Updating the `Undo` test that compares the `Undo` done in StatusChatInput with a standard TextEdit component.
Undo/Redo feature was changed by https://github.com/status-im/status-desktop/pull/12262. Now we're using a custom undo/redo logic and the undo is more granular as opposed to TextEdit.
The non-standard derivation path was not allowed to be entered so paths
with custom indexes were not allowed.
Also implemented warning for non-ethereum coin
Added more tests for the new specifications
Other minor improvements and fixes
Closes#10135
The enforcing of the derivation path editing rules is done in a structured
way by handling all the changes on the array of `Element` stored in
d.elements and then recomposing the HTML string to be displayed after
every change.
Main limitation is the workaround in `onTextChanged` that regenerates
the text in order to dismiss foreign characters introduced by pasting
which I couldn't find a way to disable without disabling also the ability
to copy content to clipboard.
Highlights:
- Implement DerivationPathInput control that intercepts the modifiable
keyboard events in order to edit the visible TextEdit.text while
respecting the requirements of the derivation path editing
- Implement a JS Controller that handles the logic of the
decomposing and recomposing the derivation path string
- Add anew StatusQ with the TextEdit basic look and feel to be used
in DerivationPathInput control without duplicating the style
- Allow passing modifiable events that are not generating characters in
order to allow copy to clipboard
- Disable add account when control is in error state
- Limit to maximum 5 elements in the derivation path
Testing:
- Integrate the control with StoryBook for a quick preview of the
control
- Add unit tests for the Controller basic functionality and regression
for the main control Item
- Removed forcing x64 architecture on apple arm64 hardware from the
storybook build configuration
Note: initially the implementation was suppose to be simple parse the
derivation path string edit elements and format it. However, I could not
find a quick way fix the circular dependency issue between editing the
text and reformatting it. The solution was to use a one way from the
structured data to the formatted string which complicates the
implementation logic.
Closes: #9890
1. Don't allow mention invalidation by altering mention with mouse or keyboard
2. Don't allow mention duplication on the same position
3. Clean mentions after text with mentions changes
4. Fix mention selection
5. Make sure mention is separated by text with valid separators (we're using only space)
6. Cursor will consider the mention as an object and will jump over it as it would be a single character (placing cursor inside leaves room for mention invalidation)
Igor Sirotin
Michał Cieślak
Alex Jbanca
Stefan