Summary: Move all requires of UIManager to UIManager.js, so we can load the view manager configuration lazily when UIManager is required.
Reviewed By: majak
Differential Revision: D3270147
fb-gh-sync-id: 8208ee8d5919102ea5345e7031af47ee78162fe0
fbshipit-source-id: 8208ee8d5919102ea5345e7031af47ee78162fe0
Summary:
This avoids requiring things that may never be used at all by the application such as WebSocket or Geolocation. It also stops us from asking for native modules
before we actually start the application enabling us to potentially be more lazy in the future.
Reviewed By: davidaurelio
Differential Revision: D3212802
fb-gh-sync-id: 70cf0d1a85f39fedc47758e5eb5df789a511bc9b
fbshipit-source-id: 70cf0d1a85f39fedc47758e5eb5df789a511bc9b
Summary:In Jest, we sometimes wipe away the (partial) state of the world. I noticed that when we run the NativeModules file twice, it throws. Because Jest implicitly throws out the state, it isn't obvious what exactly is going on.
I figured I'll fix this in react-native directly as I don't see a reason why those fields shouldn't be configurable. This shouldn't have any negative impact on react-native apps themselves.
cc ide bestander tadeuzagallo davidaurelio
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/6914
Differential Revision: D3162561
Pulled By: cpojer
fb-gh-sync-id: d3418ec210278a44f8ad325f7e9e01872b4877d1
fbshipit-source-id: d3418ec210278a44f8ad325f7e9e01872b4877d1
Summary:
public
Android implement ViewManager methods via a dispatch method on UIManager, whereas iOS implements them by exposing the methods on the view manager modules directly.
This diff polyfills Android's implementation on top of the iOS implementation, allowing the same JS API to be used for both.
Reviewed By: javache
Differential Revision: D2803020
fb-gh-sync-id: 0da0544e593dc936467d16ce957a77f7ca41355b
Summary:
public
NativeModule getters call the nativeRequireModuleConfig function to lazily load a module if it's not already available, but this crashes on Android since the nativeRequireModuleConfig hook hasn't been implemented yet. This diff checks that the hook exists before calling it.
Reviewed By: gsaraf
Differential Revision: D2744080
fb-gh-sync-id: cae9c8c45a4d3c80ceb8c10f3d4d59a8d9d3c7f8
Summary:
The JavaScript ecosystem doesn't have the notion of a built-in native module loader. Even Node is decoupled from its module loader. The module loader system is just JS that runs on top of the global `process` object which has all the built-in goodies.
Additionally there is no such thing as a global require. That is something unique to our providesModule system. In other module systems such as node, every require is contextual. Even registered npm names are localized by version.
The only global namespace that is accessible to the host environment is the global object. Normally module systems attaches itself onto the hooks provided by the host environment on the global object.
Currently, we have two forms of dispatch that reaches directly into the module system. executeJSCall which reaches directly into require. Everything now calls through the BatchedBridge module (except one RCTLog edge case that I will fix). I propose that the executors calls directly onto `BatchedBridge` through an instance on the global so that everything is guaranteed to go through it. It becomes the main communication hub.
I also propose that we drop the dynamic requires inside of MessageQueue/BatchBridge and instead have the modules register themselves with the bridge.
executeJSCall was originally modeled after the XHP equivalent. The XHP equivalent was designed that way because the act of doing the call was the thing that defined a dependency on the module from the page. However, that is not how React Native works.
The JS side is driving the dependencies by virtue of requiring new modules and frameworks and the existence of dependencies is driven by the JS side, so this design doesn't make as much sense.
The main driver for this is to be able to introduce a new module system like Prepack's module system. However, it also unlocks the possibility to do dead module elimination even in our current module system. It is currently not possible because we don't know which module might be called from native.
Since the module system now becomes decoupled we could publish all our providesModule modules as npm/CommonJS modules using a rewrite script. That's what React Core does.
That way people could use any CommonJS bundler such as Webpack, Closure Compiler, Rollup or some new innovation to create a JS bundle.
This diff expands the executeJSCalls to the BatchedBridge's three individual pieces to make them first class instead of being dynamic. This removes one layer of abstraction. Hopefully we can also remove more of the things that register themselves with the BatchedBridge (various EventEmitters) and instead have everything go through the public protocol. ReactMethod/RCT_EXPORT_METHOD.
public
Reviewed By: vjeux
Differential Revision: D2717535
fb-gh-sync-id: 70114f05483124f5ac5c4570422bb91a60a727f6
Alexander Blom
Pieter De Baets
Christoph Pojer
cpojer
Nick Lockwood
glevi@fb.com
tantan
Sebastian Markbage
Nathan Spaun
Eric Vicenti
Kevin Gozali
Tadeu Zagallo
Gabe Levi
Krzysztof Magiera
Philipp von Weitershausen
Spencer Ahrens
Alex Kotliarskyi
Basil Hosmer
Christopher Chedeau