Fix address `toString` test case structure (#351)
Summary: This fixes an organizational error on my part: the assertions were not in `it`-blocks, so (a) no test cases were listed, and (b) assertion failure would have been considered an error in the test suite itself. (This wouldn’t have led to tests spuriously passing, though.) Test Plan: Note the new test case structure: ``` nodeToString errors on ✓ null base input ✓ undefined base input ✓ wrong kind works on ✓ the empty address ✓ the address with one empty component ✓ a normal address edgeToString errors on ✓ null base input ✓ undefined base input ✓ wrong kind works on ✓ the empty address ✓ the address with one empty component ✓ a normal address ``` wchargin-branch: tostring-test-case-structure
This commit is contained in:
parent
1a8de82715
commit
bc98383053
|
@ -171,11 +171,17 @@ describe("core/address", () => {
|
|||
|
||||
describe("works on", () => {
|
||||
const camelKind = kind.charAt(0).toLowerCase() + kind.substring(1);
|
||||
expect(f(goodConstructor([]))).toEqual(`${camelKind}([])`);
|
||||
expect(f(goodConstructor([""]))).toEqual(`${camelKind}([""])`);
|
||||
expect(f(goodConstructor(["one", "", "two"]))).toEqual(
|
||||
`${camelKind}(["one","","two"])`
|
||||
);
|
||||
test("the empty address", () => {
|
||||
expect(f(goodConstructor([]))).toEqual(`${camelKind}([])`);
|
||||
});
|
||||
test("the address with one empty component", () => {
|
||||
expect(f(goodConstructor([""]))).toEqual(`${camelKind}([""])`);
|
||||
});
|
||||
test("a normal address", () => {
|
||||
expect(f(goodConstructor(["one", "", "two"]))).toEqual(
|
||||
`${camelKind}(["one","","two"])`
|
||||
);
|
||||
});
|
||||
});
|
||||
});
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue