One too many closing parentheses in several instances of ))))
This commit is contained in:
parent
d13cb97507
commit
c1fb55e571
|
@ -391,8 +391,8 @@ We identify such a set of circumstances. To discuss more generally, we denote ``
|
|||
We say that validator $v_i$ ``sees validator $v_j$ agreeing with estimate $e$ in a set of protocol messages $M$'' if:
|
||||
\begin{itemize}
|
||||
\item $v_i$ has exactly one latest message in $M$ (we are denoting this message as $L(v_i, M)$)
|
||||
\item $v_j$ has exactly one latest message in the justification of $v_i$'s latest message, $J(L(v_i, M))$ (which we denote as $L(v_j, J(L(v_i, M))))$
|
||||
\item This message's estimate agrees with $e$, i.e. $E(L(v_j, J(L(v_i, M))))) \equiv e$
|
||||
\item $v_j$ has exactly one latest message in the justification of $v_i$'s latest message, $J(L(v_i, M))$ (which we denote as $L(v_j, J(L(v_i, M)))$
|
||||
\item This message's estimate agrees with $e$, i.e. $E(L(v_j, J(L(v_i, M)))) \equiv e$
|
||||
\end{itemize}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{defn}[$v_i$ sees $v_j$ agreeing with $e$ in $M$]
|
||||
|
@ -404,14 +404,14 @@ $$
|
|||
And we say that a validator $v_i$ ``can see $v_j$ disagreeing with estimate $e$ in a set of protocol messages $M$'' if:
|
||||
\begin{itemize}
|
||||
\item $v_i$ has exactly one latest message in $M$, $L(v_i, M)$
|
||||
\item $v_j$ has exactly one latest message in the justification of $v_i$'s latest message, $J(L(v_i, M))$ (which we denote as $L(v_j, J(L(v_i, M))))$
|
||||
\item $v_j$ has a ``new latest message for $v_i$'' $m \in M$ such that $m \succ L(v_j, J(L(v_i, M))))$
|
||||
\item $v_j$ has exactly one latest message in the justification of $v_i$'s latest message, $J(L(v_i, M))$ (which we denote as $L(v_j, J(L(v_i, M)))$
|
||||
\item $v_j$ has a ``new latest message for $v_i$'' $m \in M$ such that $m \succ L(v_j, J(L(v_i, M)))$
|
||||
\item And this $m$ disagrees with $e$, $E(m) \not\equiv e$
|
||||
\end{itemize}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{defn}[$v_i$ can see $v_j$ disagreeing with $e$ in $M$]
|
||||
$$
|
||||
v_i \xRightarrow[\text{$M$}]{\text{$\not\equiv, e$}} v_j \iff \exists m \in M : V(m) = v_j \land m \succ L(v_j, J(L(v_i, M)))) \land E(m) \not\equiv e
|
||||
v_i \xRightarrow[\text{$M$}]{\text{$\not\equiv, e$}} v_j \iff \exists m \in M : V(m) = v_j \land m \succ L(v_j, J(L(v_i, M))) \land E(m) \not\equiv e
|
||||
$$
|
||||
\end{defn}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue