Summary:
This diff refactors the view update process into two stages:
1. The `reactSubviews` array is set, whose order matches the order of the JS components and shadowView components, as specified by the UIManager.
2. The `didUpdateReactSubviews` method is called, which actually inserts the reactSubviews into the view hierarchy.
This simplifies a lot of the hacks we had for special-case treatment of subviews: In many cases we don't want to actually insert `reactSubviews` into the parentView, and we had a bunch of component-specific solutions for that (typically overriding all of the reactSubviews methods to store views in an array). Now, we can simply override the `didUpdateReactSubviews` method for those views to do nothing, or do something different.
Reviewed By: wwjholmes
Differential Revision: D3396594
fbshipit-source-id: 92fc56fd31db0cfc66aac3d1634a4d4ae3903085
Summary:
As per https://twitter.com/olebegemann/status/738656134731599872, our use of "main thread" to mean "main queue" seems to be unsafe.
This diff replaces the `NSThread.isMainQueue` checks with dispatch_get_specific(), which is the recommended approach.
I've also replaced all use of "MainThread" terminology with "MainQueue", and taken the opportunity to deprecate the "sync" param of `RCTExecuteOnMainThread()`, which, while we do still use it in a few places, is incredibly unsafe and shouldn't be encouraged.
Reviewed By: javache
Differential Revision: D3384910
fbshipit-source-id: ea7c216013372267b82eb25a38db5eb4cd46a089
Summary:It was hard to understand which parts of the shadowview API are designed to be called only on the root view, and which were applicable to any view.
This diff extracts rootview-specific logic out into a new RCTRootShadowView class.
Reviewed By: majak
Differential Revision: D3063905
fb-gh-sync-id: ef890cddfd7625fbd4bf5454314b441acdb03ac8
shipit-source-id: ef890cddfd7625fbd4bf5454314b441acdb03ac8
Summary:
public
A lot of the core modules have to use private methods in the bridge, specially
since the `RCTBatchedBridge` interface is never exposed. That was leading to a
lot of different private bridge categories spread across different modules,
which makes harder to identify which modules are affected by private API changes.
Replace all the categories with a single private header.
Reviewed By: nicklockwood
Differential Revision: D2757564
fb-gh-sync-id: 793158b9082d542b74a6094ed0db4d5dc3a88f78
Summary:
The JavaScript ecosystem doesn't have the notion of a built-in native module loader. Even Node is decoupled from its module loader. The module loader system is just JS that runs on top of the global `process` object which has all the built-in goodies.
Additionally there is no such thing as a global require. That is something unique to our providesModule system. In other module systems such as node, every require is contextual. Even registered npm names are localized by version.
The only global namespace that is accessible to the host environment is the global object. Normally module systems attaches itself onto the hooks provided by the host environment on the global object.
Currently, we have two forms of dispatch that reaches directly into the module system. executeJSCall which reaches directly into require. Everything now calls through the BatchedBridge module (except one RCTLog edge case that I will fix). I propose that the executors calls directly onto `BatchedBridge` through an instance on the global so that everything is guaranteed to go through it. It becomes the main communication hub.
I also propose that we drop the dynamic requires inside of MessageQueue/BatchBridge and instead have the modules register themselves with the bridge.
executeJSCall was originally modeled after the XHP equivalent. The XHP equivalent was designed that way because the act of doing the call was the thing that defined a dependency on the module from the page. However, that is not how React Native works.
The JS side is driving the dependencies by virtue of requiring new modules and frameworks and the existence of dependencies is driven by the JS side, so this design doesn't make as much sense.
The main driver for this is to be able to introduce a new module system like Prepack's module system. However, it also unlocks the possibility to do dead module elimination even in our current module system. It is currently not possible because we don't know which module might be called from native.
Since the module system now becomes decoupled we could publish all our providesModule modules as npm/CommonJS modules using a rewrite script. That's what React Core does.
