status-im
/
spiff-arena
mirror of https://github.com/status-im/spiff-arena.git
2
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

do not call serialize if we can use the cached bpmn_json instead w/ burnettk

This commit is contained in:
jasquat 2023-02-23 13:48:27 -05:00
parent b8becd1b76
commit e4431500fc
No known key found for this signature in database
1 changed files with 12 additions and 13 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

25
spiffworkflow-backend/src/spiffworkflow_backend/services/process_instance_processor.py
View File

@ -776,12 +776,12 @@ class ProcessInstanceProcessor:
Rerturns: {process_name: [task_1, task_2, ...], ...}
"""
serialized_data = json.loads(self.serialize())
processes: dict[str, list[str]] = {serialized_data["spec"]["name"]: []}
for task_name, _task_spec in serialized_data["spec"]["task_specs"].items():
processes[serialized_data["spec"]["name"]].append(task_name)
if "subprocess_specs" in serialized_data:
for subprocess_name, subprocess_details in serialized_data[
bpmn_json = json.loads(self.process_instance_model.bpmn_json or '{}')
processes: dict[str, list[str]] = {bpmn_json["spec"]["name"]: []}
for task_name, _task_spec in bpmn_json["spec"]["task_specs"].items():
processes[bpmn_json["spec"]["name"]].append(task_name)
if "subprocess_specs" in bpmn_json:
for subprocess_name, subprocess_details in bpmn_json[
"subprocess_specs"
].items():
processes[subprocess_name] = []
@ -816,7 +816,7 @@ class ProcessInstanceProcessor:
#################################################################
def get_all_task_specs(self) -> dict[str, dict]:
def get_all_task_specs(self, bpmn_json: dict) -> dict[str, dict]:
"""This looks both at top level task_specs and subprocess_specs in the serialized data.
It returns a dict of all task specs based on the task name like it is in the serialized form.
@ -824,10 +824,9 @@ class ProcessInstanceProcessor:
NOTE: this may not fully work for tasks that are NOT call activities since their task_name may not be unique
but in our current use case we only care about the call activities here.
"""
serialized_data = json.loads(self.serialize())
spiff_task_json = serialized_data["spec"]["task_specs"] or {}
if "subprocess_specs" in serialized_data:
for _subprocess_name, subprocess_details in serialized_data[
spiff_task_json = bpmn_json["spec"]["task_specs"] or {}
if "subprocess_specs" in bpmn_json:
for _subprocess_name, subprocess_details in bpmn_json[
"subprocess_specs"
].items():
if "task_specs" in subprocess_details:
@ -849,8 +848,8 @@ class ProcessInstanceProcessor:
Also note that subprocess_task_id might in fact be a call activity, because spiff treats
call activities like subprocesses in terms of the serialization.
"""
bpmn_json = json.loads(self.serialize())
spiff_task_json = self.get_all_task_specs()
bpmn_json = json.loads(self.process_instance_model.bpmn_json or '{}')
spiff_task_json = self.get_all_task_specs(bpmn_json)
subprocesses_by_child_task_ids = {}
task_typename_by_task_id = {}