Summary:
88c6e7a22b / D3446871 broke the OSS version of React where React.xcodeproj isn't autogenerated.
**Test plan:** UIExplorer example works again.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/8288
Differential Revision: D3466246
Pulled By: javache
fbshipit-source-id: 1240b755b0df54ddfde016d0122640293e50caeb
Summary: This diff build the connection between the native code and js code so that the js could get IsRTL value and us ForceRTL function.
Reviewed By: fkgozali
Differential Revision: D3447013
fbshipit-source-id: 9f6c7f71cef0add7bd5beb0ba2b1543f0cabc2b3
Summary: Create a module for React Native to get IsRTL information and set ForceRTL function.
Reviewed By: fkgozali
Differential Revision: D3446871
fbshipit-source-id: 736edf138a89d222818071370ac49dc54bda63b7
Summary:
Issue we were seeing: scrollview would clip its cells when it was resized to 0 height and moved offscreen, but it wouldn't add it back when it was resized and moved back
Why this was happening: scrollview wouldn't rerun its un/clipping logic after the first run unless 1/it has 0x0 frame or 2/it has been scrolled. Neither was happening here.
Fix: run the un/clipping logic when scrollview's frame has been changed since the last clipping.
Reviewed By: javache
Differential Revision: D3436996
fbshipit-source-id: 1a8cfeb72b425fcc80815d30743fa308b9c75ab6
Summary:
We already do this on Android, and it allows uw to avoid doing this global object lookup for every call. Since there's only a couple of global functions we ever call, we should consider caching all of them in the new bridge.
I didn't ValueProtect/ValueUnprotect since these are already globals, and those methods are not exposed on the JSC wrapper.
Reviewed By: mhorowitz
Differential Revision: D3411487
fbshipit-source-id: 7feaf8803665b77d649e84edad875d31c5acee4b
Summary:
Implemented automatic IP detection for iOS, based on #6345 and #6362.
As the previous pull requests did, this works by writing the IP address of the host to a file.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/8091
Differential Revision: D3427657
Pulled By: javache
fbshipit-source-id: 3f534c9b32c4d6fb9615fc2e2c3c3aef421454c5
Summary: Expose the ability to provide extra information to Systrace events from JS. This is specifically useful for instrumenting generic recursive method that are defined completely through their params.
Reviewed By: tadeuzagallo
Differential Revision: D3423595
fbshipit-source-id: 7f2dedf02bf901401a6b391b85b1a0bb6782349c
Summary:
Fix a bug that happens when views are added and removed in the same manageChildren block with a delete animation. What happens is that the inserted view is not inserted at the proper index if the deleted view index is smaller than the inserted one. This is because the view is not immediately removed from the subviews array so we need to offset the insert index for each view that is going to be deleted with an animation and is before the inserted view.
To do this I separated `_removeChildren` into 2 different functions, one for animated delete and one for normal delete. The animated one returns an array of `RCTComponent` that are going to be animated. We can then use this array to offset the insert index.
**Test plan (required)**
Tested that this fixed the bug in an app where I noticed it, also tested the UIExplorer example to make sure LayoutAnimations still worked properly.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/7942
Differential Revision: D3417194
Pulled By: bestander
fbshipit-source-id: 9145a783e520c6718dd023a1e006646acb09cb7c
Summary:
Fix a bug that happens when views are added and removed in the same manageChildren block with a delete animation. What happens is that the inserted view is not inserted at the proper index if the deleted view index is smaller than the inserted one. This is because the view is not immediately removed from the subviews array so we need to offset the insert index for each view that is going to be deleted with an animation and is before the inserted view.
To do this I separated `_removeChildren` into 2 different functions, one for animated delete and one for normal delete. The animated one returns an array of `RCTComponent` that are going to be animated. We can then use this array to offset the insert index.
**Test plan (required)**
Tested that this fixed the bug in an app where I noticed it, also tested the UIExplorer example to make sure LayoutAnimations still worked properly.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/7942
Differential Revision: D3417194
Pulled By: nicklockwood
fbshipit-source-id: 790f4ac15a8552323b359e6466cecfa80418c63c
Summary: Converted the zIndex property on iOS to NSInteger instead of double. This is consistent with the CSS spec, and helps to simplify the Android implementation.
Reviewed By: javache
Differential Revision: D3411491
fbshipit-source-id: 902ebc29aac39a65f7e8707a28607655f9f5052c
Summary:
After cleaning up JS SourceMap code, these native methods are not needed anymore.
On iOS it saves another 30+ Mb during development.
