sqlcipher/test/tkt3718.test

# 2001 September 15
#
# The author disclaims copyright to this source code.  In place of
# a legal notice, here is a blessing:
#
#    May you do good and not evil.
#    May you find forgiveness for yourself and forgive others.
#    May you share freely, never taking more than you give.
#
#***********************************************************************
# This file implements regression tests for SQLite library.  The
# focus of this file is testing the execution of SQL statements from
# within callbacks generated by VMs that themselves open statement 
# transactions.
#
# $Id: tkt3718.test,v 1.2 2009/06/05 17:09:12 drh Exp $

set testdir [file dirname $argv0]
source $testdir/tester.tcl

do_test tkt3718-1.1 {
  execsql {
    CREATE TABLE t1(a PRIMARY KEY, b);
    INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(1, 'one');
    INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(2, 'two');
    INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(3, 'three');
    INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(4, 'four');
    INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(5, 'five');
    CREATE TABLE t2(a PRIMARY KEY, b);
  }
} {}

# SQL scalar function:
#
#   f1(<arg>)
#
# Uses database handle [db] to execute "SELECT f2(<arg>)". Returns either
# the results or error message from the "SELECT f2(<arg>)" query to the
# caller.
#
proc f1 {args} {
  set a [lindex $args 0]
  catch { db eval {SELECT f2($a)} } msg
  set msg
}

# SQL scalar function:
#
#   f2(<arg>)
#
# Return the value of <arg>. Unless <arg> is "three", in which case throw
# an exception.
#
proc f2 {args} {
  set a [lindex $args 0]
  if {$a == "three"} { error "Three!!" }
  return $a
}

db func f1 f1
db func f2 f2

# The second INSERT statement below uses the f1 user function such that
# half-way through the INSERT operation f1() will run an SQL statement
# that throws an exception. At one point, before #3718 was fixed, this
# caused the statement transaction belonging to the INSERT statement to
# be rolled back. The result was that some (but not all) of the rows that 
# should have been inserted went missing.
#
do_test tkt3718-1.2 {
  execsql {
    BEGIN;
    INSERT INTO t2 SELECT a, b FROM t1;
    INSERT INTO t2 SELECT a+5, f1(b) FROM t1;
    COMMIT;
  }
  execsql {
    SELECT a FROM t2;
  }
} {1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10}

# This test turns on the count_changes pragma (causing DML statements to
# return SQLITE_ROW once, with a single integer result value reporting the
# number of rows affected by the statement). It then executes an INSERT
# statement that requires a statement journal. After stepping the statement
# once, so that it returns SQLITE_ROW, a second SQL statement that throws an
# exception is run. At one point, before #3718 was fixed, this caused the
# statement transaction belonging to the INSERT statement to be rolled back.
# The result was that none of the rows were actually inserted.
# 
#
do_test tkt3718-1.3 {
  execsql { 
    DELETE FROM t2 WHERE a > 5;
    PRAGMA count_changes = 1;
    BEGIN;
  }
  db eval {INSERT INTO t2 SELECT a+5, b||'+5' FROM t1} {
    catch { db eval {SELECT f2('three')} } msg
  }
  execsql {
    COMMIT;
    SELECT a FROM t2;
  }
} {1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10}

do_test tkt3718-1.4 {
  execsql {pragma count_changes=0}
} {}

# This SQL function executes the SQL specified as an argument against
# database [db].
#
proc sql {doit zSql} {
  if {$doit} { catchsql $zSql }
}
db func sql [list sql]

# The following tests, tkt3718-2.*, test that a nested statement 
# transaction can be successfully committed or reverted without 
# affecting the parent statement transaction.
#
do_test tkt3718-2.1 {
  execsql { SELECT sql(1, 'DELETE FROM t2 WHERE a = '||a ) FROM t2 WHERE a>5 }
  execsql { SELECT a from t2 }
} {1 2 3 4 5}
do_test tkt3718-2.2 {
  execsql {
    DELETE FROM t2 WHERE a > 5;
    BEGIN;
    INSERT INTO t2 SELECT a+5, sql(a==3,
        'INSERT INTO t2 SELECT a+10, f2(b) FROM t1'
    ) FROM t1;
  }
  execsql {
    COMMIT;
    SELECT a FROM t2;
  }
} {1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10}
do_test tkt3718-2.3 {
  execsql {
    DELETE FROM t2 WHERE a > 5;
    BEGIN;
    INSERT INTO t2 SELECT a+5, sql(a==3,
        'INSERT INTO t2 SELECT a+10, b FROM t1'
    ) FROM t1;
    COMMIT;
  }
  execsql { SELECT a FROM t2 ORDER BY a+0}
} {1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15}
integrity_check tkt3718.2-4

# The next set of tests, tkt3718-3.*, test that a statement transaction
# that has a committed statement transaction nested inside of it can
# be committed or reverted.
#
foreach {tn io ii results} {
  1 0 10 {1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20}
  2 1 10 {6 7 8 9 10 16 17 18 19 20}
  3 0 11 {1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 16 17 18 19 20}
  4 1 11 {6 7 8 9 10 16 17 18 19 20}
} {
  do_test tkt3718-3.$tn {
    execsql { 
      DELETE FROM t2;
      INSERT INTO t2 SELECT a+5, b FROM t1;
      INSERT INTO t2 SELECT a+15, b FROM t1;
    }

    catchsql "
      BEGIN;
      INSERT INTO t2 SELECT a+$io, sql(a==3,
          'INSERT INTO t2 SELECT a+$ii, b FROM t1'
      ) FROM t1;
    "

    execsql { COMMIT }

    execsql { SELECT a FROM t2 ORDER BY a+0}
  } $results

  integrity_check tkt3718-3.$tn.integrity
}

# This is the same test as tkt3718-3.*, but with 3 levels of nesting.
#
foreach {tn i1 i2 i3 results} {
  1   0 10 20   {5 10 15 20 25 30}
  2   0 10 21   {5 10 15 20 30}
  3   0 11 20   {5 10 20 30}
  4   0 11 21   {5 10 20 30}
  5   1 10 20   {10 20 30}
  6   1 10 21   {10 20 30}
  7   1 11 20   {10 20 30}
  8   1 11 21   {10 20 30}
} {
  do_test tkt3718-4.$tn {
    execsql { 
      DELETE FROM t2;
      INSERT INTO t2 SELECT a+5, b FROM t1;
      INSERT INTO t2 SELECT a+15, b FROM t1;
      INSERT INTO t2 SELECT a+25, b FROM t1;
    }

    catchsql "
      BEGIN;
      INSERT INTO t2 SELECT a+$i1, sql(a==3,
          'INSERT INTO t2 SELECT a+$i2, sql(a==3, 
             ''INSERT INTO t2 SELECT a+$i3, b FROM t1''
           ) FROM t1'
      ) FROM t1;
    "

    execsql { COMMIT }

    execsql { SELECT a FROM t2 WHERE (a%5)==0 ORDER BY a+0}
  } $results

  do_test tkt3718-4.$tn.extra {
    execsql {
      SELECT 
        (SELECT sum(a) FROM t2)==(SELECT sum(a*5-10) FROM t2 WHERE (a%5)==0)
    }
  } {1}

  integrity_check tkt3718-4.$tn.integrity
}


finish_test