Addressed some more feedback

This commit is contained in:
Samuel Hawksby-Robinson 2024-03-15 11:42:55 +00:00
parent 0f55d60faf
commit ade85df3a5
1 changed files with 20 additions and 17 deletions

View File

@ -9,8 +9,8 @@
- Prove that the functionality performs as described
- Can be falsified
- Are resistant to fuzzing
- All new `integration tests` MUST BE validated via 10000 tests.
- This can be achieved using the `-count` or `-test.count` flag with the test command eg: `-count 10000` / `-test.count 10000`
- All new `integration tests` MUST BE validated via a minimum of 1000 tests.
- This can be achieved using the `-count` or `-test.count` flag with the test command eg: `-count 1000` / `-test.count 1000`
- Where the CI can not support this work flow automatically, the developer MUST perform validation tests via local testing.
- `TODO` Add link to issue for CI automation of validation test runs of new `integration tests`.
- Ensuring that the test passes consistently every time gives confidence that the test is not flaky.
@ -39,7 +39,10 @@ Determine who caused the flaky test.
flowchart TB
A([PR ready for merge]) --> B{Have any test failed?}
B -->|No| C[🎉 Proceed with merge 🪄]
B -->|Yes| D{Did you write the test for this PR?}
B -->|Yes| D{
Is the failing test introduced
or altered by this PR?
}
D -->|No| E[Check rerun reports.]
D -->|Yes| F[
It is likely your changes introduced the flakiness.
@ -53,9 +56,9 @@ flowchart TB
```
#### Reporting Flaky Tests
- If an old test fails and/or seems flaky either locally or in CI, you MUST report the event.
- Check the `status-go` GitHub repo issues for the test name(s) failing.
- If the test appears in the list of flaky test issues
If an old test fails and/or seems flaky either locally or in CI, you MUST report the event.
- Check the `status-go` GitHub repo issues for the test name(s) failing.
- If the test appears in the list of flaky test issues
- If the issue is open
- Add a comment to the issue
- Detail that you have experienced the test being flaky and in what context (local vs CI, link to the PR or branch).
@ -63,7 +66,7 @@ flowchart TB
- Reopen the issue OR create a new issue referencing the previous issue
- Either is fine, use your best judgement in this case.
- Detail that you have experienced the test being flaky and in what context (local vs CI, link to the PR or branch).
- If the test does not appear in the list of flaky test issues
- If the test does not appear in the list of flaky test issues
- create a new issue
- The issue title should include the flaky test name
- The issue should use the https://github.com/status-im/status-go/labels/E%3AFlaky%20Test label