Reviewed By: javache, astreet
Differential Revision: D3348975
fbshipit-source-id: a68ae9b00b4dbaa374b421029ae676fc69ae5a75
Summary:
This diff implement the CSS z-index for React Native iOS views. We've had numerous pull request for this feature, but they've all attempted to use the `layer.zPosition` property, which is problematic for two reasons:
1. zPosition only affects rendering order, not event processing order. Views with a higher zPosition will appear in front of others in the hierarchy, but won't be the first to receive touch events, and may be blocked by views that are visually behind them.
2. when using a perspective transform matrix, views with a nonzero zPosition will be rendered in a different position due to parallax, which probably isn't desirable.
See https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/7825 for further discussion of this problem.
So instead of using `layer.zPosition`, I've implemented this by actually adjusting the order of the subviews within their parent based on the zIndex. This can't be done on the JS side because it would affect layout, which is order-dependent, so I'm doing it inside the view itself.
It works as follows:
1. The `reactSubviews` array is set, whose order matches the order of the JS components and shadowView components, as specified by the UIManager.
2. `didUpdateReactSubviews` is called, which in turn calls `sortedSubviews` (which lazily generates a sorted array of `reactSubviews` by zIndex) and inserts the result into the view.
3. If a subview is added or removed, or the zIndex of any subview is changed, the previous `sortedSubviews` array is cleared and `didUpdateReactSubviews` is called again.
To demonstrate it working, I've modified the UIExplorer example from https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/7825
Reviewed By: javache
Differential Revision: D3365717
fbshipit-source-id: b34aa8bfad577bce023f8af5414f9b974aafd8aa
Summary:
This diff refactors the view update process into two stages:
1. The `reactSubviews` array is set, whose order matches the order of the JS components and shadowView components, as specified by the UIManager.
2. The `didUpdateReactSubviews` method is called, which actually inserts the reactSubviews into the view hierarchy.
This simplifies a lot of the hacks we had for special-case treatment of subviews: In many cases we don't want to actually insert `reactSubviews` into the parentView, and we had a bunch of component-specific solutions for that (typically overriding all of the reactSubviews methods to store views in an array). Now, we can simply override the `didUpdateReactSubviews` method for those views to do nothing, or do something different.
Reviewed By: wwjholmes
Differential Revision: D3396594
fbshipit-source-id: 92fc56fd31db0cfc66aac3d1634a4d4ae3903085
Summary:
This is a followup for "Add Shortcut "Double R" to Reload JS in iOS".
Please see the previous two revisions:[[ D3371536 | D3371536 ]], [[ D3343907 | D3343907 ]]
In previous revisions, we only tested with the iOS UIExplorer app, without testing in the iOS Catalyst app, where the key shortcuts we added are always invoked in TextInput components. It's due to a bug with the `UIApplicationDelegate`. Just fix this bug in this revision and successfully tested in the Catalyst app.
Reviewed By: mkonicek
Differential Revision: D3391045
fbshipit-source-id: 8b76fbfe7592218b02dd22502d25eebbc59f3cbc
Summary:
As per https://twitter.com/olebegemann/status/738656134731599872, our use of "main thread" to mean "main queue" seems to be unsafe.
This diff replaces the `NSThread.isMainQueue` checks with dispatch_get_specific(), which is the recommended approach.
I've also replaced all use of "MainThread" terminology with "MainQueue", and taken the opportunity to deprecate the "sync" param of `RCTExecuteOnMainThread()`, which, while we do still use it in a few places, is incredibly unsafe and shouldn't be encouraged.
Reviewed By: javache
Differential Revision: D3384910
fbshipit-source-id: ea7c216013372267b82eb25a38db5eb4cd46a089
Summary:
The `removeClippedSubviews` feature works by umounting views from the hierarchy if they move outside the bounds of their parent.
This was previously restricted to clipping views which had `overflow: hidden`, since we cannot efficiently check whether the subviews of a view go outside its bounds, and so clipping a view that has potentially overflowing children becomes an expensive recursive operation.
The problem with this is that `overflow: visible` is the default, and it's not well documented nor easy to tell that `removeClippedSubviews` has been set up correctly (i.e. with all children having `overflow: hidden`).
When I checked, I found that `removeClippedSubviews` was not working on any of the examples in UIExplorer, nor in several of our internal apps, because the views inside the ListView has `overflow: visible`. This was probably caused by an infra change at some point, but I'm not sure how long it's been broken.
It's vanishingly unlikely that anyone would ever deliberately want subviews to overflow their bounds in this scenario, so I've updated the logic to simply ignore the `overflow` property and assume that views should be clipped if you are using the `removeClippedSubviews` property on the parent.
Cons / Breaking changes: in some rare circumstances, a view might get clipped prematurely if its parent is outside the scrollview bounds, but it itself is inside. This doesn't occur in practice in any of our products, and could be worked around with additional wrapper views if it did.
