000"
Issue #11588
The test was flaky because of re-receiving the message, which resulted
in multiple identical requestsToJoin being added to messengerResponse.
We should in general avoid using arrays in messengerResponse and prefer
maps for exactly this reason.
This commit fixes a few issues with communities encryption:
Key distribution was disconnected from the community description, this created a case where the key would arrive after the community description and that would result in the client thinking that it was kicked.
To overcome this, we added a message that signals the user that is kicked. Also, we distribute the key with the community description so that there's no more issues with timing.
This is a bit expensive for large communities, and it will require some further optimizations.
Key distribution is now also connected to the request to join response, so there are no timing issues.
Fixes an issue with key distribution (race condition) where the community would be modified before being compared, resulting in a comparison of two identical communities, which would result in no key being distributed. This commit only partially address the issue.
This commit adds basic syncing capabilities with peers if they are both
online.
It updates the work done on MVDS, but I decided to create the code in
status-go instead, since it's very tight to the application (similarly
the code that was the inspiration for mvds, bramble, is all tight
together at the database level).
I reused parts of the protobufs.
The flow is:
1) An OFFER message is sent periodically with a bunch of message-ids and
group-ids.
2) Anyone can REQUEST some of those messages if not present in their
database.
3) The peer will then send over those messages.
It's disabled by default, but I am planning to add a way to set up the
flags.
This commit fixes 3 issues:
1) In some cases, the hash ratchet was not correctly found
2) Out of order messages were not processed correctly as the wrong error
was returned
3) Batched non datasync messages were not processed correctly
Fixes: #4170
- share requests to join with new privileged roles during reevaluating member role
- share requests to join with new members, joined the community as TOKEN_MASTER, ADMIN
- share requests to join revealed addresses to ADMINS and TOKEN_MASTERS
- refactor common test functionality to make them more predictable
- removed unused CommunityToken protobuf
Fixes an issue where if a community had an admin permission, it would be impossible to join as a normal member because the admin permission wasn't satisfied.
Prior to this commit a control node would add the revealed addresses to
the member struct on the community description, which exposes all those
addresses to the public.
We don't want that. Revealed addresses are exclusively shared with
control nodes and should stay there (although, they might be privately
shared among token masters, see
https://github.com/status-im/status-desktop/issues/11610).
In this commit, we no longer add the revealed addresses to the community
description. The addresses are already stored in the requestToJoin
database table so we can take them from there if we need them.
Closes: https://github.com/status-im/status-desktop/issues/11573