Summary:
Closes#902. CircleCI continues to work fast and well, on both the
commit and nightly workflows. Travis continues to be slower. It is time.
I have disabled Travis for `sourcecred/sourcecred` via:
<https://travis-ci.org/profile/sourcecred>
This commit removes the vestigial configuration files and code.
Test Plan:
Running `yarn test` still works. Running `yarn test --full` still works,
and properly invokes `sharness-full` and the various extra tests.
Running `git grep -i travis` yields no results.
wchargin-branch: ci-remove-travis
According to the [jest docs], setting `maxWorkers=4` can substantially
improve performance on CI.
This commit sets `maxWorkers=4` when running `yarn unit` as a part of
`yarn test`. Based on my local testing (see data below), this improves
performance locally in addition to the expected performance improvement
on travis.
\## Testing `yarn unit` by itself
```
yarn unit --maxWorkers=1
15.28s user 3.71s system 112% cpu 16.848 total
15.13s user 3.68s system 112% cpu 16.708 total
15.32s user 3.76s system 112% cpu 16.917 total
15.91s user 3.74s system 112% cpu 17.425 total
15.61s user 3.76s system 113% cpu 17.125 total
yarn unit --maxWorkers=2
19.43s user 4.03s system 212% cpu 11.061 total
19.86s user 4.19s system 210% cpu 11.407 total
21.19s user 4.26s system 213% cpu 11.902 total
20.68s user 4.51s system 212% cpu 11.873 total
20.78s user 4.26s system 212% cpu 11.780 total
yarn unit --maxWorkers=4
29.43s user 5.14s system 389% cpu 8.865 total
29.99s user 5.18s system 392% cpu 8.961 total
32.22s user 5.52s system 390% cpu 9.659 total
33.99s user 5.97s system 395% cpu 10.097 total
33.38s user 5.93s system 395% cpu 9.933 total
yarn unit --maxWorkers=8
48.21s user 6.57s system 621% cpu 8.815 total
51.61s user 7.16s system 610% cpu 9.622 total
59.48s user 7.82s system 621% cpu 10.833 total
58.18s user 8.10s system 624% cpu 10.607 total
58.92s user 8.22s system 620% cpu 10.817 total
unset
46.27s user 6.44s system 599% cpu 8.799 total
49.08s user 7.04s system 600% cpu 9.342 total
54.85s user 7.52s system 600% cpu 10.383 total
55.66s user 7.52s system 605% cpu 10.438 total
53.77s user 7.50s system 604% cpu 10.142 total
```
\## Testing `yarn test`
```
maxWorkers=1
46.65s user 5.92s system 249% cpu 21.038 total
47.94s user 5.81s system 251% cpu 21.354 total
51.50s user 6.44s system 260% cpu 22.234 total
52.60s user 6.65s system 268% cpu 22.077 total
53.04s user 6.27s system 266% cpu 22.278 total
maxWorkers=2
56.13s user 6.13s system 409% cpu 15.204 total
63.32s user 7.22s system 412% cpu 17.091 total
64.82s user 7.19s system 422% cpu 17.027 total
64.59s user 7.41s system 417% cpu 17.227 total
65.40s user 7.30s system 419% cpu 17.318 total
maxWorkers=4
74.64s user 7.60s system 584% cpu 14.066 total
82.69s user 8.43s system 582% cpu 15.643 total
85.00s user 8.68s system 591% cpu 15.835 total
84.81s user 8.58s system 595% cpu 15.690 total
85.22s user 8.59s system 596% cpu 15.719 total
maxWorkers=4 and everything depends on unit
59.29s user 6.01s system 378% cpu 17.261 total
62.99s user 6.64s system 375% cpu 18.564 total
65.54s user 7.31s system 375% cpu 19.419 total
63.24s user 7.13s system 379% cpu 18.548 total
63.68s user 7.13s system 383% cpu 18.457 total
maxWorkers=8
92.85s user 8.13s system 643% cpu 15.702 total
101.63s user 9.21s system 632% cpu 17.510 total
101.63s user 9.23s system 636% cpu 17.428 total
101.81s user 9.32s system 633% cpu 17.546 total
101.62s user 9.39s system 632% cpu 17.542 total
unset
88.75s user 8.15s system 646% cpu 14.988 total
96.43s user 9.23s system 631% cpu 16.739 total
98.27s user 9.17s system 638% cpu 16.819 total
98.46s user 9.01s system 642% cpu 16.729 total
98.53s user 9.15s system 637% cpu 16.889 total
unset + everything depends on unit
76.02s user 7.61s system 486% cpu 17.208 total
79.14s user 8.26s system 484% cpu 18.030 total
84.32s user 9.19s system 488% cpu 19.136 total
84.92s user 9.14s system 497% cpu 18.919 total
84.46s user 8.94s system 492% cpu 18.965 total
```
Test plan: `yarn test` passes here and on travis
[jest docs]: https://jestjs.io/docs/en/troubleshooting
Summary:
CI mode prevents Jest from automatically writing snapshots, and also
causes obsolete snapshots to be an error instead of a warning. This is
consistent with the behavior on Travis, where the `CI=1` environment
variable is set. It should thus be the default when running `yarn test`
(but not `yarn unit`).
