From d817fb2edc8632168b0a0ff7571c29fccad733b8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Oskar Thoren Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2019 17:18:02 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] remove fluff --- x7.md | 49 +------------------------------------------------ 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 48 deletions(-) diff --git a/x7.md b/x7.md index aefb7aa..ee22457 100644 --- a/x7.md +++ b/x7.md @@ -9,53 +9,6 @@ created: 2019-04-18 updated: --- -## Introduction - -## Requirements - -TODO: Elaborate on requirement such as devp2p and possibly Whisper, and geth/parity/nimbus gotchas. - -## Design goals - -TODO: Elaborate on selection of design goals such as -Privacy - -Sender Anonymity -Recipient Anonymity -Particip. Anonymity -Unlinkability -Global Adv. Resistant -Usability - -Contact Discovery -No Message Delays -No Message Drops -Easy Initialization -No Fees Required -Adoption - -Topology Independent -No Additional Service -Spam/Flood Resistant -Low Storage -Low Bandwidth -Low Computation -Asynchronous -Scalable - -NOTE: We are probably not fulfilling all of these very well, and this is something we can note as well. "Ideally such a layer would provide...currently this isn't doing and we are doing further research into better options." - - -# Raw import from previous document - -**TODO: Specify transport privacy through Whisper and guarantees** - -See https://notes.status.im/sDKuBAiPSH6iB9cFmEKLyg?both# for things that we want to capture here. - -*NOTE: Using Adam's initial spec as a starting point* - -**TODO: Remove non transport privacy layer aspects here** - Status Secure Messaging Protocol ================================================== @@ -585,4 +538,4 @@ For a mixnet based approach, see e.g. https://github.com/w3f/messaging/issues/22 - This trade-off appears suboptimal. -- Peer steering: https://github.com/ethereum/wiki/wiki/Whisper-PoC-2-Protocol-Spec \ No newline at end of file +- Peer steering: https://github.com/ethereum/wiki/wiki/Whisper-PoC-2-Protocol-Spec