a reputation protocol for open collaboration
Go to file
William Chargin 40409f3151
Generate `bin/` in-place for cron CI (#325)
Summary:
This fixes a bug introduced in #317, which only occurred in the cron job
variant of the CI script (`yarn travis --full`): the two scripts run in
the cron job depend on `yarn backend` having previously written to the
`bin/` directory, but this is precisely what we wanted to prevent. To
fix this, we simply add an additional target for `yarn backend` during
the cron job. This is a little bit wasteful in that we compile the
backend applications twice, but it’s not a big deal because (a) it only
runs in cron jobs, so it won’t slow down normal builds, and (b) it only
takes about 5 seconds, anyway.

Test Plan:
Export a `GITHUB_TOKEN` and run `yarn travis --full`, which fails before
this change and passes after it.

wchargin-branch: cron-ci-overwrite-bin
2018-05-31 18:29:55 -07:00
config Generate `bin/` in-place for cron CI (#325) 2018-05-31 18:29:55 -07:00
flow-typed/npm Add react-router-dom 2018-05-08 12:55:38 -07:00
scripts Don’t erase the `bin/` folder in CI (#317) 2018-05-29 15:40:42 -07:00
src Implement `toJSON` and `fromJSON` for GraphV2 (#323) 2018-05-31 14:25:17 -07:00
.eslintrc.js Disable the `no-useless-constructor` lint rule (#308) 2018-05-28 15:01:28 -07:00
.flowconfig Flow: enable `//$ExpectFlowError` (#315) 2018-05-29 13:56:36 -07:00
.gitignore Configure Webpack for backend applications (#84) 2018-03-18 22:43:23 -07:00
.prettierignore Only exclude top-level directories from Prettier (#154) 2018-04-26 19:47:58 -07:00
.prettierrc.json Move package json to root (#37) 2018-02-26 22:32:23 -08:00
.travis.yml Setup travis CI testing (#58) 2018-03-02 14:39:54 -08:00
LICENSE Add LICENSE 2018-02-03 17:58:49 -08:00
README.md Update the README (#124) 2018-04-09 08:49:54 +03:00
package.json Remove `lint-staged` pre-commit hook (#300) 2018-05-25 19:25:43 -07:00
yarn.lock Remove `lint-staged` pre-commit hook (#300) 2018-05-25 19:25:43 -07:00

README.md

SourceCred

Build Status

Vision

Open source software is amazing, and so are the creators and contributors who share it. How amazing? It's difficult to tell, since we don't have good tools for recognizing those people. Many amazing open-source contributors labor in the shadows, going unappreciated for the work they do.

As the open economy develops, we need to go beyond commit streaks and follower counts. We need transparent, accurate, and fair tools for recognizing and rewarding open collaboration. SourceCred aims to do that.

SourceCred will enable projects to create and track "cred", which is a quantitative measure of how much value different contributors added to a project. We'll do this by providing a basic data structure—a cred graph—into which projects can add all kinds of information about the contributions that compose it. For example, a software project might include information about GitHub pull requests, function declarations and implementations, design documents, community support, documentation, and so forth. We'll also provide an algorithm (PageRank) which will ingest all of this information and produce a "cred attribution", which assigns a cred value to each contribution, and thus to the people who authored the contributions.

Principles

SourceCred aims to be:

  1. Transparent

    If it's to be a legitimate and accepted way of tracking credit in projects, cred attribution can't be a black-box. SourceCred will provide tools that make it easy to dive into the cred attribution, and see exactly why contributions were valued the way they were.

  2. Community-controlled

    At the end of the day, the community of collaborators in a project will know best which contributions were important and deserve the most cred. No algorithm will do that perfectly on its own. To that end, we'll empower the community to modify the cred attribution, by adding human knowledge into the cred graph.

  3. Forkable

    Disputes about cred attribution are inevitable. Maybe a project you care about has a selfish maintainer who wants all the cred for themself :(. Not to worry—all of the cred data will be stored with the project, so you are empowered to solve cred disputes by forking the project.

Roadmap

SourceCred is currently in a very early stage. We are working full-time to develop a MVP, which will have the following basic features:

  • Create: The GitHub Plugin populates a project's GitHub data into a Contribution Graph. SourceCred uses this seed data to produce an initial, approximate cred attribution.

  • Read: The SourceCred Explorer enables users to examine the cred attribution, and all of the contributions in the graph. This reveals why the algorithm behaved the way that it did.

  • Update: The Artifact Plugin allows users to put their own knowledge into the system by adding new "Artifact Nodes" to the graph. An artifact node allows users to draw attention to contributions (or groups of contributions) that are particularly valuable. They can then merge this new information into the project repository, making it canonical.

Community

Please consider joining our community.