Feature/fix filters (#670)

* work in progress

* respect multiple filters for the same field

---------

Co-authored-by: burnettk <burnettk@users.noreply.github.com>

spiffworkflow-backend/src/spiffworkflow_backend/services/process_instance_report_service.py

@@ -626,18 +626,16 @@ class ProcessInstanceReportService:
             instance_metadata_alias = aliased(ProcessInstanceMetadataModel)
             instance_metadata_aliases[column["accessor"]] = instance_metadata_alias
 
-            filter_for_column = None
+            filters_for_column = []
             if "filter_by" in report_metadata:
-                filter_for_column = next(
-                    (f for f in report_metadata["filter_by"] if f["field_name"] == column["accessor"]),
-                    None,
-                )
+                filters_for_column = [f for f in report_metadata["filter_by"] if f["field_name"] == column["accessor"]]
             isouter = True
             join_conditions = [
                 ProcessInstanceModel.id == instance_metadata_alias.process_instance_id,
                 instance_metadata_alias.key == column["accessor"],
             ]
-            if filter_for_column:
+            if len(filters_for_column) > 0:
+                for filter_for_column in filters_for_column:
                     isouter = False
                     if "operator" not in filter_for_column or filter_for_column["operator"] == "equals":
                         join_conditions.append(instance_metadata_alias.value == filter_for_column["field_value"])
@@ -648,7 +646,9 @@ class ProcessInstanceReportService:
                     elif filter_for_column["operator"] == "less_than":
                         join_conditions.append(instance_metadata_alias.value < filter_for_column["field_value"])
                     elif filter_for_column["operator"] == "contains":
-                    join_conditions.append(instance_metadata_alias.value.like(f"%{filter_for_column['field_value']}%"))
+                        join_conditions.append(
+                            instance_metadata_alias.value.like(f"%{filter_for_column['field_value']}%")
+                        )
                     elif filter_for_column["operator"] == "is_empty":
                         # we still need to return results if the metadata value is null so make sure it's outer join
                         isouter = True

spiffworkflow-backend/tests/spiffworkflow_backend/helpers/base_test.py

@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ from spiffworkflow_backend.models.process_group import ProcessGroup
 from spiffworkflow_backend.models.process_group import ProcessGroupSchema
 from spiffworkflow_backend.models.process_instance import ProcessInstanceModel
 from spiffworkflow_backend.models.process_instance_metadata import ProcessInstanceMetadataModel
+from spiffworkflow_backend.models.process_instance_report import FilterValue
 from spiffworkflow_backend.models.process_instance_report import ProcessInstanceReportModel
 from spiffworkflow_backend.models.process_instance_report import ReportMetadata
 from spiffworkflow_backend.models.process_model import NotificationType
@@ -495,8 +496,14 @@ class BaseTest:
         process_instance: ProcessInstanceModel,
         operator: str,
         filter_field_value: str = "",
+        filters: list[FilterValue] | None = None,
         expect_to_find_instance: bool = True,
     ) -> None:
+        if filters is None:
+            filters = []
+
+        first_filter: FilterValue = {"field_name": "key1", "field_value": filter_field_value, "operator": operator}
+        filters.append(first_filter)
         report_metadata: ReportMetadata = {
             "columns": [
                 {"Header": "ID", "accessor": "id", "filterable": False},
@@ -504,7 +511,7 @@ class BaseTest:
                 {"Header": "Key two", "accessor": "key2", "filterable": False},
             ],
             "order_by": ["status"],
-            "filter_by": [{"field_name": "key1", "field_value": filter_field_value, "operator": operator}],
+            "filter_by": filters,
         }
         process_instance_report = ProcessInstanceReportModel.create_report(
             identifier=f"{process_instance.id}_sure",
@@ -520,9 +527,10 @@ class BaseTest:
             assert response.json["results"][0]["id"] == process_instance.id
         else:
             if len(response.json["results"]) == 1:
+                first_result = response.json["results"][0]
                 assert (
-                    response.json["results"][0]["id"] != process_instance.id
-                ), "expected not to find a specific process instance, but we found it"
+                    first_result["id"] != process_instance.id
+                ), f"expected not to find a specific process instance, but we found it: {first_result}"
             else:
                 assert len(response.json["results"]) == 0
         db.session.delete(process_instance_report)

spiffworkflow-backend/tests/spiffworkflow_backend/integration/test_process_api.py

@@ -2957,6 +2957,19 @@ class TestProcessApi(BaseTest):
             operator="greater_than_or_equal_to",
             filter_field_value="value1",
         )
+
+        # these two filters are conflicting, hence the expect_to_find_instance=False
+        # this test was written because, at the time, only one filter per field was being applied,
+        # so the code ignored the less_than and the test passed.
+        self.assert_report_with_process_metadata_operator_includes_instance(
+            client=client,
+            user=with_super_admin_user,
+            process_instance=process_instance_one,
+            operator="less_than",
+            filter_field_value="value1",
+            filters=[{"field_name": "key1", "field_value": "value1", "operator": "greater_than_or_equal_to"}],
+            expect_to_find_instance=False,
+        )
         self.assert_report_with_process_metadata_operator_includes_instance(
             client=client, user=with_super_admin_user, process_instance=process_instance_two, operator="is_empty"
         )