Test Plan:
Add a file `src/foo.test.js`:
```js
// @flow
describe("foo", () => {
it("bar", () => {
expect("baz").toMatchSnapshot();
});
});
```
Note that `yarn test` fails with the message, “new snapshot was not
written”.
Revert this change, then re-run `yarn test`; note that it passes,
writing a snapshot.
Then, reinstate this change and delete `src/foo.test.js`. Note that
running `yarn test` fails, due to an obsolete snapshot. Revert the
change again, and watch `yarn test` pass despite the obsolete snapshot.
Finally, remove the snapshot. :-)
wchargin-branch: test-jest-ci
Summary:
Lots of tests need the output of `yarn backend`. Before this commit,
they tended to create it themselves. This was slow and wasteful, and
also could in principle have race conditions (though in practice usually
tended not to).
This commit updates tests to respect a `SOURCECRED_BIN` environment
variable indicating the path to an existing directory of backend
applications.
Closes#765.
Test Plan:
Running `yarn test --full` passes.
Prepending `echo run >>/tmp/log &&` to the `backend` script in
`package.json` and running `yarn test --full` results in a log file
containing only one line, indicating that the script really is run only
once.
wchargin-branch: deduplicate-backend
Summary:
This commit removes the `config/backend.js` script and replaces it with
a direct invocation of Webpack. This enables us to use command-line
arguments to Webpack, like `--output-path`.
Test Plan:
Note that `rm -rf bin; yarn backend` still works, and that the resulting
applications work (`node bin/sourcecred.js load`). Note that `yarn test`
and `yarn test --full` still work.
wchargin-branch: backend-webpack-direct
Summary:
This simplifies interfaces everywhere.
See also #216, which did the opposite of this as a temporary fix due to
a Babel/Webpack interaction that no longer exists as of #766.
Test Plan:
Note that `node bin/sourcecred.js load sourcecred/example-git` still
works (after `yarn backend`). Note that `yarn test` still works. These
demonstrate that the module works from both a Webpack context and a Node
context. Note that `git grep --name-only execDependencyGraph` yields
exactly those files touched in this commit. Note that `yarn test --full`
passes.
wchargin-branch: commonjs-execDependencyGraph
Summary:
We will shortly want to perform testing of shell scripts; it makes the
most sense to do so via the shell. We could roll our own testing
framework, but it makes more sense to use an existing one. By choosing
Sharness, we’re in good company: `go-ipfs` and `go-multihash` use it as
well, and it’s derived from Git’s testing library. I like it a lot.
For now, we need a dummy test file; our test runner will fail if there
are no tests to run. As soon as we have a real test, we can remove this.
This commit was generated by following the “per-project installation”
instructions at https://github.com/chriscool/sharness, and by
additionally including that repository’s `COPYING` file as
`SHARNESS_LICENSE`, with a header prepended. I considered instead adding
Sharness as a submodule, which is supported and has clear advantages
(e.g., you can update the thing), but opted to avoid the complexity of
submodules for now.
Test Plan:
Create the following tests in the `sharness` directory:
```shell
$ cat sharness/good.t
#!/bin/sh
test_description='demo of passing tests'
. ./sharness.sh
test_expect_success "look at me go" true
test_expect_success EXPENSIVE "this may take a while" 'sleep 2'
test_done
# vim: ft=sh
$ cat sharness/bad.t
#!/bin/sh
test_description='demo of failing tests'
. ./sharness.sh
test_expect_success "I don't feel so good" false
test_done
# vim: ft=sh
```
Note that `yarn sharness` and `yarn test` fail appropriately. Note that
`yarn sharness-full` fails appropriately after taking two extra seconds,
and `yarn test --full` runs the latter. Each failure message should
print the name of the failing test case, not just the suite name, and
should indicate that the passing tests passed.
Then, remove `sharness/bad.t`, and note that the above commands all
pass, with the `--full` variants still taking longer.
Finally, remove `sharness/good.t`, and note that the above commands all
pass (and all pass quickly).
wchargin-branch: add-sharness
Summary:
Running `yarn test` (equiv. `npm test` or `npm run test`) now runs all
checks. It takes the place of the former `yarn travis`. This is more in
line with the expectation of a top-level `test` command: if it passes,
your code is good.
The `unit` command now runs Jest once, not in watch mode. It takes the
place of the former `ci-test`. To run tests in watch mode, run any of
the following:
- `yarn unit --watch`, or
- `npm run unit -- --watch`, or
- `npm unit -- --watch`.
This behavior is more consistent with the standard behavior of commands
like `make test`. It is also empirically what @wchargin and
@decentralion want most of the time.
Test Plan:
Verify that each of the scripts `test`, `unit`, and `coverage` passes.
Verify that each of the aforementioned `--watch` invocations works.
Verify that `.travis.yml` has the correct `script:` command.
wchargin-branch: reorganize-test-command
William Chargin
Dandelion Mané