Pros: removeClippedSubviews is now much easier to use, and much more likely to work as intended, so most list-based apps should see a performance improvement.
Reviewed By: javache
Differential Revision: D3385316
fbshipit-source-id: 1c0064a4c21340a971ba80d794062a356ae6cfb3
Summary:
RCTScrollView was calling `dockClosestSectionHeader` in `reactBridgeDidFinishTransaction`, which triggers a layout update. The reason for this was in case the `stickyHeaderIndexes` property was updated, which would require the headers to be adjusted.
However, doing this in `reactBridgeDidFinishTransaction` had the affect of causing `layoutSubviews` to be called repeatedly every frame even if nothing had changed and the scrollview wasn't moving, which was especially expensive when combined with the `removeClippedSubviews` logic, that loops through every view to calculate if it needs to be clipped.
This fix moves the `dockClosestSectionHeader` call into `didUpdateProps`, and checks that the stickyHeaderIndexes have actually changed before calling it.
Reviewed By: javache
Differential Revision: D3387607
fbshipit-source-id: c71e00c6fac48337a63d7fee7c7c23e016acf24e
Summary:
Allows developers to specify headers to include in the HTTP request
when fetching a remote image. For example, one might leverage this
when fetching an image from an endpoint that requires authentication:
```
<Image
style={styles.logo}
source={{
uri: 'http://facebook.github.io/react/img/logo_og.png',
headers: {
Authorization: 'someAuthToken'
}
}}
/>
```
Note that the header values must be strings.
Works on iOS and Android.
**Test plan (required)**
- Ran a small example like the one above on iOS and Android and ensured the headers were sent to the server.
- Ran a small example to ensure that \<Image\> components without headers still work.
- Currently using this code in our app.
Adam Comella
Microsoft Corp.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/7338
Reviewed By: javache
Differential Revision: D3371458
Pulled By: nicklockwood
fbshipit-source-id: cdb24fe2572c3ae3ba82c86ad383af6d85157e20
Summary:
Enable double tap R on iOS, consistent with Android.
Keep the existing Cmd+R on iOS because people are already used to it.
Make Cmd+Key and Double Key both invalid when focus is in textview or textfield.
Also try to add Cmd+R in Android, but seems no good.
Reviewed By: nicklockwood
Differential Revision: D3343907
fbshipit-source-id: 68f7e3b0393711c137e1d932db33e1b6a2a19e09
Summary:
Previously, only Text and Image could be nested within Text. Now, any
view can be nested within Text. One restriction of this feature is
that developers must give inline views a width and a height via
the style prop.
Previously, inline Images were supported by using iOS's built-in support
for rendering images with an NSAttributedString via NSTextAttachment.
However, NSAttributedString doesn't support rendering arbitrary views.
This change adds support for nesting views within Text by creating one
NSTextAttachment per inline view. The NSTextAttachments act as placeholders.
They are set to be the size of the corresponding view. After the text is
laid out, we query the text system to find out where it has positioned each
NSTextAttachment. We then position the views to be at those locations.
This commit also contains a change in `RCTShadowText.m`
`_setParagraphStyleOnAttributedString:heightOfTallestSubview:`. It now only sets
`lineHeight`, `textAlign`, and `writingDirection` when they've actua
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/7304
Reviewed By: javache
Differential Revision: D3365373
Pulled By: nicklockwood
fbshipit-source-id: 66d149eb80c5c6725311e1e46d7323eec086ce64
Summary: The view update cycle in UIManager was relying on a bunch of boolean values boxes as NSNumbers in parallel arrays. This diff packs those values into a struct, which is more efficient and easier to maintain.
Reviewed By: javache
Differential Revision: D3365346
fbshipit-source-id: d9cbf2865421f76772c1761b13992d40ec3675f0
Summary: The view update cycle in UIManager was relying on a bunch of boolean values boxes as NSNumbers in parallel arrays. This diff packs those values into a struct, which is more efficient and easier to maintain.
Reviewed By: javache
Differential Revision: D3253073
fbshipit-source-id: abbf2a910aeb536050c3a83513fb542962ce71a5
Nathan Azaria
Philipp von Weitershausen
Alexey Lang
Mengjue Wang
Alex Kotliarskyi
Pieter De Baets
Martin Kralik
Siqi Liu
Clement Genzmer
Emil Sjolander
Yinan Na
Konstantin Raev
Janic Duplessis
Sokovikov
Fabian Eichinger
Nick Lockwood
Gerald Monaco
Adam Comella
Martin Konicek
Li Jie
Blair Vanderhoof