That way people could use any CommonJS bundler such as Webpack, Closure Compiler, Rollup or some new innovation to create a JS bundle.
This diff expands the executeJSCalls to the BatchedBridge's three individual pieces to make them first class instead of being dynamic. This removes one layer of abstraction. Hopefully we can also remove more of the things that register themselves with the BatchedBridge (various EventEmitters) and instead have everything go through the public protocol. ReactMethod/RCT_EXPORT_METHOD.
public
Reviewed By: vjeux
Differential Revision: D2717535
fb-gh-sync-id: 70114f05483124f5ac5c4570422bb91a60a727f6
Summary: public
The WebView executor has no benefits compared to the JSC executor (slower, no extra debugging tools...),
and it's pretty hacky (since it injects the code in a script tag we have to check for tags in the comments and etc...).
Reviewed By: nicklockwood, javache
Differential Revision: D2636465
fb-gh-sync-id: 0d0f8a59e2c12fe7905b02060b3938c894d2802b
Summary:
There's no good reason for initialProperties to be mutable after the RCTRootView has been created. Passing it in through the constructor means we can skip one dispatch_async.
Summary:
Moved the view creation & property binding logic out of RCTUIManager into a separate RCTComponentData class - this follows the pattern used with the bridge.
I've also updated the property binding to use pre-allocated blocks for setting the values, which is more efficient than the previous system that re-contructed the selectors each time it was called. This should improve view update performance significantly.
Summary:
Occasionally people create RCTBridgeModule subclasses or base classes that are not intended to be accessed from JS, and so they don't export them. This was previously flagged as an error by the system. I've now downgraded this error to a warning at startup, and deferred the redbox error until the module is directly accessed by native or JS code.
Summary:
@public
Add PerformanceLogger to keep track of JS download, initial script execution and
full TTI.
Test Plan:
The Native side currently calls `addTimespans` when it's finish initializing
with the six values (start and end for the three events), so I just checked it
with a `PerformanceLogger.logTimespans()` at the end of the function.
```
2015-06-18 16:47:19.096 [info][tid:com.facebook.React.JavaScript] "ScriptDownload: 48ms"
2015-06-18 16:47:19.096 [info][tid:com.facebook.React.JavaScript] "ScriptExecution: 106ms"
2015-06-18 16:47:19.096 [info][tid:com.facebook.React.JavaScript] "TTI: 293ms"
```
Summary:
@public
This removes the last piece of data that was still stored on the DATA section,
`RCT_IMPORT_METHOD`. JS calls now dynamically populate a lookup table simultaneously
on JS and Native, instead of creating a mapping at load time.
Test Plan: Everything still runs, tests are green.
Summary:
@public
I've increased the warning levels in the OSS frameworks, which caught a bunch of minor issues. I also fixed some new errors in Xcode 7 relating to designated initializers and TLS security.
Test Plan:
* Test the sample apps and make sure they still work.
* Run tests.
Summary:
The RCTRootView creates a underlying RCTRootContentView that was deallocated when
the bridge modules were deallocated. That doesn't work when the bridge is held.
@public
Test Plan:
Launch Groups, put a breakpoint on `-[RCTRootContentView dealloc]`, enter and
leave a group page. It should be called now.
Summary:
The root view's content was being rendered at the wrong offset when it was not positioned at (0, 0) exactly, because the shadow view's frame was set to the root view's frame when it should have been set to the root view's bounds instead.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/963
Github Author: James Ide <ide@jameside.com>
Test Plan: Render a root view positioned at (0, 100) and see that its content is positioned where the root view is, not at (0, 200).
Nick Lockwood
Marc Horowitz
Martin Kralik
Oleg Lokhvitsky
Pieter De Baets
Tadeu Zagallo
Sebastian Markbage
Pawel Sienkowski
Robert Fleischmann
Alex Akers
Krzysztof Magiera
Ben Alpert
James Ide
guru inamdar
